Binance Square
LIVE
Carl Duchesneau knXN
@WimarBot
I got into crypto since 2017 in the spot market and then got into futures. Since then I have experienced 8 liquidations and vowed never to experience it again
يتابع
المتابعون
إعجاب
تمّت مُشاركتها
جميع المُحتوى
LIVE
--
ترجمة
Exchanges Must Protect Their Users From Reckless Developer BehaviorWe are in the crypto world because we believe this industry is the future. We choose Binance as a place to trade because we believe they will do what is best for their customers. However, several events in the crypto world have caused huge losses caused by irresponsible developer behavior. We believe the exchange is trying to get better, that's why we are all still here. However, it seems that this is not enough. There are still actions by developers that harm consumers which are not resolved fairly. Remember the LUNA case. Incompetent and evil developers have harmed so many people. Not only for LUNA holders but also for everyone in the industry because the LUNA case caused a massive price collapse. Now there is an event (I won't call it a case) of merging 3 AI tokens, namely FET, OCEAN, and AGIX. On June 14, 2024, #Binance made an announcement that they will support the merger process of Fetch.ai (FET), Ocean Protocol (OCEAN) and SingularityNET (AGIX). You can read more detail at the following link: [FET, OCEAN, AGIX merge](https://www.binance.com/en/support/announcement/binance-will-support-the-fetch-ai-fet-ocean-protocol-ocean-and-singularitynet-agix-token-merge-e485541c370240adba3929fded74f269) In summary, the contents are: OCEAN and AGIX tokens will assume the ticker of FET at Binance.All OCEAN and AGIX tokens will be swapped to FET at a ratio of: 1 OCEAN = 0.433226 FET; 1 AGIX = 0.433350 FET. For users who hold the delisted tokens on spot, it seems certain that they will be converted. However, for the future market, considering that users do not hold assets directly, the question arises whether the losses incurred as a result of the developer's actions will be replaced or not? Should, if we want to be fair, for future positions opened before June 14th all losses incurred should be reimbursed. Who is charged with compensating for the loss? In my opinion, it is the developer's side, whether with tokens or other mechanisms. This situation is getting worse because the merger process occurs at a time when the market is experiencing a correction. $BTC experienced a correction of around 12% from June 14 to June 25 (when automatic settlement was carried out). {spot}(BTCUSDT) Although not always, a drop in BTC will be followed by a drop in prices for most altcoins. So, this merge action was carried out at the wrong time. When most people were panicking because of the uncertain market situation, an announcement suddenly appeared that made the situation worse. Therefore, this incident proves that users are always at the most vulnerable. Just imagine, currently AI is one of the most popular narratives on the market so AI-related tokens have a large trading volume. Most people are bullish on AI related coins, including FET, AGIX and OCEAN. Not only holding it in the spot but also opening a position in the future market. Then suddenly they were asked to force it to close when they were getting a negative PNL. So, it should be a lesson for exchanges (all exchanges) to have rules regarding developer actions regarding their tokens listed on exchanges. Meanwhile, for incidents that have occurred, the exchange should force developers to compensate all losses experienced by users in all markets. If not, can we guess what will happen if $OP , $ARB , and Matic decide to merge to form the SUPERL2 token? {future}(ARBUSDT) {future}(OPUSDT) #DelistingNotice

Exchanges Must Protect Their Users From Reckless Developer Behavior

We are in the crypto world because we believe this industry is the future. We choose Binance as a place to trade because we believe they will do what is best for their customers.
However, several events in the crypto world have caused huge losses caused by irresponsible developer behavior.
We believe the exchange is trying to get better, that's why we are all still here. However, it seems that this is not enough. There are still actions by developers that harm consumers which are not resolved fairly.
Remember the LUNA case. Incompetent and evil developers have harmed so many people. Not only for LUNA holders but also for everyone in the industry because the LUNA case caused a massive price collapse.
Now there is an event (I won't call it a case) of merging 3 AI tokens, namely FET, OCEAN, and AGIX.
On June 14, 2024, #Binance made an announcement that they will support the merger process of Fetch.ai (FET), Ocean Protocol (OCEAN) and SingularityNET (AGIX).
You can read more detail at the following link: FET, OCEAN, AGIX merge
In summary, the contents are:
OCEAN and AGIX tokens will assume the ticker of FET at Binance.All OCEAN and AGIX tokens will be swapped to FET at a ratio of:
1 OCEAN = 0.433226 FET;
1 AGIX = 0.433350 FET.
For users who hold the delisted tokens on spot, it seems certain that they will be converted.
However, for the future market, considering that users do not hold assets directly, the question arises whether the losses incurred as a result of the developer's actions will be replaced or not?
Should, if we want to be fair, for future positions opened before June 14th all losses incurred should be reimbursed. Who is charged with compensating for the loss? In my opinion, it is the developer's side, whether with tokens or other mechanisms.
This situation is getting worse because the merger process occurs at a time when the market is experiencing a correction.
$BTC experienced a correction of around 12% from June 14 to June 25 (when automatic settlement was carried out).

Although not always, a drop in BTC will be followed by a drop in prices for most altcoins.
So, this merge action was carried out at the wrong time. When most people were panicking because of the uncertain market situation, an announcement suddenly appeared that made the situation worse.
Therefore, this incident proves that users are always at the most vulnerable.
Just imagine, currently AI is one of the most popular narratives on the market so AI-related tokens have a large trading volume. Most people are bullish on AI related coins, including FET, AGIX and OCEAN. Not only holding it in the spot but also opening a position in the future market. Then suddenly they were asked to force it to close when they were getting a negative PNL.
So, it should be a lesson for exchanges (all exchanges) to have rules regarding developer actions regarding their tokens listed on exchanges.
Meanwhile, for incidents that have occurred, the exchange should force developers to compensate all losses experienced by users in all markets.
If not, can we guess what will happen if $OP , $ARB , and Matic decide to merge to form the SUPERL2 token?



#DelistingNotice
ترجمة
Catch a falling knife in MANTA#Manta has experienced a decline of more than 70% since printing ATH. Now the price is at Fibo 0.786 and seems to be holding up quite well. I know opening a buy position when selling pressure is still high is like catching a falling knife. However, with the potential approval of an $ETH ETF by the SEC in the near future, Ethereum-based layer 2 projects will also likely get sufficient liquidity. So, for example, if you believe that this project has a future, even if the purchase price at this point does not work out well, this is not a bad price for accumulation. However, if you only want to trade for the short or medium term then this also has a good risk to reward ratio. Let's say you place SL below Fibo 0.786, namely 0.7 while the profit target is at 2.4, then your risk and reward ratio is 8 to 1. $MANTA {spot}(MANTAUSDT) #ETHETFsApproved #CryptoPCEWatch #MtGoxJulyRepayments

Catch a falling knife in MANTA

#Manta has experienced a decline of more than 70% since printing ATH.
Now the price is at Fibo 0.786 and seems to be holding up quite well.
I know opening a buy position when selling pressure is still high is like catching a falling knife.
However, with the potential approval of an $ETH ETF by the SEC in the near future, Ethereum-based layer 2 projects will also likely get sufficient liquidity.
So, for example, if you believe that this project has a future, even if the purchase price at this point does not work out well, this is not a bad price for accumulation.
However, if you only want to trade for the short or medium term then this also has a good risk to reward ratio.
Let's say you place SL below Fibo 0.786, namely 0.7 while the profit target is at 2.4, then your risk and reward ratio is 8 to 1.
$MANTA
#ETHETFsApproved #CryptoPCEWatch #MtGoxJulyRepayments
ترجمة
Potential bounce for ETH based on price action in Daily TFOn May 20, 2024 Ethereum rose very significantly by around 20%. This is related to the positive progress of the ETF's approval by the SEC, although it has not yet been approved to start trading. If we look at the price action in the Daily TF after the pump on May 20, it can be seen that ETH experienced a decline. But it's clear this wasn't an impulsive drop but more like a healthy correction. On May 24, ETH rebounded quite well at Fibo 0.618. This is a positive sign that this coin will start to continue its rise again. The supporting reason is the possibility that the SEC will approve Ethereum ETF trading on July 4 as reported by Reuter. The closest target is FVG which was formed on June 7 2024. If there is rejection here a lower high will be formed but if it is successful in breaking it then we can hope that ETH will test the price of 4000 dollars. $ETH {future}(ETHUSDT) #CryptoPCEWatch #MtGoxJulyRepayments #BTCFOMCWatch #EtheruemETF #ETHETFsApproved

Potential bounce for ETH based on price action in Daily TF

On May 20, 2024 Ethereum rose very significantly by around 20%. This is related to the positive progress of the ETF's approval by the SEC, although it has not yet been approved to start trading.
If we look at the price action in the Daily TF after the pump on May 20, it can be seen that ETH experienced a decline. But it's clear this wasn't an impulsive drop but more like a healthy correction.
On May 24, ETH rebounded quite well at Fibo 0.618. This is a positive sign that this coin will start to continue its rise again.
The supporting reason is the possibility that the SEC will approve Ethereum ETF trading on July 4 as reported by Reuter.
The closest target is FVG which was formed on June 7 2024. If there is rejection here a lower high will be formed but if it is successful in breaking it then we can hope that ETH will test the price of 4000 dollars.
$ETH
#CryptoPCEWatch #MtGoxJulyRepayments #BTCFOMCWatch #EtheruemETF #ETHETFsApproved
ترجمة
{future}(BTCUSDT) $BTC BTC is retesting the trendline that was broken some time ago which is also the Fibo retracement 0.618 (golden ratio). If there is rejection here it is very likely that the price will return to 60k even lower and make a new lower low. but if we can take over the last high, namely at 64500, then we can hope for a reversal. #CryptoPCEWatch #MtGoxJulyRepayments #BTCFOMCWatch

$BTC BTC is retesting the trendline that was broken some time ago which is also the Fibo retracement 0.618 (golden ratio).
If there is rejection here it is very likely that the price will return to 60k even lower and make a new lower low.
but if we can take over the last high, namely at 64500, then we can hope for a reversal.

#CryptoPCEWatch
#MtGoxJulyRepayments
#BTCFOMCWatch
ترجمة
if we lose because of the market situation then that is acceptable. but if we lose because of the actions of other parties then that is unacceptable. especially if this merger process benefits them. It is appropriate for them to be obliged to compensate for all losses incurred #DelistingNotice
if we lose because of the market situation then that is acceptable. but if we lose because of the actions of other parties then that is unacceptable. especially if this merger process benefits them.
It is appropriate for them to be obliged to compensate for all losses incurred

#DelistingNotice
LIVE
conquerer
--
Why should I close my $FET $OCEAN $AGIX future trade at loss for the sake of ASI Merger ? #Binance doesn't have that much expertise that will manage future trade conversion as well or they are forcefully closing our future trade for their exchange profit . Is it legal that exchange is for forcefully closing their user's future trade at loss ? I was expecting to get recover after ASI Merger but now it'll not 😭
استكشف أحدث أخبار العملات الرقمية
⚡️ كُن جزءًا من أحدث النقاشات في مجال العملات الرقمية
💬 تفاعل مع مُنشِئي المُحتوى المُفضّلين لديك
👍 استمتع بالمحتوى الذي يثير اهتمامك
البريد الإلكتروني / رقم الهاتف

آخر الأخبار

--
عرض المزيد

المقالات الرائجة

عرض المزيد
خريطة الموقع
Cookie Preferences
شروط وأحكام المنصّة