#BTC☀ #ETH🔥🔥🔥🔥 #ZKsync空投争议 #LayerZero #撸毛攻略

With the issuance of zksync and Layerzero’s tokens, all the “king-level” projects in this round of “bull market” have completed their airdrops.

Amid controversies such as "PUA community, insider trading, and unfair distribution", after zksync and Layerzero were listed on the exchange, their market conditions became more sluggish than the other.

Especially L0, the stinky penguin's dishonest manipulation and playing of the community finally brought down the mood, and zro fell directly from 5u to below 3u at the opening of Binance.

Recently, He Yi, the actual helmsman of Binance, made a statement that seemed to announce the end of the "money-pulling" industry.

what happened?

After the airdrop of zk and zro tokens was confirmed, many users asked Binance to postpone the listing of these tokens due to poor relations with the community and retail investors.

But it failed to achieve its goal. After that, the two tokens performed poorly after listing.

In addition, Binance launches new coins too frequently at this stage, and most of them fall after they are launched.

There are many comments online that blame Binance for the poor market conditions. The core point of the article is:

- Binance launched new products too quickly and at unreasonable prices, which drained the market's blood and led to a sluggish market;

- Binance is the industry leader and should shoulder its industry responsibilities and strictly control the listing of new coins;

- Binance should listen more to the opinions of the community and consider the feelings of retail investors. After all, before CZ joined, he always talked about "users first". You must not forget your roots;

- With great power comes great responsibility. Binance cannot be profit-driven at this point, but must consider the overall situation...

In fact, there is no need for He Yi to respond. Any trader with a little bit of common sense knows where these accusations are wrong.

What does He Yi’s response indicate?

First of all, there is nothing wrong with the content of He Yi’s response. The exchange is neutral and pricing is not determined by the exchange... These are common sense.

He Yi's biggest problem was telling the truth.

The current blockchain is a behemoth built on the sands of “speculation” without a solid foundation. It can collapse in an instant.

This is actually a kind of potential consensus. In this round of bull market, the industry innovation is lackluster. The once star L2 project immediately became a ghost chain after the airdrop. Dex, lending, domain names, NFT market... all kinds of homogeneous applications were copied and pasted and continued to defraud high amounts of financing;

Is there a problem with this pattern? It was originally fine:

- The project owner can negotiate with VCs based on the impressive data generated by the money laundering party;

-VCs see the truth but don’t speak out, forming cliques and factions to continue to pull capital into the same boat;

- The jackpot party sees the high amount of financing and thinks the project is promising, so they increase their efforts to continue jackpotting;

- Finally, the new coin is listed, everyone starts the propaganda machine, retail investors take over at high prices, and the game is over...

First of all, ask yourself, why do you want to participate in the "crypto track"?

Isn’t it because I’ve heard all kinds of myths about getting rich quickly? (And then I think I can do it too)

How many users really believe in blockchain? (Those who do believe in it may only buy the first and second coins.)

When you are trading, don’t you know the fact that the crypto market is difficult to be regulated by the web2 world?

It is precisely because of the fact that blockchain has "no (weak) supervision" that gray behaviors such as meme coins, ICO, NFT issuance, clamp attacks, etc. have given birth to one wealth myth after another.

When making money, I think regulation is a hindrance

When I get beaten, I feel the need for supervision.

Could you please not be such a giant baby?

Second, Binance is an exchange and a profit-making organization.

After all, Binance is a company. We are thankful that the company is responsible to its employees and shareholders. You said it should also be responsible to you gamblers? Isn't that a little funny?

(Some people say that He Yi speaks like Li Jiaqi. Sorry, I think what Li Jiaqi said at the time was not wrong. If you can't afford it, just buy something else. What's there to complain about? Market pricing and freedom of buying and selling. When the anchor said "Family members, charge!", the "family members" were in quotation marks. Don't really think of them as family members.)

For example, if you buy rotten fish and shrimp in a market that is not managed by the Market Supervision and Administration Bureau, the most you can do is to fight with the stall owner. If you are arrogant, he will return the money. The market will not care about such a rotten thing. He has collected the stall fee. Of course, he also has to consider his reputation, but what if the profit from the stall far exceeds those "reputations"? What if other market reputations are worse? Is it necessary for him to protect the rights of consumers who bought rotten fish and shrimp?

Conclusion: Is there an end to hair-pulling?

Of course not. Open TikTok and Bilibili and take a look, you will see tutorials everywhere about how to earn gold through games, make money online, get coupons, grab Moutai, etc. Although you must be aware that the teacher who teaches you the online money-making tutorials is actually making money from you.

However, it is undeniable that there are many arbitrage opportunities in the web2 world, otherwise, niche businesses such as online earning and game gold farming would not be able to become an industry.

Even the buying and selling of KFC and Luckin Coffee coupons on Xianyu has become an industry. Who would believe you if you say that web3 profiteering is over?

It’s just that all industries have cycles. LuMao started with uniswap, went through famous projects such as dydx, ENS, and op, and reached its climax when it came to arbitrum. Countless studios, urban unemployed vagrants, student groups, and mothers poured into the track, and there were more wolves than meat.

In addition, the macro liquidity injection is reduced, VCs are raising valuations, and retail investors are waiting and watching...

The profits from ripping off the profits will be reduced, and loss-making arbitrageurs will be driven out, and the shrinkage of the industry scale is inevitable.

But if you understand that the essence of the "outsourced product testing department" + "outsourced marketing department" of VCs and project parties, and that their behavior can be evaluated, then you will know that the "outsourced product testing department" + "outsourced marketing department" of VCs and project parties will never end.

Brain is a good thing, I hope you have one too.

So the question is, what should I do next?

Follow me and the answer will be revealed in the next article!