首页
通知
个人主页
热门文章
新闻
收藏与点赞
创作者中心
设置
查看原文
LIVE
TumeloPat_Crypto
--
关注
愿节日期间为币安带来无缝交易的礼物、技术进步的喜悦以及蓬勃发展的加密社区的温暖。迎接充满看涨趋势的圣诞节和充满区块链辉煌的新年!
#BinanceWish
$BNB
哈西布_达杜
加密语者
LIVE
Binance Announcement
--
与币安一起解锁圣诞节的魔力:150,000 美元赠品!
这是一般性公告。此处提到的产品和服务可能在您所在的地区不可用。
活动时间:2023-12-12 13:00 (UTC) 至 2023-12-22 13:00 (UTC)
这个节日期间,币安将通过赠送价值 150,000 美元的 BNB 代币代金券来满足您的圣诞愿望,传播欢乐!
如何参与
关注我们并在我们的任何社交平台上发布您的圣诞祝福。
X(推特)
转发:转发我们的赠品帖子来传播节日气氛。
关注@Binance:及时了解更多激动人心的更新。
免责声明:含第三方内容,不构成财务建议,并且可能包含赞助内容。
详见《条款和条件》。
BNB
558.5
+0.28%
19
0
回复
0
浏览最新的加密货币新闻
⚡️ 参与加密货币领域的最新讨论
💬 与喜爱的创作者互动
👍 查看感兴趣的内容
邮箱/手机号码
注册
登录
相关创作者
LIVE
TumeloPat_Crypto
@TumeloPat
关注
创作者的更多内容
6. Incentive By convention, the first transaction in a block is a special transaction that starts a new coin owned by the creator of the block. This adds an incentive for nodes to support the network, and provides a way to initially distribute coins into circulation, since there is no central authority to issue them. The steady addition of a constant of amount of new coins is analogous to gold miners expending resources to add gold to circulation. In our case, it is CPU time and electricity that is expended. The incentive can also be funded with transaction fees. If the output value of a transaction is less than its input value, the difference is a transaction fee that is added to the incentive value of the block containing the transaction. Once a predetermined number of coins have entered circulation, the incentive can transition entirely to transaction fees and be completely inflation free. The incentive may help encourage nodes to stay honest. If a greedy attacker is able to assemble more CPU power than all the honest nodes, he would have to choose between using it to defraud people by stealing back his payments, or using it to generate new coins. He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules, such rules that favour him with more new coins than everyone else combined, than to undermine the system and the validity of his own wealth. #BinanceSquare #Binance #bnbburn #BitcoinWorld #bitcoin $BTC
--
5. Network The steps to run the network are as follows: New transactions are broadcast to all nodes. Each node collects new transactions into a block. Each node works on finding a difficult proof-of-work for its block. When a node finds a proof-of-work, it broadcasts the block to all nodes. Nodes accept the block only if all transactions in it are valid and not already spent. In that case, they work on the first one they received, but save the other branch in case it becomes longer. block as the previous hash. Nodes express their acceptance of the block by working on creating the next block in the chain, using the hash of the accepted block as the previous hash. Nodes always consider the longest chain to be the correct one and will keep working on extending it. If two nodes broadcast different versions of the next block simultaneously, some nodes may receive one or the other first. In that case, they work on the first one they received, but save the other branch in case it becomes longer. New transaction broadcasts do not necessarily need to reach all nodes. As long as they reach many nodes, they will get into a block before long. Block broadcasts are also tolerant of dropped messages. If a node does not receive a block, it will request it when it receives the next block and realizes it missed one. #bnbburn #BitcoinWorld #bitcoin #Binance #BinanceSquare
--
3. Timestamp Server The solution we propose begins with a timestamp server. A timestamp server works by taking a hash of a block of items to be timestamped and widely publishing the hash, such as in a newspaper or Usenet post [2-5]. The timestamp proves that the data must have existed at the time, obviously, in order to get into the hash. Each timestamp includes the previous timestamp in its hash, forming a chain, with each additional timestamp reinforcing the ones before it. #BinanceSquare #bitcoin #BitcoinWorld #BNB #trading
--
4. Proof-of-Work To implement a distributed timestamp server on a peer-to-peer basis, we will need to use a proof-of-work system similar to Adam Back’s Hashcash[6], rather than newspaper or Usenet posts. The proof-of-work involves scanning for a value that when hashed, such as with SHA-256, the hash begins with a number of zero bits. The average work required is exponential in the number of zero bits required and can be verified by executing a single hash. For our timestamp network, we implement the proof-of-work by incrementing a nonce in the block until a value is found that gives the block’s hash the required zero bits. Once the CPU effort has been expended to make it satisfy the proof-of-work, the block cannot be changed without redoing the work. As later blocks are chained after it, the work to change the block would include redoing all the blocks after it. The proof-of-work also solves the problem of determining representation in majority decision making. If the majority were based on one-IP-address-one-vote, it could be subverted by anyone able to allocate many IPs. Proof-of-work is essentially one-CPU-one-vote. The majority decision is represented by the longest chain, which has the greatest proof-of-work effort invested in it. If a majority of CPU power is controlled by honest nodes, the honest chain will grow the fastest and outpace any competing chains To modify a past block, an attacker would have to redo the proof-of-work of the block and all blocks after it and then catch up with and surpass the work of the honest nodes. We will show later that the probability of a slower attacker catching up diminishes exponentially as subsequent blocks are added. To compensate for increasing hardware speed and varying interest in running nodes over time, the proof-of-work difficulty is determined by a moving average targeting an average number of blocks per hour. If they’re generated too fast, the difficulty increases. #BinanceSquare #BTC #BitcoinWorld #uniswap #ftx
--
2. Transactions We define an electronic coin as a chain of digital signatures. Each owner transfers the coin to the next by digitally signing a hash of the previous transaction and the public key of the next owner and adding these to the end of the coin. A payee can verify the signatures to verify the chain of ownership. The problem of course is the payee can’t verify that one of the owners did not double-spend the coin. A common solution is to introduce a trusted central authority, or mint, that checks every transaction for double spending. After each transaction, the coin must be returned to the mint to issue a new coin, and only coins issued directly from the mint are trusted not to be double-spent. The problem with this solution is that the fate of the entire money system depends on the company running the mint, with every transaction having to go through them, just like a bank. We need a way for the payee to know that the previous owners did not sign any earlier transactions. For our purposes, the earliest transaction is the one that counts, so we don't care about later attempts to double-spend. The only way to confirm the absence of a transaction is to be aware of all transactions. In the mint based model, the mint was aware of all transactions and decided which arrived first. To accomplish this without a trusted party, transactions must be publicly announced[1], and we need a system for participants to agree on a single history of the order in which they were received. The payee needs proof that at the time of each transaction, the majority of nodes agreed it was the first received. #BinanceSquare #BitcoinWorld #Binance #bitcoin #usdr
--
实时新闻
机构分析:美联储基准利率比合理水平高约1.7个百分点
--
Genesis 完成重组并开始向债权人分配款项
--
Tensor 基金会宣布重大更改以迁移至开源 Tensor 协议
--
特朗普媒体集团将推出流媒体电视平台 Truth+
--
Three Arrows Capital 清算人起诉 Zhu 和 Davies
--
查看更多
热门文章
无惧亏损,MicroStrategy 二季度斥资 8.05 亿美元增持比特币
奔跑财经-FinaceRun
11张图解读七月加密市场:久违的反弹终于来了
PANews
美联储或将于9月降息
币世界中本聪 Satoshi Nakamoto
2019年的降息背景和2024年的降息背景有何异同
链研社lianyanshe
网友狂赞!Solana 新影片吐槽「加密大会」:参加者都是为了拿空投、免费周边
加密城市 Crypto City
查看更多
网站地图
Cookie Preferences
平台条款和条件