Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
ENSIGN TRADING
--830 views
What Is a P2P DEX? P2P DEX is short for peer-to-peer decentralized exchange. It is a blockchain-based application that supports peer-to-peer trading, which is any trade that occurs directly between two crypto traders without third-party involvement. P2P DEXs propel the autonomous and free mindset in crypto, moving away from financial institutions and traditional finance. Unlike automated market maker (AMM) DEXs (e.g. PancakeSwap or Uniswap) where users can trade with each other indirectly via liquidity pools, users of P2P DEXs (e.g. Liquality or AtomicDEX) transact directly with each other in a trustless environment. There are several benefits to using a P2P DEX over AMM DEXs and centralized crypto exchanges. P2P DEXs have a clear security advantage because they allow users to trade funds from their own non-custodial wallets. AMM DEXs require market makers to lock funds into smart contracts. They are more vulnerable to hacks because large sums of funds are often pooled into a single crypto address. As seen with incidents like the $650 million Ronin bridge hack, AMM DEXs often have a small group of validators who are responsible for keeping liquidity provider funds secure. Essentially, P2P DEXs provide a more trustless, decentralized and secure solution for liquidity providers because funds aren’t pooled together. While P2P DEXs sometimes lack liquidity, the main benefit is that users, especially liquidity providers, don’t need to worry about issues like impermanent loss or smart contract exploits. Secondly, many of them use trading tools, like atomic swaps, which makes these platforms cross-chain and cross-protocol compatible. For example, two users can trade Bitcoin (BTC) with Ethereum (ETH) or Shiba Inu (SHIB) with Dogecoin (DOGE), across their respective blockchains without needing a trusted third party. Additionally, P2P DEXs also provide a greater degree of anonymity compared to centralized exchanges since platforms don’t require users to complete a formal registration process or submit personal information.

What Is a P2P DEX?

P2P DEX is short for peer-to-peer decentralized exchange. It is a blockchain-based application that supports peer-to-peer trading, which is any trade that occurs directly between two crypto traders without third-party involvement.

P2P DEXs propel the autonomous and free mindset in crypto, moving away from financial institutions and traditional finance.

Unlike automated market maker (AMM) DEXs (e.g. PancakeSwap or Uniswap) where users can trade with each other indirectly via liquidity pools, users of P2P DEXs (e.g. Liquality or AtomicDEX) transact directly with each other in a trustless environment.

There are several benefits to using a P2P DEX over AMM DEXs and centralized crypto exchanges.

P2P DEXs have a clear security advantage because they allow users to trade funds from their own non-custodial wallets. AMM DEXs require market makers to lock funds into smart contracts. They are more vulnerable to hacks because large sums of funds are often pooled into a single crypto address. As seen with incidents like the $650 million Ronin bridge hack, AMM DEXs often have a small group of validators who are responsible for keeping liquidity provider funds secure.

Essentially, P2P DEXs provide a more trustless, decentralized and secure solution for liquidity providers because funds aren’t pooled together. While P2P DEXs sometimes lack liquidity, the main benefit is that users, especially liquidity providers, don’t need to worry about issues like impermanent loss or smart contract exploits.

Secondly, many of them use trading tools, like atomic swaps, which makes these platforms cross-chain and cross-protocol compatible. For example, two users can trade Bitcoin (BTC) with Ethereum (ETH) or Shiba Inu (SHIB) with Dogecoin (DOGE), across their respective blockchains without needing a trusted third party.

Additionally, P2P DEXs also provide a greater degree of anonymity compared to centralized exchanges since platforms don’t require users to complete a formal registration process or submit personal information.

Disclaimer: Includes thrid-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
0
Explore the lastest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Relevant Creator
LIVE
@ENSIGNTRADING

Explore More From Creator

--
What Is the Scaling Problem? The scaling problem refers to the limitations of a blockchain’s transaction throughput, which ultimately affect the speed and costs of transactions. The scaling problem is tied to how a decentralized network handles blocks of transactions, which depend on factors such as its block size and block time, which is the time it takes to create a new block. This problem became evident after users of Bitcoin, the first blockchain network, experienced delays in transaction settlements and increases in fees whenever usage of the network spikes. In 2015, the Bitcoin blockchain limited its block size to one megabyte (MB), which was later increased to 2 MB. While the increase in block size slightly alleviated Bitcoin’s scaling problem, many developers cautioned against the types of changes that could potentially make the protocol centralized. This is because every transaction carries data, which means that more transactions also means more data per block, which would ultimately result in requiring miners to have massive disk spaces in order to store a copy of the full Bitcoin blockchain. The Bitcoin community ended up deciding against greatly increasing block size, as it traded decentralization for scalability, which was considered the wrong approach by many. Therefore, solving the scaling problem has become an uphill task, taking years of time and effort. The scaling problem is exacerbated by the fact that scaling a blockchain network requires proper consensus and coordination between the different parties involved such as the developers, miners and community. However, months of moving back and forth between these groups can still end in disagreements. In such a case, the process may lead to a hard fork where one team activates the upgrade and branches off the main network. While unscaled blockchains can stay as they are, they will face detrimental consequences like a continuous decrease of transaction speed and increase in costs, as well users leaving for a more scalable network.
--

Latest News

View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs