Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
Abbas Trader
--1.1k views
Ethereum ETF approved, so why aren’t we rich yet? Crypto commentators suggest there could be two reasons why the price of ETH hasn’t rocketed in the wake of spot Ether ETF approvals. There could be two main reasons why the price of Ether has barely moved despite the landmark approval of spot Ether exchange-traded funds (ETF) in the United States. On May 23, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved eight spot Ether ETFs to be listed on their respective exchanges. Ether ETH tickers down $ETH fell 3.4% just before the news, recovering by around 5% shortly after. ETH is trading at $3,806 at the time of writing. Crypto commentator Zach Rynes argues that the lack of movement reflects the notion that “everyone who wanted to buy the approval already did.” Ether had already surged 29% over the past week after reports suggested the SEC may have pivoted its stance toward ETF approvals. Rynes and many others also note that while the ETFs have been approved, they still haven’t been cleared to launch. That will require an approved S-1 filing, which is a comprehensive document including details on the firm’s financials and risk profile, as well as the securities they intend to offer. VanEck has just sent its amended S-1 filing to the SEC, and analysts have been saying it could take weeks to months for the S-1 approvals.

Ethereum ETF approved, so why aren’t we rich yet?

Crypto commentators suggest there could be two reasons why the price of ETH hasn’t rocketed in the wake of spot Ether ETF approvals.

There could be two main reasons why the price of Ether has barely moved despite the landmark approval of spot Ether exchange-traded funds (ETF) in the United States.

On May 23, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved eight spot Ether ETFs to be listed on their respective exchanges. Ether

ETH

tickers down

$ETH

fell 3.4% just before the news, recovering by around 5% shortly after. ETH is trading at $3,806 at the time of writing.

Crypto commentator Zach Rynes argues that the lack of movement reflects the notion that “everyone who wanted to buy the approval already did.”

Ether had already surged 29% over the past week after reports suggested the SEC may have pivoted its stance toward ETF approvals.

Rynes and many others also note that while the ETFs have been approved, they still haven’t been cleared to launch. That will require an approved S-1 filing, which is a comprehensive document including details on the firm’s financials and risk profile, as well as the securities they intend to offer.

VanEck has just sent its amended S-1 filing to the SEC, and analysts have been saying it could take weeks to months for the S-1 approvals.

إخلاء المسؤولية: تتضمن آراء أطراف خارجية. ليست نصيحةً مالية. يُمكن أن تحتوي على مُحتوى مُمول. اطلع على الشروط والأحكام.
0
استكشف أحدث أخبار العملات الرقمية
⚡️ كُن جزءًا من أحدث النقاشات في مجال العملات الرقمية
💬 تفاعل مع مُنشِئي المُحتوى المُفضّلين لديك
👍 استمتع بالمحتوى الذي يثير اهتمامك
البريد الإلكتروني / رقم الهاتف
مُنشِئ مُحتوى ذو صلة
LIVE
@AbbasT-rader

استكشف المزيد من مُنشِئ المُحتوى

--
$ETH Polymarket gets backlash over ‘approved’ outcome on $13M Ethereum ETF bet A multi-million bet on “Ethereum ETF approved by May 31” resolved to a “Yes” on Polymarket as news from the SEC broke, but the losing side argues it's not over yet. Polymarket users who lost money by betting against the approval of spot Ether ETH tickers down $3,701 exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are crying foul toward the decentralized betting platform, arguing the bet is still on. One betting market on the blockchain platform saw over $13.2 million worth of bets placed on whether an Ether ETF would be approved by May 31 — but it didn’t exactly detail what “approved” meant. The market closed at a “Yes” result on May 23, after the Securities and Exchange Commission greenlit the 19b-4 filings for multiple Ether ETFs. Polymarket's logs show the result was briefly disputed but ultimately resolved with the same “Yes" outcome. But “No” voters argue the call is incorrect, saying a United States ETF needs an approved 19b-4 filing and Form S-1 to start trading on an exchange, and without the S-1 filing, there can’t be a “Yes” result. Analysts say it could be months before the SEC approves the S-1s, which some “No” voters may have banked their money on. Prominent “No” bidder “JustKen” — who changed their name to “RevengeTour19B4” after the saga — pointed to VanEck digital assets research head Matthew Sigel’s X post that said “ETFs are not considered ‘approved’” until both the S-1 and “19b-4 filing have been signed off on by the SEC. #TrendingBinance #ETHETFsApproved #EthereumETFApprovalExpectations #BTC
--
خريطة الموقع
Cookie Preferences
شروط وأحكام المنصّة