$RENDER 在 $6.822 再放一個限價買單，我預期整體市場會有 10-15% 的修正。可能會超過這個，但這是 | 幣安廣場上的 SilverWolfBtc

書籤與點讚

創作者中心

--

看漲

$RENDER 
在 $6.822 再放一個限價買單，我預期整體市場會有 10-15% 的修正。可能會超過這個，但這是我預期的最低限度。
#NFA✅  #Dyor2024   

0 人給了創作者打賞。

免責聲明：包含來自第三方的見解。非財務建議。可能包含贊助內容。請參閱條款。

211

0

探索最新的加密貨幣新聞

⚡️ 參與加密貨幣領域的最新討論

💬 與您喜愛的創作者互動

👍 享受您感興趣的內容

電子郵件 / 電話號碼

相關創作者

@SilverWolfBtc

創作者的更多內容

$BNB Looks good here

--

Breaking: Gold creates history by crossing $3400 first time ever. $BTC will follow soon. #gold #BTC走势分析

--

In trading, losses are inevitable — but they can be managed. Win big, lose small. How? By thrashing your ego. If you lose a trade, you lose a trade. Accept it. Admit you were wrong and cut the position. Don’t blame the market. “The setup was perfect, but market manipulation happened or some news killed it” — doesn’t matter. You were on the wrong side. Own it and move on. If you're winning a trade, have the confidence to add more. Why? Because you chose the right side — trust your work and shows confidence in yourself.   In short: cut losers, add to winners. Both need skills.

--

$SUI Price is at a crucial support zone and is currently trying to hold the 0.000025 level. This is a major level — if price loses this, then it could drop hard from here. Although if you compare it with other pairs against BTC, SUI is comparatively stronger. There is no clear sign of reversal yet, as price hasn't stabilized above the support level. The chart needs patience so that price can give a clear signal. The only thing you can do now is watch closely. Once SUI/BTC shows a proper reclaim, it could be a sign of reversal. By "proper reclaim," I mean retests by price, not just quick wicks.  Disclaimer: This is just an educational post not a financial advice. Please do your own research before posting anything. #SUI🔥

--

Binance vs. HyperLiquid: The JellyJelly Conflict Do you know about this? I'll explain the incident that happened this week: A whale, reportedly connected to Binance, opened a 6 million USDT short on a low-cap token called JellyJelly. Then, they pumped the price themselves, causing their own position to be force-liquidated. This left HyperLiquid stuck with a “toxic” short, losing over 10 million USDT and facing the risk of collapse. Another twist in the story is that Binance later listed JellyJelly. Was this a coordinated attack to crush a rising DeFi star? Unlike previous instances when centralized exchanges helped platforms recover from hacks, this time their response was silence. HyperLiquid responded by delisting JellyJelly and closing all positions, trying to end the crisis, but the damage was done. I have one question for all of you, by the way. I know the answer, but I would like to see if you also understand this. So, the question is: If the whale got liquidated and lost the trade, then HyperLiquid lost more than 10 million on this trade—shouldn’t the protocol profit from the forced liquidation? Please write in comments.

--

實時新聞

BTC 突破 109,000 USDT，24 小时跌幅收窄至0.33%

--

美联储6月维持利率不变概率为97.8%

--

男子自首涉嫌绑架并折磨意大利加密投资者

--

Cantor Fitzgerald 完成首笔 Bitcoin 借贷交易，提供超 1 亿美元贷款

--

ETH 突破 2,700 USDT，24 小时涨幅6.45%

--

熱門文章

这波Alpha，币圈谁玩得过他？空投猛如虎，钱包统治95%市场！🚀💰 😤别傻等了，别人已经在Alpha里吃饱喝足

這個中國女人成爲了輪椅上的"雙面女梟雄"，策劃了史上規模最大的贓款轉移案之一。涉及6.1萬枚比特幣

爆炸真相：天天刷积分领空投，为什么你的分数永远回不来？很多人以为每天刷15分，15天后积分能恢复，其实这是一场误会。

看到幣圈滾倉大法有心臟狂跳的感覺

这段时间有好几个粉丝说我最近都不提供情绪价值了，每次都是发赚钱的单子截图，还他妈买上车去旅游了，这让他们看得难受，当初关

Crypto交易员朱一旦

Cookie 偏好設定

Cookie 偏好設定