Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
Sober聊期权
--1.8k views
Used Range Bound to short BTC's Vol last week, earn 🛑APR 480%.🚀🚀🚀 The research and investment of some option structured products will be updated in the future. #BTC #options #RangeBound

Used Range Bound to short BTC's Vol last week, earn

🛑APR 480%.🚀🚀🚀

The research and investment of some option structured products will be updated in the future. #BTC #options #RangeBound

LIVE
Sober聊期权
--
Talk about Binance’s options products Range Bound
Binance recently launched a product called Range Bound among its wealth management products, the link is as follows

 https://www.binance.com/en/rangebound(English)

Product Entry

Product Revenue

Range Bound, this product means that the investors choose a date + an interval for wealth management. If the price does not jump out of range, the investors will get the corresponding income (the APR in the above picture is the annualized return). But once the price touch up or down point at any time, the product will be stopped immediately, and the investors' account will have a certain small losses (generally around 1-3%, depending on the length of time and the price width)

It supports both methods of stable coin and underlying coin (that is, the USD basis and crypto basis mentioned by options investors, the USD basis requires a longer expiration time, mainly based on liquidity consideration)

Compared with traditional wealth management and options, Range Bound has the following advantages:

1 (Key point) With the traditional options structure, the risk of the seller is unlimited. Especially for rookie options sellers, it is easy to oversell while shorting the volatility and lead to liquidation when encountering extreme market conditions. However, Range Bound makes the unlimited risk of the seller convert into limited risk of the buyer.

2 Compared with the Dual Investment, the Range Bound users will not cause short term losses due to selling the underlying asset too early. For example, during an extreme unilateral market condition, the price suddenly rises by 50% in half a month. The Dual Investment would convert investors’ coins into USD, causing the investors to miss large potential gains. On the other hand, the loss of the Range Bound investors is very limited, and it will not change whether the investors are a currency standard or a USD standard.

3 The Range Bound supports stable coins and BTC ETH (users can directly choose U standard or currency based options to short volatility), and investors will not change their overall position distribution when buying the Range Bound, which is safer than the Dual Investment. To avoid being forced to switch between USD and coin in a unilateral market, selling or buying too early. Compared with the Dual Investment, the Range Bound can take on more user positions.

4 The Range Bound belongs to high level wealth management in the traditional financial market, and the design of similar barrier options such as snowballs in the traditional market is relatively complicated. The Range Bound is designed based on DNT and support stable coins and underlying currencies, which is more flexible and convenient. Short, medium and long cycles can be selected according to the needs of the investors.

5 The income of the Range Bound is higher than the Dual Investment. As shown in the figures, as long as BTC price does not exceed 31,500, the annualized return of the Range Bound would be 30% higher than Dual Investment (of course, we should take the losing risk of Range Bound into consideration)

Dual Investment

Range Bound

6 The Range Bound can make investors pay more attention to the amplitude and fluctuation, rather than only the price. It can better break away from the idea of ​​​​guessing the market rising or falling, improving investors' trading thinking.

To be fair, Range Bound is not a perfect product, and has the following shortcomings

1 For the investors, it is necessary to make a certain judgment on the market (because if the judgment is wrong, there will be a risk of a slight retracement of the principal ranging from 0.5% to 2%. Unlike the Dual Investment, One can comfort oneself by reducing or increasing underlying asset). The Range Bound is close to the R3 level products of the stock market, that is, there are small fluctuations, no large retracement, and no explosive growth in earnings. After all, there are always several big market touches the up or down point every year.

2 The income of the Range Bound has a greater relationship with market fluctuations, so when buying in a bear market, it will also suffer losses when it encounters a sharp drop.

3 At present, the Range Bound has not developed the options of ultra-long term and ultra-wide, and I believe it will be improved in the future.

Finally, let's take a look at the underlying design of the Range Bound



The Range Bound is essentially a kind of exotic option, but it is a relatively simple type. It is mainly generated based on the optimization of DNT options. Let's briefly introduce DNT options



DNT stands for "Double No Touch" In DNT options, investors need to set two barrier prices, an upper barrier and a lower barrier. If the price of the underlying asset has not touched the price range between these two barriers when the options expires, the option will be automatically exercised when the option expires, and investors will obtain fixed income; if the price of the underlying asset has touched If the price range between these two barriers is exceeded, the option will be invalidated automatically, and the investor will lose the premium paid when buying the option. (The amount of loss that the Range Bound was touched)

 

DNT is a relatively well understood exotic option, because the strategy looks like a short volatility investor + stop loss operation (while the crypto investment market lacks suitable short volatility products) double sell when the price breaks through When the price is close, the loss caused by the immediate stop loss (actually manifested as the loss of premium), but this series of operations is packaged into a buyer's product, and the loss is locked in, so as not to bear greater risks. Of course, as for the underlying design of this option, it is more complicated, we will not introduce it in detail, and the requirements for the designer's strategy + execution ability are relatively high. Because if the underlying optimization is unfavorable, the cost of the option will be too high (the user loss is too large after the touch, and the interval treasure is locked at around 2%. I believe that investors who have been options sellers know that this ratio is quite stable), Therefore, it is best to avoid small CEX for such products, otherwise, in extreme market conditions, the CEX may have the risk of Rug pull.

Article was written by Sober(❤️Follow me, focus on #Options )
Ansvarsfriskrivning: Inkluderar åsikter från tredje part. Ingen ekonomisk rådgivning. Se användarvillkor.
0
Relevant kreatör
LIVE
@TAS20200606

Utforska mer från Creator

高大上的加密期权DDH,对散户有什么指导意义? 后面会延续之前2周思路,周末写一些深度期权文章 期权学到一定阶段,中手水平附近,总会听到很多玩家讨论DDH,搞一个中性的策略,还能稳定赚钱,就问是不是除了期权这个工具,其他都不太行? 其他很多所谓“套利”,其实都有这极大的本金损失风险的,就像加密市场跨所资金费率套利 一、中性双卖特点: 我在23年做了3个月左右中性双卖+DDH策略,当时也有过一段时间每天发X展示净值。 当时,我做中性双卖的特点是:只有在不确定行情的时候才会让组合保持中性。(因为当时不是牛中,如现在一般相对确定的行情)如果我对行情的判断把握是8成以上,我会让delta保持一定的偏离(比如现在我会持续+Delta),但是也不会偏差太多,这样做的好处是: 1对冲值(delta值)其实没有必要保持绝对中性,只要让它在可控范围内,我们的调整都是可以去解决它的。 2加以一定的行情判断,盈利自然是三个盈利来源都占全,如果出现失误,时间价值和降波的收益,也是可以对冲一部分的。 当然,我此番言论是建立在我个人交易体系上的(因为我添加了轻微的行情判断并有能力控制它风险),就是---我不会去频繁动态调整,因为双卖的调整是有弊端的,它表现在: 1加仓会加在盈利那腿,减仓减在亏损的那腿,它不像long gamma的策略是可以完成高抛低吸动作的,这是所有中性双卖交易员都面临的难题,当然,可以解决。 2没必要保持“绝对中性”,你只需要让它保持在你可控范围内问题都不太大的,比如10万美金资产做双卖,通常建仓的delta保持在正负20万的区间内,问题都不大。 所以,就我经历来说,“频繁调整”和“强中性逻辑”往往容易得不偿失,最简单的案例就是你加仓了盈利的那腿的时候,发现那腿方向逆行,同时还升波,这对于每个交易员的信心打击是非常大的。 秉承着一直的操作思路,开始“度”的调仓,因为在操作上,一直保持 10-21天卖Delta 20-35且不用过多调整(山寨标的) 20-10天卖平值并进行实时调整(BTC 和 ETH ) 10-0天收工并尝试套gamma的策略,对,我开始卖平值了,这就意味着,接下来的一阵子,调整会变多。 如下图是去年沪深300ETF做的卖方风控测评excel表格 是的,卖平值的盈亏会很明显,盈亏概率都相同,这是我们无法左右的事。 所以,建仓的目光我们可以大部分关注在IV上,因为从IV的角度上说,月中IV一般是降的,事件之初(etf、减半等等)或者月初多头空头建仓的博弈和月末可能出现的末日行情都导致IV可能会有较大波动。 所以这个时候,在客观环境比较平和的时候,IV的下降会比较明显。 最近一周其实都在慢慢降波,尤其是山寨期权标的,哪怕方向带来了一定的损失,但是波动率持续下降,让这个组合盈利特别明显 二、总结 1动态调整没有对与错,只有适合不适合,价内和价外是不用太多调整的,但平值是可能去调整的会出现得比较频繁,毕竟,DDH这个东西并非是什么场景都适用的。 2双买策略是DDH最标准的应用场景,因为它能做到高抛低吸,但是在双卖里,DDH就是反的,它呈现的是“低抛高吸”,这要求我们得想出自己的一套能解决它的办法。 3双卖里,卖实卖虚讲究不大,不信?它俩的到期收益是相同的,你可以算一算。它俩的即期收益差别也不大,(卖实值的亏损体现在一腿接近平值一腿更加实值,卖虚值的亏损体现在一腿接近平值,一腿更加虚值。两种方案几近相同。) 4中性双卖的核心在“体系”在“调整”,在严格遵守这套教稳定的盈利体系(也就是操作纪律)下,有一套完整的“调整”方法,那么3个月左右还要亏钱,也是有难度的,坦白讲,尤其在没有选错标的,且高波动率市场。 最后,有想要深入学习期权玩家,欢迎加入“Sober聊期权星球”
--

Senaste nytt

Visa mer
Webbplatskarta
Cookie Preferences
Plattformens villkor