LIVEHCLivess
@hclivess
Следвани
Последователи
Харесано
Споделено
A slight bounce here and then we will see.
LIVESunnybaba
--
Currently, I guess we should just leave the crypto world. Something is really wrong somewhere, this market is not working as normal, both the pro and amateur analysis are failing, currently market is not respecting any strategies, Currently all the indicators are giving wrong signals. Something is definitely wrong somewhere. Pls let’s reserve our capitals, better days ahead.
No
LIVEKrypto_ Alchemy
--
Бичи
🔴 DELISTING DRAMA OF $FET $OCEAN $AGIX 🔴
The recent delisting announcement of FET, OCEAN, and AGIX by Binance led to a market frenzy, causing a significant drop in FET’s price from 2.1 to 1.1. However, the subsequent announcement of a review and potential relisting of these projects caused a nearly 50-60% rebound in prices, leaving many investors surprised and confused. Some market observers believe this could have been a strategic move to manipulate prices, allowing short-sellers to buy back at lower prices. However, from a long-term perspective, this event could be seen as an opportunity to weed out weak hands, leaving behind committed investors and potentially strengthening the project’s foundation. This incident underscores the importance of staying informed and understanding market dynamics when investing in cryptocurrencies.
#ASI #FET #CryptoPCEWatch #CryptoPCEWatch #Write&Earn
The recent delisting announcement of FET, OCEAN, and AGIX by Binance led to a market frenzy, causing a significant drop in FET’s price from 2.1 to 1.1. However, the subsequent announcement of a review and potential relisting of these projects caused a nearly 50-60% rebound in prices, leaving many investors surprised and confused. Some market observers believe this could have been a strategic move to manipulate prices, allowing short-sellers to buy back at lower prices. However, from a long-term perspective, this event could be seen as an opportunity to weed out weak hands, leaving behind committed investors and potentially strengthening the project’s foundation. This incident underscores the importance of staying informed and understanding market dynamics when investing in cryptocurrencies.
#ASI #FET #CryptoPCEWatch #CryptoPCEWatch #Write&Earn
all this trash is exiting at -15%
don't believe the lies of people who are trying to rob you
don't believe the lies of people who are trying to rob you
LIVEAngel Crypto Airdrop
--
START Buying some $FET , $AGIX and $OCEAN
• They are going to be converted to a new AI coin named $ASI
• It is high time you put some cash in these coins.
• ASI going to be the biggest AI coin in the market with 3X FDV these coins have.
•Its a suggestion, not a financial advice 👌🏻
• They are going to be converted to a new AI coin named $ASI
• It is high time you put some cash in these coins.
• ASI going to be the biggest AI coin in the market with 3X FDV these coins have.
•Its a suggestion, not a financial advice 👌🏻
This looks reasonable
LIVEdream chaser jtk
--
I remember sharing an update on the entire crypto market cap
Now, we have started dumping, though it’s just the beginning
Guys, isn’t it funny how $BtC has similar charts with that of the entire crypto market cap?
Now, tell me, do you believe $Btc will hit 30k$ region again or not?
Comment with your reasons
Now, we have started dumping, though it’s just the beginning
Guys, isn’t it funny how $BtC has similar charts with that of the entire crypto market cap?
Now, tell me, do you believe $Btc will hit 30k$ region again or not?
Comment with your reasons
You've been told countless times that the bull market is over but you never learn
LIVEAnkita-426
--
Мечи
BTC Flash Crash: Panic Selling Spurred by Alarming Economic Data By US Shaking Market Confidence ($1.37 Trillion)!
Bitcoin (BTC) experienced a dramatic drop of 1.16% within mere minutes, triggering a panic sell-off among investors.
This sudden decline, which brought BTC/USDT down to 68,718.89 (-1.30%), has been attributed to the release of troubling U.S. economic indicators.
On June 11, 2024, the U.S. unemployment data revealed a higher-than-expected jobless rate, shaking market confidence and sparking concerns about economic stability.
Compounding the unease was a report of unreleased $518 billion losses in U.S. banks, which surfaced simultaneously, heightening fears of a broader financial crisis.
The impact of these revelations was immediately evident in the cryptocurrency market.
As the leading cryptocurrency, Bitcoin's market cap, which stands at $1.37 trillion, felt the pressure, reflecting broader market anxieties.
The trading volume surged as investors rushed to liquidate their positions, wary of further declines.
Bitcoin, currently ranked No.1 by market dominance at 54.22%, has 19.71 million BTC in circulation out of a maximum supply of 21 million BTC.
This sell-off is a stark reminder of the volatility inherent in the crypto markets, often exacerbated by external economic factors.
CoinMarketCap data shows that despite this setback, Bitcoin remains a significant player with a fully diluted market cap of $1.46 trillion.
However, the swift drop to 68,718.89 underscores the sensitivity of digital assets to macroeconomic news.
This incident highlights the importance of staying informed and prepared for sudden market shifts, especially in an asset class as volatile as cryptocurrencies.
The data presented is for informational purposes only.
It is provided by CoinMarketCap, and shown on an "as is" basis, without representation or warranty of any kind.
Have you followed me yet?☺️☺️
#Binance200M #TopCoinsJune2024 #altcoins #WhalesWinning #TopCoins2025 $BTC
Bitcoin (BTC) experienced a dramatic drop of 1.16% within mere minutes, triggering a panic sell-off among investors.
This sudden decline, which brought BTC/USDT down to 68,718.89 (-1.30%), has been attributed to the release of troubling U.S. economic indicators.
On June 11, 2024, the U.S. unemployment data revealed a higher-than-expected jobless rate, shaking market confidence and sparking concerns about economic stability.
Compounding the unease was a report of unreleased $518 billion losses in U.S. banks, which surfaced simultaneously, heightening fears of a broader financial crisis.
The impact of these revelations was immediately evident in the cryptocurrency market.
As the leading cryptocurrency, Bitcoin's market cap, which stands at $1.37 trillion, felt the pressure, reflecting broader market anxieties.
The trading volume surged as investors rushed to liquidate their positions, wary of further declines.
Bitcoin, currently ranked No.1 by market dominance at 54.22%, has 19.71 million BTC in circulation out of a maximum supply of 21 million BTC.
This sell-off is a stark reminder of the volatility inherent in the crypto markets, often exacerbated by external economic factors.
CoinMarketCap data shows that despite this setback, Bitcoin remains a significant player with a fully diluted market cap of $1.46 trillion.
However, the swift drop to 68,718.89 underscores the sensitivity of digital assets to macroeconomic news.
This incident highlights the importance of staying informed and prepared for sudden market shifts, especially in an asset class as volatile as cryptocurrencies.
The data presented is for informational purposes only.
It is provided by CoinMarketCap, and shown on an "as is" basis, without representation or warranty of any kind.
Have you followed me yet?☺️☺️
#Binance200M #TopCoinsJune2024 #altcoins #WhalesWinning #TopCoins2025 $BTC
We need more Mahmood analysts and their deranged delusions
LIVE
Crypto Ahmet
--
Бичи
😱🫨The reason for the decline in Bitcoin and #altcoins has been revealed: News that shook the market
While everything seemed to be fine in #Bitcoin the sharp declines in the evening hours dragged the price to the level of 68 thousand dollars. What was behind the decline?
Things bounced back in the evening, with Bitcoin touched 72 thousand times today. The declines that started at 15.30 UTC deepened in the following parts and the price retreated to 68 thousand 400 dollars.
Why is Bitcoin falling?
The external reason for the establishment of Bitcoin was the emergence of data on agricultural employment in the United States today. With the data added at 15.30, it was reported that there was an increase of 272 thousand in employment in May. The expectation was that this figure would be 182 thousand.
Employment forecasts were greatly exceeded, hopes that the Fed would cut interest rates in July were dashed, allowing the dollar to gain value. Additionally, markets now price the possibility of a rate cut in September as 45 percent. This rate was 56 percent before the employment data was announced.
On the other hand, sales in some cryptocurrencies deepened with the Youtube live broadcast of GameStop phenomenon Roaring Kitty. In the live broadcast watched by more than 600 thousand people, Fenomen did not make any sensational announcements or statements as expected. GameStop shares then lost more than 40 percent of their value. While the decline in GME, the meme coin with the same name, exceeded 50 percent, many meme coins also lost double-digit value.
Finally, the decline in Bitcoin led to positions being cut at a loss in 400 million transactions in leveraged transactions. According to Coinglass, the number of loss-making users who added derivatives has approached 150 thousand.
#BTC #binance
While everything seemed to be fine in #Bitcoin the sharp declines in the evening hours dragged the price to the level of 68 thousand dollars. What was behind the decline?
Things bounced back in the evening, with Bitcoin touched 72 thousand times today. The declines that started at 15.30 UTC deepened in the following parts and the price retreated to 68 thousand 400 dollars.
Why is Bitcoin falling?
The external reason for the establishment of Bitcoin was the emergence of data on agricultural employment in the United States today. With the data added at 15.30, it was reported that there was an increase of 272 thousand in employment in May. The expectation was that this figure would be 182 thousand.
Employment forecasts were greatly exceeded, hopes that the Fed would cut interest rates in July were dashed, allowing the dollar to gain value. Additionally, markets now price the possibility of a rate cut in September as 45 percent. This rate was 56 percent before the employment data was announced.
On the other hand, sales in some cryptocurrencies deepened with the Youtube live broadcast of GameStop phenomenon Roaring Kitty. In the live broadcast watched by more than 600 thousand people, Fenomen did not make any sensational announcements or statements as expected. GameStop shares then lost more than 40 percent of their value. While the decline in GME, the meme coin with the same name, exceeded 50 percent, many meme coins also lost double-digit value.
Finally, the decline in Bitcoin led to positions being cut at a loss in 400 million transactions in leveraged transactions. According to Coinglass, the number of loss-making users who added derivatives has approached 150 thousand.
#BTC #binance
You fools are lost. You think that crypto inflow to the exchanges is bullish and crypto outflow to wallets is berish. The only double digit thing is your IQ.
LIVEAimee Nishihara j2MQ
--
Мечи
🔻🔻🔻🔻BREAKING 🚀🚀🚀🚀
I am sure something big is cooking.
only God knows why #etherium is stuck is same place?
even Ema and rsi is below 44.
it will drastically fall tonight.
ALWAYS DYOR Before Investment
I am sure something big is cooking.
only God knows why #etherium is stuck is same place?
even Ema and rsi is below 44.
it will drastically fall tonight.
ALWAYS DYOR Before Investment
part 4:
The protocol proposed in this article allows untraceable pseudonymous entities to cooperate with each other more efficiently, by providing them with a medium of exchange and a method of enforcing contracts. The protocol can probably be made more efficient and secure, but I hope this is a step toward making crypto-anarchy a practical as well as theoretical possibility. ------- Appendix A: alternative b-money creation One of the more problematic parts in the b-money protocol is money creation. This part of the protocol requires that all of the account keepers decide and agree on the cost of particular computations. Unfortunately because computing technology tends to advance rapidly and not always publicly, this information may be unavailable, inaccurate, or outdated, all of which would cause serious problems for the protocol. So I propose an alternative money creation subprotocol, in which account keepers (everyone in the first protocol, or the servers in the second protocol) instead decide and agree on the amount of b-money to be created each period, with the cost of creating that money determined by an auction. Each money creation period is divided up into four phases, as follows: 1. Planning. The account keepers compute and negotiate with each other to determine an optimal increase in the money supply for the next period. Whether or not the account keepers can reach a consensus, they each broadcast their money creation quota and any macroeconomic calculations done to support the figures. 2. Bidding. Anyone who wants to create b-money broadcasts a bid in the form of <x, y> where x is the amount of b-money he wants to create, and y is an unsolved problem from a predetermined problem class. Each problem in this class should have a nominal cost (in MIPS-years say) which is publicly agreed on. 3. Computation. After seeing the bids, the ones who placed bids in the bidding phase may now solve the problems in their bids and broadcast the solutions. 4. Money creation.
The protocol proposed in this article allows untraceable pseudonymous entities to cooperate with each other more efficiently, by providing them with a medium of exchange and a method of enforcing contracts. The protocol can probably be made more efficient and secure, but I hope this is a step toward making crypto-anarchy a practical as well as theoretical possibility. ------- Appendix A: alternative b-money creation One of the more problematic parts in the b-money protocol is money creation. This part of the protocol requires that all of the account keepers decide and agree on the cost of particular computations. Unfortunately because computing technology tends to advance rapidly and not always publicly, this information may be unavailable, inaccurate, or outdated, all of which would cause serious problems for the protocol. So I propose an alternative money creation subprotocol, in which account keepers (everyone in the first protocol, or the servers in the second protocol) instead decide and agree on the amount of b-money to be created each period, with the cost of creating that money determined by an auction. Each money creation period is divided up into four phases, as follows: 1. Planning. The account keepers compute and negotiate with each other to determine an optimal increase in the money supply for the next period. Whether or not the account keepers can reach a consensus, they each broadcast their money creation quota and any macroeconomic calculations done to support the figures. 2. Bidding. Anyone who wants to create b-money broadcasts a bid in the form of <x, y> where x is the amount of b-money he wants to create, and y is an unsolved problem from a predetermined problem class. Each problem in this class should have a nominal cost (in MIPS-years say) which is publicly agreed on. 3. Computation. After seeing the bids, the ones who placed bids in the bidding phase may now solve the problems in their bids and broadcast the solutions. 4. Money creation.
part 3:
If a contract concludes without dispute, each party broadcasts a signed message "The contract with SHA-1 hash H concludes without reparations." or possibly "The contract with SHA-1 hash H concludes with the following reparations: ..." Upon the broadcast of all signatures, every participant credits the account of each party by the amount of his maximum reparation, removes the contract account, then credits or debits the account of each party according to the reparation schedule if there is one. 5. The enforcement of contracts. If the parties to a contract cannot agree on an appropriate conclusion even with the help of the arbitrator, each party broadcasts a suggested reparation/fine schedule and any arguments or evidence in his favor. Each participant makes a determination as to the actual reparations and/or fines, and modifies his accounts accordingly. In the second protocol, the accounts of who has how much money are kept by a subset of the participants (called servers from now on) instead of everyone. These servers are linked by a Usenet-style broadcast channel. The format of transaction messages broadcasted on this channel remain the same as in the first protocol, but the affected participants of each transaction should verify that the message has been received and successfully processed by a randomly selected subset of the servers. Since the servers must be trusted to a degree, some mechanism is needed to keep them honest. Each server is required to deposit a certain amount of money in a special account to be used as potential fines or rewards for proof of misconduct. Also, each server must periodically publish and commit to its current money creation and money ownership databases. Each participant should verify that his own account balances are correct and that the sum of the account balances is not greater than the total amount of money created. This prevents the servers, even in total collusion, from permanently and costlessly expanding the money supply. New servers can also use the published databases to synchronize with existing servers.
If a contract concludes without dispute, each party broadcasts a signed message "The contract with SHA-1 hash H concludes without reparations." or possibly "The contract with SHA-1 hash H concludes with the following reparations: ..." Upon the broadcast of all signatures, every participant credits the account of each party by the amount of his maximum reparation, removes the contract account, then credits or debits the account of each party according to the reparation schedule if there is one. 5. The enforcement of contracts. If the parties to a contract cannot agree on an appropriate conclusion even with the help of the arbitrator, each party broadcasts a suggested reparation/fine schedule and any arguments or evidence in his favor. Each participant makes a determination as to the actual reparations and/or fines, and modifies his accounts accordingly. In the second protocol, the accounts of who has how much money are kept by a subset of the participants (called servers from now on) instead of everyone. These servers are linked by a Usenet-style broadcast channel. The format of transaction messages broadcasted on this channel remain the same as in the first protocol, but the affected participants of each transaction should verify that the message has been received and successfully processed by a randomly selected subset of the servers. Since the servers must be trusted to a degree, some mechanism is needed to keep them honest. Each server is required to deposit a certain amount of money in a special account to be used as potential fines or rewards for proof of misconduct. Also, each server must periodically publish and commit to its current money creation and money ownership databases. Each participant should verify that his own account balances are correct and that the sum of the account balances is not greater than the total amount of money created. This prevents the servers, even in total collusion, from permanently and costlessly expanding the money supply. New servers can also use the published databases to synchronize with existing servers.