A series of events related to the friendly OKX exchange has attracted widespread attention.
It seems that the OK exchange is currently facing a serious layoff problem, which undoubtedly exacerbates the market's concerns about its stability. However, unlike the common problem of exchanges freezing user funds in the past, this incident is more bizarre and eye-catching - user funds were actually stolen from the top exchanges, and such incidents seem to have a trend of continuous occurrence. This undoubtedly makes many users begin to examine the security of their assets in the exchange.
The OK exchange has recently frequently carried out fund concentration operations, and thus consumed a large amount of mining fees. Whether there is a connection between this move and the subsequent theft of funds from large users is thought-provoking.
The stolen users are mainly concentrated in China, and the main victims are large users at the V3 to V5 level, whose assets disappeared overnight. Furthermore, these thefts all occurred in the early hours of the morning, and the thieves seem to be able to accurately locate and select users with more funds for theft, and the main method is to convert USDT into Ethereum and then withdraw it. Finally, it is said that the largest amount of stolen funds is as high as 35 million.
The OK exchange did not give a clear solution and response in time, which aroused market doubts about its response capabilities. Although some people have tried to blame the problem on the security of users' personal devices, this explanation is obviously untenable when many similar incidents occur frequently and the victims are all large investors.
If OK Exchange cannot give users a satisfactory explanation, its position as the second largest Chinese exchange may collapse in an instant. It is reported that large users have begun to withdraw funds to avoid risks. It is expected that OK Exchange may compensate for part of the losses in order to maintain its reputation, but the specific results still need further observation.
Faced with this series of events, we can't help but ask: What exactly happened? Is it an internal problem of the exchange, or an external hacker attack? In either case, it reminds us to re-examine and strengthen our personal risk prevention awareness in the field of digital assets.
I need fans, you need references. It's better to pay attention than to guess.