For some partners with a smaller principal, I tend to be aggressive in accumulating the first pot of gold at the right time, but accumulating principal is very important, and preserving the principal is even more crucial. Profit not taken is equivalent to no profit at all; money earned but not spent is equivalent to not having earned, as it is just an increase in numbers that can be wiped out at any time in the market.

Accumulating principal can be somewhat aggressive, but it must be in the right direction.

Short-term profits gained through high leverage are no different from gambling. In gambling, if you successfully pass the "three barriers" three times in a row, you can multiply your bet by eight. Isn't that easier and with higher fault tolerance than high leverage, allowing you to accumulate faster? But can such methods be used continuously? Can one profit long-term through this method? This is what traders should consider.

First, consider the long-term feasibility of the model, and then execute the operation.

If one seeks high leverage to accumulate principal first, it will eventually create a wrong path dependency. Having earned ten times before just because of luck, and thinking that next time I can still earn ten times with this method, traders may only see the profit at ten times while ignoring that the trial and error process has already caused the principal to exceed that ten times.