Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
Naveed Tariq
--ใƒป15 views
๐๐ˆ๐† ๐†๐ˆ๐…๐“ ๐…๐Ž๐‘ ๐˜๐Ž๐” ๐‚๐‹๐ˆ๐‚๐Š ๐“๐–๐Ž ๐Œ๐˜ ๐๐ˆ๐๐๐„๐ƒ ๐๐Ž๐’๐“๐’ ๐†๐„๐“ ๐‘๐„๐–๐€๐‘๐ƒ ๐”๐๐“๐Ž ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ$๐Ÿ’ฐ๐ŸŽ In 1929 the stock market crashed 90% In 1973 the stock market crashed 50% In 1987 the stock market crashed 35% In 2008 the stock market crashed 55% In 2020 the stock market crashed 35% And recovered to all-time highs each and every time. Since 1926, the stock market has returned an average 10.5% per year. Never let short-term fear control long-term decisions. #etf ย #BinanceLaunchpool ย #bitcoinhalving ย #SHIB ย #BullorBear

๐๐ˆ๐† ๐†๐ˆ๐…๐“ ๐…๐Ž๐‘ ๐˜๐Ž๐” ๐‚๐‹๐ˆ๐‚๐Š ๐“๐–๐Ž ๐Œ๐˜ ๐๐ˆ๐๐๐„๐ƒ ๐๐Ž๐’๐“๐’ ๐†๐„๐“ ๐‘๐„๐–๐€๐‘๐ƒ ๐”๐๐“๐Ž ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ$๐Ÿ’ฐ๐ŸŽ

In 1929 the stock market crashed 90%

In 1973 the stock market crashed 50%

In 1987 the stock market crashed 35%

In 2008 the stock market crashed 55%

In 2020 the stock market crashed 35%

And recovered to all-time highs each and every time.

Since 1926, the stock market has returned an average 10.5% per year.

Never let short-term fear control long-term decisions.

#etf ย #BinanceLaunchpool ย #bitcoinhalving ย #SHIB ย #BullorBear

ฮ‘ฯ€ฮฟฯ€ฮฟฮฏฮทฯƒฮท ฮตฯ…ฮธฯ…ฮฝฯŽฮฝ: ฮ ฮตฯฮนฮปฮฑฮผฮฒฮฌฮฝฮตฮน ฮณฮฝฯŽฮผฮตฯ‚ ฯ„ฯฮฏฯ„ฯ‰ฮฝ. ฮ”ฮตฮฝ ฮตฮฏฮฝฮฑฮน ฮฟฮนฮบฮฟฮฝฮฟฮผฮนฮบฮฎ ฯƒฯ…ฮผฮฒฮฟฯ…ฮปฮฎ.ย ฮ”ฮตฮฏฯ„ฮต ฯ„ฮฟฯ…ฯ‚ ฮŒฯฮฟฯ…ฯ‚ ฮบฮฑฮน ฯ€ฯฮฟฯ‹ฯ€ฮฟฮธฮญฯƒฮตฮนฯ‚.
0
ฮ‘ฮฝฮฑฮบฮฑฮปฯฯˆฯ„ฮต ฯ€ฮตฯฮนฮตฯ‡ฯŒฮผฮตฮฝฮฟ ฮณฮนฮฑ ฮตฯƒฮฌฯ‚
ฮ•ฮณฮณฯฮฑฯ†ฮตฮฏฯ„ฮต ฯ„ฯŽฯฮฑ ฮณฮนฮฑ ฮผฮนฮฑ ฮตฯ…ฮบฮฑฮนฯฮฏฮฑ ฮฝฮฑ ฮบฮตฯฮดฮฏฯƒฮตฯ„ฮต 100โ€“USDT ฯƒฮต ฮฑฮฝฯ„ฮฑฮผฮฟฮนฮฒฮญฯ‚!
ฮฎ
ฮ•ฮณฮณฯฮฑฯ†ฮฎ ฯ‰ฯ‚ ฮฟฮฝฯ„ฯŒฯ„ฮทฯ„ฮฑ
ฮฎ
ฮฃฯฮฝฮดฮตฯƒฮท
ฮฃฯ‡ฮตฯ„ฮนฮบฯŒฯ‚ ฮดฮทฮผฮนฮฟฯ…ฯฮณฯŒฯ‚
LIVE
@crypto_trader00

ฮ‘ฮฝฮฑฮบฮฑฮปฯฯˆฯ„ฮต ฯ€ฮตฯฮนฯƒฯƒฯŒฯ„ฮตฯฮฑ ฮฑฯ€ฯŒ ฯ„ฮฟฮฝ ฮ”ฮทฮผฮนฮฟฯ…ฯฮณฯŒ

๐—•๐—œ๐—š ๐—š๐—œ๐—™๐—ง ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—ฌ๐—ข๐—จ ๐—–๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—ง๐˜„๐—ผ ๐— ๐˜† ๐—ฃ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฃ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜๐˜€ ๐—”๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—š๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐—จ๐—ฝ๐—ง๐—ผ 10$ USDT๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ’ฐ๐ŸŽ Are projects with randomly nested narratives worth doing? โ“ Now that the market has developed to a certain stage, various popular concepts have emerged, such as: re-staking, RWA, Depin, inscriptions and various texts, L2, ZK, etc. (1) For some projects, you will find out when you come into contact with them: How can this guy do everything? (2) For other projects, you will find out when you come into contact with them: Can this guy do this? I just happened to come into contact with three of them recently. They do everything. Their roadmaps have everything. They have everything. This situation needs to be viewed from two perspectives. I will establish the first perspective and stand from the second perspective to see: (1) Within the community: WOC! Good news, the project party is doing things and is still doing a lot of things (2) Outside the community: What exactly is this project going to do? ๐Ÿ“Doing everything, the sense of direction is poor. Mountain birds and fish have different paths. Two completely different narratives are forced together. What else can the other party do except wanting to take advantage of the market hotspot to get you on board with fomo so that he can take your money? If a project can figure out the G-spot of 1-2 users, it is very impressive (however, nesting too many narratives is also a way to figure out the G-spot, hhh) It is not impossible to do such projects, but the other party's motivation for listing them in this way must be that the concept is greater than the reality. If you dance with wolves, you are either a beast or a piece of meat It is possible that some projects did not develop in the past, and now they want to start a new narrative, but if they start too many stoves, then their original intention is not to cook ingredients, but to use you as ingredients.
--