Lawyer Liu Zhengyao’s article points out that the following models can easily be identified by judicial authorities as suspected of pyramid scheme crimes: hyping up pseudo-contract token products, through the hierarchical relationship built into the smart contract (or actually adopted during offline promotion), and eventually forming a pyramid-like Ponzi scheme structure through hierarchical rebates or team compensation methods; false pledge mining, through publicity, inducing investors to invest more mainstream coins, and the higher the offline computing power promoted and developed, the higher the future returns; token exchange model, absorbing investors’ mainstream coins, and later defrauding investors of mainstream coins by inducing investors to exchange mainstream coins for platform coins. In terms of specific models, there are pyramid schemes such as inducing investors to promote offline members to invest. Read the full text:
