I spent the 1000u I earned on Trump yesterday on in-game purchases... To be honest, achieving this level of quality in chain games is quite reassuring. As long as the economic system doesn't collapse, I can keep playing every season. #Castile @Castileofficial
Yes, if you enter now, you should observe more before investing.
Crystal Bazin J8dQ
--
Just entered the dark world, why does this chain game seem more and more like a scheme for retail investors? The trading volume is too low, NFTs can only be traded by players themselves, and the project team does not buy back.
In recent days, I have read a lot of community players' analysis of blockchain games. Before seeing a successful case, there is actually no empirical basis for what blockchain games should do. Now there are only lessons learned. Learning lessons does not mean that doing the opposite is the right way.
In addition, whether it is the players who have learned lessons, or the project parties, or the big players or the retail investors, from different perspectives, it is not certain who has been taught a lesson. Sometimes you are the nectar of mine.
Game assets are issued on the chain for players to trade freely, which means that the data cannot be rolled back after the operation of the chain game. Therefore, after the chain game is launched, there is no opportunity to do the opposite immediately if problems occur, because the transactions that have already occurred on the chain cannot be rolled back.
Therefore, the survival of the chain game is the greatest success, and I agree with this point. The listing of tokens is also an opportunity to revive, and there is still a narrative to tell in the next season.
Genshin Impact is a domestic anime-style game with art similar to The Legend of Zelda, and there are many innovations in gameplay. I spend money in Genshin Impact to pull for five-star characters and special weapons.
Jc-livemore
--
Where did the 6000u for Genshin Impact go? I feel that this kind of copycat game costs at most 60u.
brilliantcrypto can now go to the official website to download the game and play; the game of Three Kingdoms War is still in testing, and currently, you can only earn some points by completing tasks in the small program activities on Telegram. You can find the link to that Telegram small program on the official Twitter.
Cathy姐玩链游
--
The report mentioned <Kui Sanguozhi War> and <Brilliant Crypto>. I have played the latter, but I didn't get much out of it. I have sold the pickaxe and made a small profit. Now I am looking forward to the former.
Insights into the Japanese Web3 market: government policies, trends of large enterprises and outlook for 2025
The currency in the game has no value unless it is TGE'd onto the chain and issued. However, Wizzwoods officially announced that they will issue the currency in Q1 of 2025, so we can look forward to it.
Arden Farhart Vn99
--
Sister, isn't the zoo in the Tabizoo project a real token? Why are mining machines appearing again?
Blockchain games have two evaluation systems: how fun they are + whether they can earn money
First of all, if a blockchain game is not fun, I definitely won't play it. If the game genre is not to my liking, there’s no need to force it. For example, I’m not a fan of shooting games, I’m not very interested in MOBA games, and I won’t touch football or basketball games. If the game's quality is poor, the art is unattractive, the programming is unstable, and there are too many bugs, and after several tests, there’s no improvement, then it’s better to stay away. This applies to both blockchain games and Web2 games.
I consider myself a whale player. If a blockchain game is very grindy but has profit, I will hire a professional player to assist. I will play when I have time, and if I don’t, I will leave it to the hired player. If it can earn money, that’s great; the game assets are purchased by myself, and the timing for cashing out depends on judgment.
If a blockchain game is not grindy and still has profits, then there’s no need to hire a professional player; just play it myself, like casual blockchain games on Telegram.
But if a blockchain game is not profitable, will I still play it? This depends on the design and operation of the blockchain game.
If a blockchain game is fun and of high quality but is not profitable, is there enough player quantity in the game to support a community? If very few people are playing the game, most will probably leave after a few tries. A blockchain game project that has no long-term profit effect cannot sustain itself and can only turn into a Web2 game (there are already some cases of blockchain games turning into Web2 games).
If a blockchain game causes players to lose money, will they still play this blockchain game?
This depends on whether the project causes most people to lose money or most people to earn money, or whether the large players earn while the small players lose, or the large players lose while the small players earn. Whether the player is a large or small player also determines whether he/she wants to stay and continue playing.
Many large blockchain games now are seasonal, and profits and losses are periodic. Gameplay values can be adjusted, and players and project parties are constantly in a tug-of-war, so the direction of value adjustments may also change.
My own position is: losing 6000u in a well-made blockchain game is an acceptable amount; after all, you can spend 6000u in Genshin Impact. If you are happy playing in the game and within the player community, spending money is justifiable.
So basically, I’m playing a brand new blockchain game now, starting with a good initial investment of 500u, and spending up to 6000u is about right. Subsequently, if the project is operating very well, I will slowly increase my investment; of course, I might also reduce my investment (if the game doesn’t rug and I have time to reduce my investment).
YQG
--
The notion that blockchain gaming is dead is a fallacy: Web3 games do not equal 'short-term wealth'
With the success of Seraph's dark TGE and the dramatic drop in the price of $Seraph, coupled with the continued decline in various blockchain game's gold mining revenues and the devaluation of various assets, market sentiment has plummeted. Voices such as 'blockchain gaming is dead', 'the biggest scam', 'preparing to change careers', and 'better to play dirt dogs' are emerging endlessly. However, Cat Brother has a different view and has drawn a clear opposite conclusion: **Now is the best investment opportunity in blockchain gaming.**
### **Reflections in a Market Slump: Is blockchain gaming really 'dead'?**
Cat Brother himself has faced setbacks in this market over the past two years, with the blockchain game projects he invested in either going to zero or losing money, which made him waver at one point, even considering exiting the blockchain gaming circle. Recently, I also complained in the community: 'It's better to trade coins than to do blockchain games.'
Here is my profit calculation table for the Seraph9 set NFT Necromancer for the week, which still shows a slight profit today.
The other 5 accounts are all stopped, including: the 9-piece Mage with a treasure value of 128, the 3-piece Mage with a treasure value of 47, and 3 individual NFTs with a treasure value of 21+.
It's not that I want to stop; there is simply no profit. With profit-sharing, even the power leveling is no longer active.
Seraph's gameplay updates are coming quickly, and veteran players have a profit incentive; even if it's just a slight profit, new players will join in.
If the entry threshold for new players is lowered a bit more, then there will be even more new players. For example, renting is an effective way to lower the entry cost for brand new players. I originally thought that Season 1 would introduce Genesis NFT rentals to reduce the entry cost for new players to practice and test the waters, but now the Genesis has been decomposed a lot, so Genesis rentals can no longer be done.
I believe that the operators and game planners of Seraph can come up with better gameplay to attract new players. In the past six months, I have seen the Seraph team organizing exhibitions worldwide, hosting player meetups, and collaborating with Binance Chain for AMAs and offline game trials. The hard work has resulted in a large number of Web3 users and new players discovering the blockchain game Seraph. As the hope of the entire village, the game content and playability of Seraph are undeniably excellent, continuously experimenting and iterating, with a promising future ahead!
#I haven't sold any of my NFTs and I've even added to my holdings
If you are an experienced player of blockchain games, I have a KYC player group. You need to send me a screenshot of the blockchain game NFTs you hold for record keeping.
Franklyn Deus obWe
--
Is there a group or something for quick communication?
Tomorrow the coins pledged at the exchange will be unlocked, it seems likely that there will be a further decline, and afterwards the project team should pump the price.
We need to observe it again. Now the zoo coins mined in the game can only be obtained by drawing blind boxes. If you draw 6 kinds of materials, you can synthesize the MiniNode mining machine for mining Tabi. Only then can the mining machine mine Tabi tokens.
阿珂
--
It’s worthless? What’s the point? The public chain tokens don’t even explain how to map them.