首頁
通知
個人檔案
熱門文章
新聞
書籤與點讚
創作者中心
設定
查看原文
LIVE
TumeloPat_Crypto
--
關注
願節日期間爲幣安帶來無縫交易的禮物、技術進步的喜悅以及蓬勃發展的加密社區的溫暖。迎接充滿看漲趨勢的聖誕節和充滿區塊鏈輝煌的新年!
#BinanceWish
$BNB
哈西布_達杜
加密語者
LIVE
Binance Announcement
--
與幣安一起解鎖聖誕節的魔力:150,000 美元贈品!
這是一般性公告。此處提到的產品和服務可能在您所在的地區不可用。
活動時間:2023-12-12 13:00 (UTC) 至 2023-12-22 13:00 (UTC)
這個節日期間,幣安將通過贈送價值 150,000 美元的 BNB 代幣代金券來滿足您的聖誕願望,傳播歡樂!
如何參與
關注我們並在我們的任何社交平臺上發佈您的聖誕祝福。
X(推特)
轉發:轉發我們的贈品帖子來傳播節日氣氛。
關注@Binance:及時瞭解更多激動人心的更新。
免責聲明:包含來自第三方的見解。非財務建議。可能包含贊助內容。
請參閱條款。
BNB
491
+2.33%
19
0
回覆
0
探索最新的加密貨幣新聞
⚡️ 參與加密貨幣領域的最新討論
💬 與您喜愛的創作者互動
👍 享受您感興趣的內容
電子郵件 / 電話號碼
註冊
登入
相關創作者
LIVE
TumeloPat_Crypto
@TumeloPat
關注
創作者的更多內容
6. Incentive By convention, the first transaction in a block is a special transaction that starts a new coin owned by the creator of the block. This adds an incentive for nodes to support the network, and provides a way to initially distribute coins into circulation, since there is no central authority to issue them. The steady addition of a constant of amount of new coins is analogous to gold miners expending resources to add gold to circulation. In our case, it is CPU time and electricity that is expended. The incentive can also be funded with transaction fees. If the output value of a transaction is less than its input value, the difference is a transaction fee that is added to the incentive value of the block containing the transaction. Once a predetermined number of coins have entered circulation, the incentive can transition entirely to transaction fees and be completely inflation free. The incentive may help encourage nodes to stay honest. If a greedy attacker is able to assemble more CPU power than all the honest nodes, he would have to choose between using it to defraud people by stealing back his payments, or using it to generate new coins. He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules, such rules that favour him with more new coins than everyone else combined, than to undermine the system and the validity of his own wealth. #BinanceSquare #Binance #bnbburn #BitcoinWorld #bitcoin $BTC
--
5. Network The steps to run the network are as follows: New transactions are broadcast to all nodes. Each node collects new transactions into a block. Each node works on finding a difficult proof-of-work for its block. When a node finds a proof-of-work, it broadcasts the block to all nodes. Nodes accept the block only if all transactions in it are valid and not already spent. In that case, they work on the first one they received, but save the other branch in case it becomes longer. block as the previous hash. Nodes express their acceptance of the block by working on creating the next block in the chain, using the hash of the accepted block as the previous hash. Nodes always consider the longest chain to be the correct one and will keep working on extending it. If two nodes broadcast different versions of the next block simultaneously, some nodes may receive one or the other first. In that case, they work on the first one they received, but save the other branch in case it becomes longer. New transaction broadcasts do not necessarily need to reach all nodes. As long as they reach many nodes, they will get into a block before long. Block broadcasts are also tolerant of dropped messages. If a node does not receive a block, it will request it when it receives the next block and realizes it missed one. #bnbburn #BitcoinWorld #bitcoin #Binance #BinanceSquare
--
3. Timestamp Server The solution we propose begins with a timestamp server. A timestamp server works by taking a hash of a block of items to be timestamped and widely publishing the hash, such as in a newspaper or Usenet post [2-5]. The timestamp proves that the data must have existed at the time, obviously, in order to get into the hash. Each timestamp includes the previous timestamp in its hash, forming a chain, with each additional timestamp reinforcing the ones before it. #BinanceSquare #bitcoin #BitcoinWorld #BNB #trading
--
4. Proof-of-Work To implement a distributed timestamp server on a peer-to-peer basis, we will need to use a proof-of-work system similar to Adam Back’s Hashcash[6], rather than newspaper or Usenet posts. The proof-of-work involves scanning for a value that when hashed, such as with SHA-256, the hash begins with a number of zero bits. The average work required is exponential in the number of zero bits required and can be verified by executing a single hash. For our timestamp network, we implement the proof-of-work by incrementing a nonce in the block until a value is found that gives the block’s hash the required zero bits. Once the CPU effort has been expended to make it satisfy the proof-of-work, the block cannot be changed without redoing the work. As later blocks are chained after it, the work to change the block would include redoing all the blocks after it. The proof-of-work also solves the problem of determining representation in majority decision making. If the majority were based on one-IP-address-one-vote, it could be subverted by anyone able to allocate many IPs. Proof-of-work is essentially one-CPU-one-vote. The majority decision is represented by the longest chain, which has the greatest proof-of-work effort invested in it. If a majority of CPU power is controlled by honest nodes, the honest chain will grow the fastest and outpace any competing chains To modify a past block, an attacker would have to redo the proof-of-work of the block and all blocks after it and then catch up with and surpass the work of the honest nodes. We will show later that the probability of a slower attacker catching up diminishes exponentially as subsequent blocks are added. To compensate for increasing hardware speed and varying interest in running nodes over time, the proof-of-work difficulty is determined by a moving average targeting an average number of blocks per hour. If they’re generated too fast, the difficulty increases. #BinanceSquare #BTC #BitcoinWorld #uniswap #ftx
--
2. Transactions We define an electronic coin as a chain of digital signatures. Each owner transfers the coin to the next by digitally signing a hash of the previous transaction and the public key of the next owner and adding these to the end of the coin. A payee can verify the signatures to verify the chain of ownership. The problem of course is the payee can’t verify that one of the owners did not double-spend the coin. A common solution is to introduce a trusted central authority, or mint, that checks every transaction for double spending. After each transaction, the coin must be returned to the mint to issue a new coin, and only coins issued directly from the mint are trusted not to be double-spent. The problem with this solution is that the fate of the entire money system depends on the company running the mint, with every transaction having to go through them, just like a bank. We need a way for the payee to know that the previous owners did not sign any earlier transactions. For our purposes, the earliest transaction is the one that counts, so we don't care about later attempts to double-spend. The only way to confirm the absence of a transaction is to be aware of all transactions. In the mint based model, the mint was aware of all transactions and decided which arrived first. To accomplish this without a trusted party, transactions must be publicly announced[1], and we need a system for participants to agree on a single history of the order in which they were received. The payee needs proof that at the time of each transaction, the majority of nodes agreed it was the first received. #BinanceSquare #BitcoinWorld #Binance #bitcoin #usdr
--
實時新聞
SOL/ETH 比率创历史新高,因市场动荡引发抛售潮
--
Hyperliquid 24小时永续合约交易量达43亿美元创历史新高
--
Lnfi Network 推迟产品发布以应对市场下滑
--
Aigisos 分配 9000 万枚 AIG 给 Genesis Rolldrop
--
Conflux 完成 v2.4.0 硬分叉升级并激活 CIP-1559
--
查看更多
熱門文章
解析85暴跌數據:哪些幣反彈最迅猛?哪些板塊最弱勢?
Odaily星球日报
Aave協議在加密貨市場代迷中逆勢盈利數百萬
奔跑财经-FinaceRun
日经大涨8%,日元跌逾1%,恐慌性抛售结束?
金十数据APP
行情分析。市場大暴跌,大餅以太熔斷?24小時爆倉10億美金,美國經濟走向衰退?
朱老师区块链3000问
屠殺!比特幣插針49000「創半年最大跌幅」
鸿铭论
查看更多
網站地圖
Cookie Preferences
平台條款