What are the current pain points of DeSci projects and how to break the deadlock?
🧪 DeSci is driven from the Top Down, so consensus is a process of descent rather than emergence from the bottom. Therefore, when leaders are unable to shout orders or rally support, the sector becomes lifeless. This is unlike Bottom Up AI Agents, which build an $army from the ground up, forcing the upper levels to pay attention, increase investment, and accumulate contracts.
🐁 The intellectuals are too heavy with scholar's spirit, which manifests as an obsession with self-delusions of small achievements. I also went through this phase during my doctoral studies, pursuing vanity, emptiness, perfectionism, and procrastination.
🧪 DeSci is an innovation in financial fundraising within the knowledge domain, focusing on capital operations. Don't get too deep into the play; the crypto space is not enough to force changes in the physical world. If there is any, only memes can influence real-world ideologies, such as $pythia. Remember: only memes can break the circle; project tokens find it hard to do so. Why? Issues with chip structure and community supply-demand relationships.
🐁 Assets with weak meme attributes can only gain attention from on-chain capital and find it difficult to break through to off-chain traffic. The playstyle is too singular, and most PhDs are good students, high-knowledge cogs prepared to work under the ruling class's arrangements. Most will not make money, nor have they ever made big money. Their abilities in organizational governance, interest distribution, and resource mobilization are extremely weak, and they show little innovation in financial plays unless they come from politically and economically influential families. Most from non-political and business backgrounds need years of social honing and tempering to understand the essence of business.
🧪 There is a sense of disgust towards the operation of the play, believing that financial volatility is evil. In reality, the play is just consensus; common prosperity is the consensus. The play is the source of belief in the crypto community, and the financial community should do what it is meant to do.
🐁 Perfectly inherits the culture of freeloading in the academic circle. In fact, in academia, stealing ideas and rushing to publish are rampant, and they like to use the method of painting a big academic pie to exploit cheap, low-class labor, while also being petty. This is an inevitable style of working brought about by the meticulous nature of needlework, being overly particular to produce a useless high-scoring paper.
🧪 These advantages that may work well in academia become disadvantages in business. This is why the asset depth and consensus breadth of AI agents and CultMeme are better, as they are down-to-earth, have an $army, a sense of push, and combat power.
Ways to break the deadlock:
⚔️ Humble yourself to learn from the Ai Agent team and projects; I learned a lot of practical experience and key node advancement methods while engaging with @swarms_corp.
🔥 Boldly invest in market budgets, marketing, rallying support, and community engagement. Don’t waste time on useless research during a bear market. Research yielding practical results takes years, while a bull market lasts only a few months. Don’t waste public funds and attention; wasting is fraud.
⚔️ Learn from @bioprotocol and @StadiumScience_ , do daily CX, do useful things, and build a strong combat-ready $army.
🔥 Take advantage of the moment to add AI concepts and collaborate with AI project parties to develop AI4Sci narratives and features. @swarms_corp and @sporedotfun are doing great in this regard, looking forward to the subsequent DeSci layout.
DeSci is still very early, so don’t give up.