There is a trading system but it cannot be executed. Is it really a human problem?
In the trading circle, I often hear some people sighing: "I still don't have my own trading system" or "I have a great trading system, but I can't control myself, I just can't abide by my own discipline, and I can't consistently execute it." The principal is always being worn out, getting less and less, and even when encountering a rare opportunity, I dare not enter the market again.
In short, all misfortunes in trading seem to be attributed to "not having your own trading system" or "not being able to stick to your own trading system." Accordingly, finding an effective trading system and sticking to it seems to solve all problems. Is this really the case?
Here I would like to attribute system problems to the system, and people's problems to people. Only with appropriate attribution can we solve problems in a targeted manner.
If it is a system problem, just use Mingge's trading system that has been verified by thousands of transactions. If it is an execution problem, standardize and unique the entry and exit signals and form operating habits through a lot of training. Will you be unable to execute your habits? At this time, you will feel uncomfortable if you do not execute your habits.
Many people actually do not know what the results of their trading system will be after thousands of transactions are executed, or what range of retracement it will experience. They execute blindly, and then after several consecutive stop losses, they begin to worry about gains and losses. When they encounter a trend, they want to hold on but are worried about profit loss.
This actually means that one does not see the overall trading system from a global perspective, and does not understand what kind of trading system is worth executing.
If there is one and only one criterion for a good trading system, it is that it can be replicated in large quantities, that is, using specific rules that can be described, and it can still be profitable after thousands of transactions and the drawdown is controlled very small.
First of all, many people do not have a formal trading system, but they do have a substantive trading system.
These traders all stubbornly stick to their own trading system; moreover, this trading system is not "found" but rooted in the trader's "body" from the very beginning.
These traders who make mistakes all have their own trading system. Although the trader himself may not be aware of it, let alone clearly express it, this trading system must be endogenous, otherwise it would be impossible to accurately "copy" the results again and again and steadily lose money.
Because humans have animal nature, animals will strengthen or change their behavior patterns when they receive feedback from the outside world.
The biggest trap in trading is that the market will sometimes reward your mistakes and constantly tempt you to break your own trading rules. Breaking the rules and still making money is often the most terrifying. After tasting the sweetness, it will strengthen the feedback link, and you will keep trying and keep breaking your own trading rules, which will make you go further and further, and the end result is that your principal will continue to decrease.
There are also some traders whose trading systems have errors and omissions. The system itself is too broad and only summarizes some "principle" guidance. It does not go into specific operation signals and there is a lot of ambiguity in execution. For example, when building a trading system, some traders just think about it from the perspective of experience and logic in their brains and think that a certain trading method is feasible.
However, this "feasibility" actually only takes into account the advantages of certain methods, but does not fully consider its defects in unfavorable situations and the problem of signal clarity during execution. The more vague the signal is, the more difficult it is to execute. If it cannot be executed, then the trading system will be useless.
Therefore, a good trading system must be profitable after thousands of transactions and have good control over drawdowns, and be able to withstand the test of long-term large samples. At the same time, the signals must be highly clear and unique, easy to execute, and the logic behind it must be irrefutable and interconnected, and able to withstand repeated questioning.
If you want to save a few years of time and cost, you might as well use Mingge's. The market is big enough to accommodate traders. I wish you a smooth transaction and a successful landing soon.
I am Brother Ming. I have been in the trading market for more than ten years. If you have any questions about trading, you can contact Brother Ming.
![](https://public.bnbstatic.com/image/pgc/202407/fa5eb5c5abd4280bbcb8f9ccfcbc82f3.png)