The steps to launch a project:

1. A few people come together to discuss a concept

2. Fundraising begins to attract people to the platform

3. Create a false prosperity in the supply chain

4. Launch tokens to attract users for buying in

5. Sell off, exchange for yachts, luxury homes, villas

6. The remaining tokens are gradually unlocked over several years to collect welfare

7. Change the concept and do it again

8. Once the selling is completed, on-chain active users are in double digits

9. Occasionally come out to brainwash you: our project's goal is to change the world, in the end, the investors find that the world has not changed, only the wallets of the big players have changed, while we have indeed emptied our wallets for their so-called 'dreams' of change.

When coming to the crypto space, don’t talk to me about changing the world; if you hear that phrase, you can block them.

We are here to make money, not to change the world. The things that truly change the world will not happen in the crypto space, like Musk's Starlink, brain-machine interfaces, and catgirl robots.

We just want a relatively fair asset issuance method and protocol. Although I know there is no absolute fairness, at least you should show us a relative 'fairness', right? Even if you don't support it, there's no need to suppress it, right?

POW, BRC20, and RUNES are the few protocols I currently find to be the fairest. One represented by Bitcoin as POW, and two represented by BTC native assets: BRC20 and the RUNES protocol.

The preaching has been going on for a long time. Now about half of the people basically despise VC tokens, and very few new users will buy them, even if you keep pushing. Because everyone knows what the ultimate fate is.

If three years later someone suddenly brings up that there was a person on Twitter continuously advising everyone not to buy VC tokens, always talking about what a fair launch protocol is, I wonder how that person is doing now. That would be enough for me...