DAOs and Centralized Organizations Must Work in Tandem | Opinion

CryptoNews · 2024-08-12T12:23:06.000Z

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial. Since David Chaum’s 1982 dissertation introduced decentralized blockchains, the goal has been to create systems free from central authority corruption. Decentralized autonomous organizations are now emerging as alternatives to traditional entities like LLCs or non-profits. You might also like: The ownership of everything: Сentralization vs. decentralization | Opinion However, what if there were a way for DAOs to work in tandem with centralized organizations while still maintaining their fundamental purpose—to operate as self-governing, decentralized entities managed by the collective decisions of their members? The Wyoming DAO law In 2021, the state of Wyoming enacted the “Decentralized Autonomous Organization Supplement.” This law allows DAOs to be officially recognized as LLCs, enabling them to enter into legal contracts and own property without the need for off-chain shell corporations. This new status provides DAOs with opportunities to raise funds through both token sales and traditional funding avenues. Additionally, DAOs can leverage R&D facilities, employ staff, and utilize RegTech, all while preserving their decentralized, transparent, and democratic decision-making processes. This legal recognition opens up new avenues for DAOs to collaborate effectively with centralized organizations, combining the strengths of both models to foster innovation and growth. The benefits of collaboration explored Initially, blockchain projects were launched in a monolithic fashion, with everything bundled into a single stack. However, as the technology has matured, specialization and optimization at each layer became crucial for scalability and efficiency. Centralized organizations possess substantial resources, structured processes, and access to traditional funding avenues. These advantages can significantly aid DAOs in scaling their operations and facilitating legal agreements. Moreover, one of the most compelling benefits of such collaborations lies in enhancing governance and decision-making processes. DAOs excel in decentralized governance, enabling members to directly influence a project’s direction, thereby reflecting a broader stakeholder base. By integrating diverse voting mechanisms, such as Quadratic Voting, furthers fairer representation. The opportunities are far from complete To further grow this collaboration, we can leverage one of the major perks of DAOs and blockchain technology: transparency. By combining DAOs with decentralized finance, we can create systems where every transaction is permanently recorded and linked to a community vote. This ensures that all spending within an organization is fully transparent and accountable to its members. This transparency can significantly change how traditional organizations track spending. It prevents fraud from going unnoticed and ensures everyone can see how and where the money is being used. For non-profits, this level of transparency is especially influential. Members and donors can see exactly where their money is going and how much is being spent, which can prevent situations like the Arts Center Scheme, where over $1.1 million was embezzled by a low-level accounts receivable employee. Another major benefit is the use of smart contracts to automate processes. Smart contracts can streamline operations by executing predefined actions when certain conditions are met. This reduces administrative overhead and human error, making things more efficient. Plus, it ensures that everything is done transparently and according to agreed-upon rules, which strengthens trust and accountability in both centralized and decentralized environments. The potential shortcomings Anything that looks too good to be true is probably not true. Combining DAOs and centralized organizations presents many challenges and issues, but there are ways to prevent and mitigate many of these problems. A primary concern with DAOs is the cost of voting. Since votes must be done onchain for the smart contract to execute, the transaction costs can quickly add up, especially with numerous proposals. One proposed solution is voting off-chain. However, off-chain voting introduces the risk of manipulation and centralization. An alternative approach involves using zk-rollups, which execute transactions on a zk-rollup L2 chain. This method batches transactions and sends them to the L1 chain, drastically reducing fees and increasing efficiency. Another major concern is that incorporating a centralized aspect into a decentralized system diminishes the value of a DAO and poses significant risks. While Wyoming’s DAO law does not require the main owners to verify their identities, operational and legal considerations, particularly when interacting with financial institutions or engaging in regulated activities, may necessitate individual verification. The means for the future The collaboration between DAOs and centralized organizations opens up exciting possibilities for the future. This partnership could transform how we handle governance, transparency, and operational efficiency across various sectors. By combining the decentralized nature of DAOs with the resources and structured processes of centralized organizations, we get the best of both worlds. Looking ahead, we can expect more regions to develop legal frameworks similar to Wyoming’s DAO law. This will provide DAOs with the legal recognition they need to operate alongside traditional entities, paving the way for seamless collaboration and innovation. This hybrid model preserves the transparency and democracy of DAOs while bringing in the efficiency and resources of centralized organizations. This blending of decentralized and centralized approaches is set to redefine how organizations operate, making the future of governance and operations more democratic and effective. Read more: What does crypto’s growth mean for the future of DAOs? | Opinion Author: Neil Shah Neil Shah is a visionary entrepreneur passionate about artificial intelligence, web3, finance, and computer science. He founded InSight3D, a company at the forefront of technological innovation. Additionally, Neil is the co-founder and president of The Brave Heroes Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting pediatric cancer patients and their families. His journey into the world of web3 began with an early project where he built a paper trading platform for cryptocurrency. This initiative aimed to introduce more people to crypto, igniting Neil’s profound interest in web3 and DAOs. Through his work with InSight3D and The Brave Heroes Foundation, Neil continually strives to leverage technology to create meaningful societal impacts while exploring new frontiers in the digital landscape. His commitment to innovation and community service defines his approach to entrepreneurship.

聲明：本文所表達的觀點和意見只屬於作者，並不代表 crypto.news 社論的觀點和意見。
自從 David Chaum 1982 年的論文引入去中心化區塊鏈以來，我們的目標一直是創建沒有中央機構腐敗的系統。去中心化自治組織現在正在成爲有限責任公司或非營利組織等傳統實體的替代品。
您可能也喜歡：一切的所有權：集中化與分散化|觀點
然而，如果有一種方法可以讓 DAO 與中心化組織協同工作，同時仍然保持其根本目的（作爲由其成員的集體決策管理的自治、去中心化實體運作），那會怎樣？
懷俄明州 DAO 法
2021 年，懷俄明州頒佈了《去中心化自治組織補充法》。該法律允許 DAO 被正式認定爲有限責任公司，從而使其能夠簽訂合法合同並擁有財產，而無需建立鏈下空殼公司。這一新身份爲 DAO 提供了通過代幣銷售和傳統融資渠道籌集資金的機會。
此外，DAO 可以利用研發設施、僱用員工和利用監管科技，同時保持其去中心化、透明和民主的決策流程。這種法律認可爲 DAO 與中心化組織有效合作開闢了新途徑，結合兩種模式的優勢來促進創新和增長。
探索合作的好處
最初，區塊鏈項目以整體式方式啓動，所有內容都捆綁在一個堆棧中。然而，隨着技術的成熟，每一層的專業化和優化對於可擴展性和效率至關重要。
中心化組織擁有大量資源、結構化流程和傳統融資渠道。這些優勢可以極大地幫助 DAO 擴大業務規模並促進法律協議的達成。
此外，此類合作最引人注目的好處之一在於增強治理和決策流程。DAO 在去中心化治理方面表現出色，使成員能夠直接影響項目的方向，從而反映更廣泛的利益相關者羣體。通過整合二次投票等多種投票機制，進一步實現更公平的代表性。
機遇遠未實現
爲了進一步發展這種合作，我們可以利用 DAO 和區塊鏈技術的主要優勢之一：透明度。通過將 DAO 與去中心化金融相結合，我們可以創建永久記錄每筆交易並與社區投票掛鉤的系統。這確保組織內的所有支出都完全透明並對其成員負責。
這種透明度可以顯著改變傳統組織追蹤支出的方式。它可以防止欺詐行爲被忽視，並確保每個人都能看到資金的使用方式和用途。對於非營利組織來說，這種透明度尤其具有影響力。會員和捐助者可以確切地看到他們的錢花在了哪裏以及花了多少錢，這可以防止像藝術中心計劃這樣的情況發生，該計劃中超過 110 萬美元被一名低級應收賬款員工挪用。
另一個主要好處是使用智能合約來實現流程自動化。智能合約可以通過在滿足某些條件時執行預定義的操作來簡化操作。這減少了管理開銷和人爲錯誤，提高了效率。此外，它確保一切都透明地按照商定的規則進行，從而加強了集中和分散環境中的信任和問責制。
潛在的缺點
任何看起來好得令人難以置信的事情可能都不是真的。將 DAO 與中心化組織結合起來會帶來許多挑戰和問題，但有一些方法可以預防和緩解其中的許多問題。
DAO 的主要問題是投票成本。由於投票必須在鏈上進行，智能合約才能執行，因此交易成本會迅速增加，尤其是在提案衆多的情況下。
一種建議的解決方案是鏈下投票。然而，鏈下投票會帶來操縱和集中化的風險。另一種方法是使用 zk-rollups，它在 zk-rollup L2 鏈上執行交易。這種方法將交易分批發送到 L1 鏈，從而大幅降低費用並提高效率。
另一個主要擔憂是，將中心化元素融入去中心化系統會降低 DAO 的價值，並帶來重大風險。雖然懷俄明州的 DAO 法律不要求主要所有者驗證其身份，但出於運營和法律方面的考慮，尤其是在與金融機構互動或從事受監管活動時，可能需要進行個人驗證。
未來的手段
DAO 與中心化組織之間的合作爲未來開闢了令人興奮的可能性。這種合作關係可以改變我們在各個領域處理治理、透明度和運營效率的方式。通過將 DAO 的去中心化性質與中心化組織的資源和結構化流程相結合，我們可以實現兩全其美。
展望未來，我們可以期待更多地區制定類似於懷俄明州 DAO 法的法律框架。這將爲 DAO 提供與傳統實體一起運營所需的法律認可，爲無縫協作和創新鋪平道路。
這種混合模式保留了 DAO 的透明度和民主性，同時引入了中心化組織的效率和資源。這種去中心化和中心化方法的融合將重新定義組織的運作方式，使未來的治理和運營更加民主和有效。
閱讀更多：加密貨幣的增長對 DAO 的未來意味着什麼？| 觀點
作者：Neil Shah
Neil Shah 是一位富有遠見的企業家，對人工智能、Web3、金融和計算機科學充滿熱情。他創立了 InSight3D，這是一家處於技術創新前沿的公司。此外，Neil 還是 The Brave Heroes Foundation 的聯合創始人兼總裁，這是一家致力於支持兒童癌症患者及其家人的非營利組織。他進入 Web3 世界的旅程始於一個早期項目，當時他爲加密貨幣構建了一個紙質交易平臺。該計劃旨在讓更多人瞭解加密貨幣，激發了 Neil 對 Web3 和 DAO 的濃厚興趣。通過與 InSight3D 和 The Brave Heroes Foundation 的合作，Neil 不斷努力利用技術創造有意義的社會影響，同時探索數字領域的新前沿。他對創新和社區服務的承諾定義了他的創業方式。

創作者的更多內容

實時新聞

創作者的更多內容

實時新聞

熱門文章