Interesting classification by @Forbes. But that's not wrong, with DEX having the biggest TVL in Curve but crvUSD being the biggest revenue generator - Yield Generation is a fair category!
Another good one to try for leveragooors is this bot https://www.curvebot.fi/curve-leverage-lending/: doing leverage using http://crvusd.curve.fi and managing the position.
Looking at this dashboard https://dune.com/mrblock_buidl/Curve.fi - looks like over 1 year we had ~190M CRV locked (while emissions over 1 year (going to LPs) were 163M CRV.
Most of those 190M CRVs were locked in the last 2 months
Apparently @DeFiSaver has an excellent tool which can migrate loans between platforms (for smart wallets). Excellent for rate arbitrage, as well as lowering liquidation price in one click
That's how protection from dips on https://t.co/oOi48fvtQi or https://t.co/oRLTRckhyx works. This position went below liquidation price, and the system was selling collateral for stablecoins or bought collateral back on the way up.
After the drop, user had to repay few % of debt to avoid hard liquidation, and system had enough health to travel back up. So position is back from liquidation (yay), but lost some 4% of collateral due to wild market action.
On http://crvusd.curve.fi, some positions went fully soft-liquidated, but they are still open! They will be automatically converted to ETH on the way up (if they keep watching their health)
Missed this yesterday. It appears, that Uni3-style concentrated liquidity could not keep up with markets (moving it makes "impermanent loss" permanent), while Curve liquidity in crypto pools is automatically managed.
So while Curve is an AMM, Uni3 is closer to orderbooks
Tricrypto pools are printing well in such volatility. TricryptoUSDT has params which lead to higher fee APR on average, TricryptoUSDC - to higher volume