A traditional view is that "one yang changes three views", but I think this statement has actually become outdated inadvertently.

A few years ago, people were still in the ignorant period of love, and pulling the price was indeed the most effective way. But this year, if you have played on-chain MEME, you will find that pulling the price can attract attention, but more and more people can calmly look at the project party's pulling the price alone.

It's not that the leeks have become smart, but they are really afraid of being cut. Behind the change of three views by one yang, in fact, it is necessary to move upward for a long time before the three views can be formed, but now if you look for it in all the currencies on the Internet, it is difficult to find the grand occasion of a bunch of hundred-fold coins like Binance in 21 years. Basically, Binance is thankful for pulling one or two times.

As for the chain, let alone, the life of a MEME is as short as a few minutes and as long as a few days. It is exaggerated in the last second, and the pool is withdrawn in the next second.

There are too many cuts, so some people have summarized the typical law of this round of bull market, that is, no one takes over.

Therefore, behind the expectation of "one yang changes three views", think about three questions:

If you are a banker, when the leeks are cautious and fearful, how sure are you that your pull-up will not turn into someone else's shipment?

If you are a leeks, are you sure that the banker is super rich and has a pattern, and only pulls up the market without smashing it, which means he is full of love for the world? Will he also want to run first?

If you are a VC, after your 10x-100x chips are finally unlocked, are you willing to wait for the project party to do things, the banker to pull up the market, and the retail investors to FOMO, or just sell it on the spot first?

If everyone thinks this way, it will be difficult to copycat, a highly tense game of running away from the virus.