I just heard an interesting statement in the comment section: The reason why real estate cannot take off is because of the sudden drop in population.

This statement is certainly true, but it is only part of the factor. I agree with the people-centered concept, but the normal operation of the entire society and sustained economic growth are not only determined by large population. China's population 30 years ago was not that large, otherwise there would be no need for family planning. The real maintenance of social and economic growth depends on the system!

We can deduce a logic (I am not an expert, please be gentle):

At present, investment costs and consumer spending have become higher, and exports cannot be increased; wages and incomes have not changed; medical and pension protection has not kept up, and employment pressure is great.

Locking up real estate is equivalent to blocking more than 200 ecological springs, so the market currency cannot circulate, and when payment is not proportional to income, these social types (industry and commerce, taxation, schools, hospitals, banks, shopping malls, major merchants) The artifact becomes a blood-sucking vessel.

Another major factor is that funds will gather more quickly towards resources. A 900 billion figure some time ago is a very realistic portrayal.

When the majority of people's funds are concentrated towards a small number of people, under the circumstances of uneven distribution, the market economy will wither even if the overall economy remains unchanged. All walks of life are unable to create blood and circulate. With the implementation of the urbanized economic circle, the cost of urban living for most people is higher, and it is difficult for them to live. How can we talk about plans to create people.

Therefore, young people in their 80s and 90s are destined to be a generation of bulls and horses. It is good to strive for progress, it is okay to endure it, or it is okay to lie down.

In short, it is better to live than die!