The trap of offline U-coin transactions
Yesterday, a fan revealed his unfortunate experience to me. He tried to conduct an offline U-coin transaction, and the other party paid in cash, which was exactly the transaction method he expected.
However, during the transaction, the other party provided an OE payment address. The fan did not suspect anything and transferred the U-coin to the address, but found that the other party's OE account was frozen and the U-coin was locked in the account. This obviously triggered the risk control mechanism of OE and led to a dispute.
The fan insisted that there was no problem with his U-coin, and it was the other party's behavior on OE that triggered the risk control. The other party insisted that there was no problem with his account, and it was the problem with the U-coin transferred by the fan that led to the risk control. Both parties insisted on their own opinions and the dispute was fierce.
In the end, the other party of the transaction refused to pay cash and prepared to leave. Of course, the fan disagreed, so he called the police. But after the police arrived, they could only mediate, and the other party finally took the cash, and the fan's U-coin was still frozen in the other party's OE account.
This incident once again reminds us that there are many traps and risks in offline U-coin transactions. When conducting such transactions, we must remain highly vigilant and act with caution. At the same time, we must also understand that in the current volatile market environment, blind action can never bring real opportunities.
Again, if you don’t know what to do in the bull market, click on my avatar, follow me, bull market spot planning, contract password, free sharing.
I need fans, you need reference. It’s better to follow than to guess blindly.