Mistakes Made About Zksync Airdrop - Multi-Friendly Projects

1️⃣First of all, I don't understand why Zksync airdropped the wallets marked by Layerzero. Like every airdrop, this one also brought benefits to multiples and certain individuals. Eliminated real users. People may have suffered serious losses from an airdrop for the first time.

After 2️⃣4 years, such a terrible job could not have been done regarding the airdrop. I think 4 years is a very long time to do a job well. Have you not learned any lessons from other airdrops?

It has been more than 3 months since 3️⃣SS was taken. They didn't even properly say that they received SS. They continued to favor and use people because the community is everything.

4️⃣They ate money at VIP parties and yachts. In the last 2 weeks, they included projects such as Lens into their ecosystem and gave them millions of tokens.

5️⃣Omnibus NFT will come to all of you, they added it as a criterion, saying don't go and buy it. For some reason, on the same NFT SS date, there was a serious price conflict.

6️⃣By making the maximum limit 100k, they have created a great injustice in income distribution.

7️⃣9,000 wallets received 25% of the airdrop coins. Believe me, these are not those who are active on the network, but those who have high money and are just idle. By sending 60% of the tokens to only 50,000 wallets, they acted with the motto that the community is empty, not the community is everything.

8️⃣Now it has started to act like StarkNet, which we criticize, by banning accounts that criticize it.

9️⃣Discord roles were insignificant, but those who managed there received more than 100k. Why did you cast people in roles then?

🔟Congratulations, if you support the use of all platforms in the network, you are not eligible. Because instead of trading on the platforms on the network, if you held 50 to 100 dollars of x tokens, you could win an airdrop.