The fairness of memes is meaningless; where is the core point of memes?

Retail investors can never achieve fairness in the capital market. The less they get, the more they desire, ultimately being ruthlessly harvested by the so-called fairness.

This morning, I observed a new meme coin that adopted a gas burning fair distribution model, but after experiencing a surge, the price plummeted and entered a period of fluctuation. Looking at the comments under the project's Twitter, there were various complaints, mainly about why the price hasn't risen yet.

If the fair distribution is only given to retail investors, then what's the point of raising the price? 🤣 Always remember, 10,000 retail investors are not worth a single powerful large fund. The financial market is always determined by a small number of large funds because being small and concentrated has a stronger impact. The influence of 10 people with 10 million is far greater than 10,000 people with 1,000 each.

Retail investors are somewhat ridiculous; they want to obtain low-priced tokens early while also expecting large funds to come and lift them up, which is simply upside down, living in a dream.

So, where is the core point of memes?

Only narrative content matters. Content is the first principle of memes; everything else is nonsense. Content is the foundation of memes. Only retail investors believe that fairness is the most important, because they can never achieve fairness in the capital market. The less they get, the more they desire, ultimately being ruthlessly harvested by the so-called fairness.