There are so many technical analysis methods in trading, which one is better to learn?

Most fans learn techniques such as trend analysis, indicator analysis, line drawing, etc., but these single uses are single signals, that is, they belong to high-probability events

It may be 60%, 70%, or 80%, so in essence, it is still easy to lose money

There are still many fans who learn the wrong way, because they like to search and learn online. In fact, most of the content above is theoretical, and it is often easy to suffer losses when applied to real trading.

Let's take the simplest example, such as MACD

Most fans' cognition is to go long on golden cross and go short on dead cross

I also made this issue clear to some fans. MACD golden cross goes long and dead cross goes short is not valid, because there are often divergence expectations or M expectations

For example, MACD zero-up golden cross goes long, which is theoretically correct, but there is a situation that needs to be avoided here, that is, when the top diverges from the M expectation, at this time the golden cross you go long, just go long at the divergence high point, go long and smash the market

There is also dead cross short, zero-down dead cross short, and a situation that needs to be avoided is the bottom divergence W Or Dragonfly Touch Water W Expectation, otherwise you will be at the lowest point as soon as you go short and start to rebound

I have also posted many such analyses in the community, including many techniques. Among the techniques, the one with the highest winning rate and closest to 100% is currently only Dragonfly Touch Water W Expectation

The winning rates of other methods are not high, but they are relatively high probabilities. They are not suitable for novices. Novices can only use Dragonfly Touch Water W Expectation

Friends who are currently confused and have no direction in making orders can follow me, leave a comment 1, and make progress together

#非农人数大幅升温 #加密市场急跌 #9月小非农数据高于预期 #HBO纪录片或揭示中本聪身份