●Historical Review: #BTC
First, let's look at the previous text to understand that everyone is currently focused on short-selling. After the previously mentioned 9 PM, the follow-up was postponed until after 4 AM.
At 2 AM, news of old matters being revisited caused a dip, as it seemed that the short-sellers after 4 AM were trying to assess the situation of the bulls in order to manage risk.
Later, after 4 AM, we also saw the short-sellers dip again, with ETH being more severely affected. However, the short-sellers felt that the risks associated with going long were greater, so they did not aggressively suppress the market.
All these historical reviews were mentioned in the previous text; it's just that before the future articles, one must adjust their logic to align with the main players in order to see what is to come. Please compare the previous text with the market. Do not pay attention to what anyone else says. For instance, some people may translate articles themselves rather than conveying the main players' approach, saying: isn't it supposed to be short-selling? How come there's such a big rise? If one hasn't looked at the price, they might think it has already reached 100k, only to realize upon checking that the price is even lower than before. The result is that one gets misled by others' words regarding the current situation.
●Future (Follow-up):
In the follow-up, under the condition of the long-selling situation mentioned on the 26th, we know that the long-sellers began observing the market after 12 PM. While it is known that she is related to the hype around Trump’s messages, there doesn't seem to be any significant breakout at the moment.
Currently, there’s nothing much to say, just waiting until the long-sellers arrive... Due to the temporary halt of the fake group, the latter half will not be published. The Binance square will prioritize posting; please verify the posting time. If you need the latter half, please search for my name and subscribe.