I have been scolding $ZK for many days. I guess the ZK project team has felt the pressure. How should we distinguish ZK rationally?

First of all, there are those stars in the track projects: MATIC, IMX, and STRK. These are the top three projects of zero-knowledge proof. It is an honor that ZK can be ranked 4th by relying on the contrast of its peers.

Recall that $STRK performed the same when it opened, so it seems that the "ZKP" lineup is the same?

STRK did not show a strong upward trend after it went online. Although ETH showed a strong rise in late February and early March, and mid-to-late May, STRK did not have any strong rising cycle, and even fell at one time, which made traders seriously doubt it.

Why is the "ZKP" series so bad except for MATIC and $IMX ? On the contrary, Vitalik was still optimistic about it.

Because "ZKP" technology does bring very high throughput and processing speed to the ETH network, and it is also reliable in terms of security. The possibility of not pulling the market:

1. It cannot achieve the purpose of capital utilization and speculation.

2. The performance redundancy of the ETH network is serious now. What is needed now is to encourage on-chain rather than develop side chain demand to seize the market.

3. Layer1/2 can achieve faster processing speeds, and there is no performance comparison. This is no longer a highlight.

So there are signs that ZK will not be able to get going. In addition, I will say something fair. Since ZK is a project, people will still buy it. The same is true for the crypto market. The consensus is on market value and benchmarking. If there is room, it is a consensus of interests.

I think you can take a look at the next door #ZKJ . This market is really fucking awesome!

#币安合约锦标赛 #AirdropGuide