Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
ENSIGN TRADING
--4.1k views
Head & Shoulder This pattern is broken to two ✌🏻 1. Head & Shoulder 2. Inverted Head & Shoulder Head & Shoulder works as a pattern for us to identify a sell setup. We will sell once we see the shaping of the 1st Shoulder & Head. So, we will buy at the 2nd part of the Shoulder. Head & Shoulder: SELL ONLY Inverted Head & Shoulder also functions the same but we look for a buy setup at the 2nd Shoulder. Inverted: BUY ONLY

Head & Shoulder

This pattern is broken to two ✌🏻

1. Head & Shoulder

2. Inverted Head & Shoulder

Head & Shoulder works as a pattern for us to identify a sell setup. We will sell once we see the shaping of the 1st Shoulder & Head.

So, we will buy at the 2nd part of the Shoulder.

Head & Shoulder: SELL ONLY

Inverted Head & Shoulder also functions the same but we look for a buy setup at the 2nd Shoulder.

Inverted: BUY ONLY

Disclaimer: Includes thrid-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
0
Explore the lastest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Relevant Creator
LIVE
@ENSIGNTRADING

Explore More From Creator

--
What Is the Scaling Problem? The scaling problem refers to the limitations of a blockchain’s transaction throughput, which ultimately affect the speed and costs of transactions. The scaling problem is tied to how a decentralized network handles blocks of transactions, which depend on factors such as its block size and block time, which is the time it takes to create a new block. This problem became evident after users of Bitcoin, the first blockchain network, experienced delays in transaction settlements and increases in fees whenever usage of the network spikes. In 2015, the Bitcoin blockchain limited its block size to one megabyte (MB), which was later increased to 2 MB. While the increase in block size slightly alleviated Bitcoin’s scaling problem, many developers cautioned against the types of changes that could potentially make the protocol centralized. This is because every transaction carries data, which means that more transactions also means more data per block, which would ultimately result in requiring miners to have massive disk spaces in order to store a copy of the full Bitcoin blockchain. The Bitcoin community ended up deciding against greatly increasing block size, as it traded decentralization for scalability, which was considered the wrong approach by many. Therefore, solving the scaling problem has become an uphill task, taking years of time and effort. The scaling problem is exacerbated by the fact that scaling a blockchain network requires proper consensus and coordination between the different parties involved such as the developers, miners and community. However, months of moving back and forth between these groups can still end in disagreements. In such a case, the process may lead to a hard fork where one team activates the upgrade and branches off the main network. While unscaled blockchains can stay as they are, they will face detrimental consequences like a continuous decrease of transaction speed and increase in costs, as well users leaving for a more scalable network.
--

Latest News

View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs