Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
CoinsRadar_Net币市雷达
--10k views
See original
What is the logic of bank risk control for selling U? How to avoid it? Selling U on the exchange will either be frozen by the judiciary or be subject to this kind of bank risk control. What is the principle here? It is just that the source of funds is not clean, there is no other reason. The source of funds for exchange currency dealers is the money paid to them by people who buy U. And who are these people who buy U? We can know their source of funds by analyzing their crowd. Who is still buying U on the exchange now? Those who engage in capital disks, project pyramid schemes, third-party fraud (being deceived), online gambling, and normal retail investors speculating in currency contracts. Which of these five groups can you name? According to the probability, each 20%, then 80% of currency dealers will encounter gray and black funds, and only 20% can encounter retail investors themselves. But with so many currency dealers competing, can you rob others? And people with absolutely perfect data, consistent with the flow, consistent with novice buying coins, and consistent with recording videos, must be victims of telecommunications fraud, which is why currency dealers are often black. You think the funds flow is the money that the currency dealer directly transfers to you. The actual funds flow: the currency dealer just accepts the funds from above and then transfers them to you through his own account. There may be funds from retail investors in it, but is it important? Back to the topic, the bank account from which these funds come must have problems. Either it has been warned by the anti-fraud system, or it involves black funds above level 6. It’s just that you have not been judicially frozen, but the bank’s internal system has already labeled you as a high-risk person. Think about it, if you have sold U several times, the bank system big data directly sees you and other high-risk people trading and receiving circulating funds. What do you think the big data will label you? It may be an accidental injury once, but what about the second and third time? Which normal good person will have financial transactions with these people? According to your reserved occupation and identity information, you have not done good things. Now Alipay and WeChat payment functions are so developed. After all, there is a problem with a normal ordinary person using a bank card account. This is the reason for risk control, and why your comprehensive score for credit cards and loans is insufficient. How to avoid risk control? That is to make a note of how the money came from. The currency dealer should cooperate with you to make a note, such as borrowing money, so that you can make a promissory note after risk control, provided that the currency dealer is familiar and trusted. If you are not familiar with it and cannot contact the currency dealer later, you can only cancel the bank card, and you will never be able to open a card of this bank again. It will be too difficult if it is a salary card or a mortgage card. Sometimes, it is really such a simple thing. It is so simple to lift risk control and non-counter. The bank has no right to freeze your funds, but they can refuse to provide you with services. You have no way to do anything. The bank is just a company. The currency dealers in the on-site exchange are already a high-risk profession. Their bank accounts have long been included in the risk list. No matter how awesome you are, there will be problems when you trade with them, unless you accept non-real-name payment, but in this case you will receive a black hand, and there is no solution. Follow me! Get more information

What is the logic of bank risk control for selling U? How to avoid it?

Selling U on the exchange will either be frozen by the judiciary or be subject to this kind of bank risk control. What is the principle here?

It is just that the source of funds is not clean, there is no other reason.

The source of funds for exchange currency dealers is the money paid to them by people who buy U. And who are these people who buy U? We can know their source of funds by analyzing their crowd.

Who is still buying U on the exchange now?

Those who engage in capital disks, project pyramid schemes, third-party fraud (being deceived), online gambling, and normal retail investors speculating in currency contracts. Which of these five groups can you name?

According to the probability, each 20%, then 80% of currency dealers will encounter gray and black funds, and only 20% can encounter retail investors themselves. But with so many currency dealers competing, can you rob others?

And people with absolutely perfect data, consistent with the flow, consistent with novice buying coins, and consistent with recording videos, must be victims of telecommunications fraud, which is why currency dealers are often black.

You think the funds flow is the money that the currency dealer directly transfers to you.

The actual funds flow: the currency dealer just accepts the funds from above and then transfers them to you through his own account. There may be funds from retail investors in it, but is it important?

Back to the topic, the bank account from which these funds come must have problems. Either it has been warned by the anti-fraud system, or it involves black funds above level 6. It’s just that you have not been judicially frozen, but the bank’s internal system has already labeled you as a high-risk person.

Think about it, if you have sold U several times, the bank system big data directly sees you and other high-risk people trading and receiving circulating funds. What do you think the big data will label you?

It may be an accidental injury once, but what about the second and third time?

Which normal good person will have financial transactions with these people? According to your reserved occupation and identity information, you have not done good things. Now Alipay and WeChat payment functions are so developed. After all, there is a problem with a normal ordinary person using a bank card account.

This is the reason for risk control, and why your comprehensive score for credit cards and loans is insufficient.

How to avoid risk control?

That is to make a note of how the money came from. The currency dealer should cooperate with you to make a note, such as borrowing money, so that you can make a promissory note after risk control, provided that the currency dealer is familiar and trusted.

If you are not familiar with it and cannot contact the currency dealer later, you can only cancel the bank card, and you will never be able to open a card of this bank again. It will be too difficult if it is a salary card or a mortgage card.

Sometimes, it is really such a simple thing. It is so simple to lift risk control and non-counter. The bank has no right to freeze your funds, but they can refuse to provide you with services. You have no way to do anything. The bank is just a company.

The currency dealers in the on-site exchange are already a high-risk profession. Their bank accounts have long been included in the risk list. No matter how awesome you are, there will be problems when you trade with them, unless you accept non-real-name payment, but in this case you will receive a black hand, and there is no solution.

Follow me! Get more information

Disclaimer: Includes thrid-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
0
Replies 6
Explore the lastest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Relevant Creator

Explore More From Creator

--
比特币和山寨币同时被抢,18.88枚比特币被认定为虚拟财产成功索赔,价值50万的山寨币暴跌九成后遭放弃追索#内容挖矿 上海市第一中级人民法院(下称 “上海一中院”)公开宣判了一起比特币涉外财产损害赔偿纠纷上诉案,案件涉及18.88个比特币。上海一中院认定,通过不合法手段取得的比特币,应当全部返还或折价赔偿。 据法院公布,四名涉案人员采用控制手机、限制自由的方式,并殴打和威胁对方两人,迫使对方将所持比特币等虚拟币转入指定账户,双方均有一名外籍人员,纠纷涉及比特币18.88个、天空币6466个。 一审期间,四名涉案人员同意返还获取的虚拟货币,以案发当时加密货币行情网站的价格进行索赔,比特币为4.2万元一个,天空币为80.34元一个,共涉约131万元人民币。 最终,四人因非法拘禁罪获有期徒刑。现其不服并提起上诉,称法律并不认可比特币、天空币的财产属性,故对方不具有物权返还请求权。 上海一中院在二审中审理后认定,比特币属于网络虚拟财产,应从法律上予以保护。 上海一中院提出,根据《中华人民共和国民法总则》第一百二十七条规定,法律对网络虚拟财产的保护持肯定态度;因此比特币属于网络虚拟财产,应从法律上予以保护。同时,要获得比特币,既需要投入物质资本用于购置与维护具有相当算力的专用机器设备等,也需要耗费相当的时间成本,其间凝结了人类抽象的劳动力;比特币可以进行转让并产生经济收益。因比特币具有价值性、稀缺性、可支配性等特点,具备权利客体的特征及虚拟财产的商品属性,符合虚拟财产的构成要件。 此次上海一中院判定的案件中,比特币索赔诉求达成。 本案中,交易网站非我国认可的虚拟币交易价格信息发布平台,不能将该网站上比特币的交易价格数据直接作为损失的认定标准。二审庭审中,因双方认可,若返还不能,同意按照4.2万元一个的价格计算赔偿金额,所涉约合79.2万。公开数据显示,比特币单价目前在6.6万元左右。 与此同时,二审中,价值50万的山寨币暴跌九成,被侵害方主动放弃对6466个天空币的追索,系对自身权利的处分,于法不悖,上海一中院予以准许。 关注我!获得更多资讯😘
--

Latest News

View More

Trending Articles

View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs