In popular tracks like public chains, MEME, AI, gaming, L2, and DEFI, projects within the same track can also perform differently. For example, in MEME, People, Doge, and Floki are all well-known MEMEs, but People has seen very little growth, while Doge and Floki have skyrocketed.
Why is this? Have you guys thought about this question?
In terms of narrative: for example, Doge gained traffic and funding injection because of Musk's mention, triggering market speculation, and the price naturally improved.
In terms of project community team operations: the community team actively creates narratives or promotes progress, for example, after being listed on Binance, they expand to platforms like CB, Bithumb, Upbit, etc.
In terms of strong market makers: there is substantial support from powerful market makers.
Meeting these conditions makes valuation and growth more promising; otherwise, it will be limited. This rule applies equally to public chains, gaming, DEFI, and other tracks, after all, any coin's speculation relies on traffic and funds.
Let's talk about public chains: not every public chain project can succeed; looking at the latest cycle, SOL and INJ have survived and reached new historical highs once again.
But what about the others?
In addition to the points mentioned above, there are also investment teams, such as OMNI and ALT; SOL, INJ, SUI, APT, OMNI, ALT, etc., are all invested by JUMP, you can search for JUMP to learn more.
This is a top-tier forex market maker globally.
Let's not say too much; the growth of SOL, SUI, and INJ has already proven everything.