Yesterday (Friday), we completed 3 strategies, 1 long ETH, 2 short BTC, 1 take profit, 2 breakeven.

The first order was a long ETH order with an average price cost of 3440. Although it surged to 3550, we insisted on the iron rule of adding positions and running away, and finally exited at cost. To be honest, the strategy’s adding position point was 3418 at that time, and there was no transaction at the adding position point, but it was changed later.

The second order was a short BTC order with a cost of 96500. When it first pulled back to 96000, we took a 30% profit, and then pulled it up to breakeven. Using 100 times leverage, the profit was 50%.

The third order was a short BTC order with an average price cost of 97000. According to the strategy, the adding position point was also eaten, so we could only insist on the iron rule of cost breakeven and exit. Later, it fell to around 96800, which gave us a lot of opportunities to run.

Summary: Because our strategy of adding positions is not used to make money, but to get out of the market at a certain cost. By adhering to this iron rule, we rarely lose a lot of money in the contract market. Why do we have to wait for liquidation or stop loss when we can break even? So I see many fans or friends often say that they are very responsible to do so, and they don't want others to have to wait for a hard stop loss. 👉ETH多单策略复盘 👉返佣