portofolio

Before diving into the main focus of this article, I want to clarify a few things. If you're someone who gambles with cryptocurrency, I suggest you take a break and move on. If you're someone chasing quick profits, this article isn't for you—it's time to start thinking logically, because there are no shortcuts to lasting success. And if you're not someone who enjoys reading and learning, this might not be the right fit for you either. I’m saying all of this because this article is all about sharing what I've learned over the years—lessons that have helped me avoid some costly mistakes and make smarter, more thoughtful investment decisions. I’m not here to scam you or sell you a get-rich-quick scheme. I’ve made my share of mistakes, and the goal here is to pass on what I’ve learned so you don’t have to repeat them. This is about gaining real knowledge that can set you up for success in the long run. It would really help me if you like and share this article—not before, but after you’ve read it. It’s important to me that you understand the potential of the content first, and once you do, sharing it would truly mean a lot. Thank you for your support!

The purpose of this article is to help you start thinking about building your own investment portfolio—focusing on long-term stability, protecting yourself from high risks, and gradually growing your profits. As an experimental physicist with a PhD in material science, my work revolves around studying the properties of different materials with one goal: to understand them better and optimize them for various uses. To do this, I rely heavily on data, which I collect using specific tools. The same principle applies to investing—you need the right tools to gather the data that will help you figure out how to make smart decisions and use that information to your advantage.
Without further delay, let’s get into what I mean. The tools I’m referring to are five key risk-adjusted performance metrics in finance: the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin ratios. Each of these ratios offers unique insights into a portfolio’s performance, specifically how well it compensates investors for the risks they’re taking. When used together, they provide a well-rounded perspective on risk-adjusted returns, helping you make more informed and smarter investment decisions.
Sharpe Ratio
The Sharpe Ratio is one of the most widely used and recognized metrics in finance for assessing the performance of an investment portfolio. It helps investors understand how well their portfolio is performing in relation to the amount of risk it’s taking on. Essentially, it provides a measure of risk-adjusted return, allowing investors to compare different portfolios or strategies on a common ground—adjusted for the level of risk involved.
Developed by Nobel laureate William F. Sharpe in 1966, the Sharpe Ratio is particularly valuable because it takes into account both the return of the portfolio and the volatility of those returns, which reflect the level of risk. While higher returns can seem appealing, they can be misleading if they come with excessive risk. The Sharpe Ratio helps investors determine whether a portfolio’s excess returns are the result of skillful management or simply a byproduct of taking on more risk.
The formula for the Sharpe Ratio is

Where:

Rₚ - Return of the portfolio
Rf - Risk-free rate
σₚ - Standard deviation of portfolio excess returns

Portfolio Return (Rₚ)
This is the total return generated by the investment portfolio over a specific period, typically measured on an annualized basis. It includes both capital gains and income generated from the portfolio's assets.
Risk-Free Rate (Rf)
The risk-free rate represents the return on an almost risk-free investment, like a U.S. Treasury bond. It acts as a baseline because any portfolio should, at a minimum, outperform this rate to justify taking on additional risk. By subtracting the risk-free rate from the portfolio return, the Sharpe Ratio isolates the excess return, which is the portion of the return that compensates the investor for the risks they’re assuming.
Standard Deviation (σₚ)
Standard deviation is a statistical measure that shows how much the portfolio’s returns deviate from the average return. A higher standard deviation means the portfolio’s returns are more volatile, indicating greater risk. By including standard deviation, the Sharpe Ratio accounts for both the upside potential and downside risk, giving a more complete picture of the portfolio’s risk-adjusted performance.
Sortino Ratio
The Sortino Ratio is an important metric used to assess a portfolio’s risk-adjusted performance. It addresses a limitation of the widely-used Sharpe Ratio by specifically focusing on downside risk rather than overall volatility. This focus on negative fluctuations makes the Sortino Ratio especially valuable for investors who are more concerned about the risk of losing money than the total volatility, which includes both upward and downward price movements. As a result, the Sortino Ratio provides a more accurate, investor-focused measure of performance when evaluating risk.
The Sortino Ratio differentiates between harmful volatility (downside risk or negative returns) and total volatility, which includes both positive and negative price movements. Unlike the Sharpe Ratio— which penalizes both upward and downward movements equally—the Sortino Ratio only considers downside deviation, which measures how much returns fall below a minimum acceptable return (MAR). This focus on downside risk makes the Sortino Ratio a more precise measure of risk for conservative investors or those particularly sensitive to losses. By isolating the negative side of a portfolio’s volatility, it gives a clearer picture of how much risk is being taken for the returns generated.
The formula for the Sortino Ratio is:

Where:

Rₚ - Portfolio return
MAR - Minimum acceptable return
DDMAR - Downside deviation, a measure of the portfolio’s negative return volatility
The downside deviation (DDMAR) is calculated by focusing solely on the returns that fall below the minimum acceptable return (MAR), while ignoring any returns that exceed this threshold. This allows the Sortino Ratio to specifically measure the volatility from negative price movements, providing a more accurate view of risk.
The mathematical expression for downside deviation is:

Where:

rₜ - Return on day t
n - Number of periods (e.g., days, months)
MAR - Minimum acceptable return
Minimum Acceptable Return (MAR)
This is the threshold return that investors define based on their risk tolerance or financial goals. Essentially, any portfolio performance below this return level is considered undesirable or a loss for the investor. It serves as a benchmark for comparing returns. For example, if an investor’s MAR is set at 5%, any return below 5% would be considered insufficient or "downside."
Downside Deviation (DDMAR)
Downside deviation is a risk measure that focuses exclusively on the portfolio’s negative volatility, meaning it only considers returns that fall below the MAR. Unlike standard deviation, which measures both upside and downside volatility, downside deviation isolates the part of the return distribution that investors care most about—the returns below a minimum acceptable threshold (MAR). This makes it a more relevant measure of risk for those focused on avoiding losses.
Background and Key Differences from the Sharpe Ratio
The Sharpe Ratio uses the standard deviation of a portfolio’s returns as a measure of risk, meaning it treats both upward and downward volatility equally. This can be misleading because a portfolio that experiences large positive returns will have a higher standard deviation, potentially resulting in a lower Sharpe Ratio—even though those higher returns are actually favorable.
For many investors, especially those who prioritize capital preservation, treating positive volatility as "risky" is not ideal. Dr. Frank Sortino developed the Sortino Ratio in the early 1980s to address this issue. By removing upward volatility from the risk calculation and focusing solely on downside risk, the Sortino Ratio provides a better reflection of the quality of returns—specifically the actual risk that investors care about: the risk of negative returns.
This makes the Sortino Ratio particularly useful for investors or funds that are focused on minimizing downside risk rather than maximizing total returns. It also enables more accurate comparisons between portfolios or investments with similar returns but different risk profiles.
Omega Ratio
The omega ratio is an advanced risk-adjusted performance measure that offers a more detailed and nuanced view of risk. By considering the entire distribution of returns, the Omega Ratio is sensitive to both extreme gains and extreme losses, making it an essential tool for investors concerned about tail risk—those rare but significant market events that can drastically impact a portfolio's performance.
Unlike more commonly used metrics, like the Sharpe Ratio, which focus on mean return and standard deviation, the Omega Ratio places particular emphasis on the tail ends of the distribution. This ability to capture the full spectrum of returns—particularly at the extremes—makes the Omega Ratio highly valuable for evaluating portfolios or investments that may be exposed to asymmetric or non-normal risks.
Investors are often concerned not just with average performance but also with the risks associated with extreme outcomes—both positive and negative. Traditional metrics that rely on standard deviation may overlook these outliers, giving a less comprehensive picture of risk. The Omega Ratio, however, addresses this by considering the entire range of returns, making it especially useful for portfolios that experience fat tails or black swan events, where rare but severe outcomes can occur. By incorporating these extremes into the calculation, the Omega Ratio provides a more complete view of risk-adjusted performance, helping investors assess whether a portfolio's upside potential justifies its downside risk.
The omega ratio is defined as the ratio of gains above a certain threshold, the Minimum Acceptable Return (MAR), to the downside risk below that threshold. It measures the return relative to the risk of falling below the minimum acceptable level, giving investors a sense of how much return they can expect for each unit of downside risk they take.
The formula for the Omega Ratio is as follows:

Where:

Rₚ - Expected return of the asset or portfolio
MAR - Minimum Acceptable Return (the threshold level set by the investor)
rₜ - Actual return on day t
n - Period length or the total number of returns considered
The numerator of the formula calculates the gains that exceed the MAR, while the denominator focuses on the losses below the MAR. Essentially, the Omega Ratio compares the magnitude of returns above the threshold to the magnitude of returns below the threshold, providing a comprehensive view of the portfolio's performance relative to the set benchmark. This allows investors to assess whether the potential upside justifies the downside risk in the context of their risk tolerance.

Calmar Ratio

The Calmar Ratio is a widely used metric that measures the risk-adjusted performance of an investment portfolio by comparing returns to the maximum drawdown experienced during a given period. It provides a unique perspective on risk by focusing on the maximum drawdown—the largest decline from a portfolio's peak value to its lowest point—rather than volatility, which is commonly used in traditional metrics like the Sharpe Ratio.
The Calmar Ratio is particularly valuable for investors concerned with downside risk, as it shows how well a portfolio can withstand significant losses while still generating returns. By emphasizing the worst-case scenario, it offers a more intuitive measure of risk compared to metrics that focus solely on volatility.
In finance, maximizing returns is important, but managing drawdowns—periods when the portfolio loses significant value—is equally critical, especially for long-term investors. Drawdowns can take years to recover from, and a portfolio with high returns may still be unattractive if it suffers deep and prolonged declines.The Calmar Ratio addresses this issue by measuring the trade-off between return and risk specifically related to drawdowns. This makes it particularly useful for evaluating hedge funds, mutual funds, or any investment strategy where minimizing losses is a priority.
While metrics like the Sharpe Ratio and Sortino Ratio evaluate volatility or downside deviation, they may overlook extreme losses that could take years to recover from. The Calmar Ratio fills this gap by focusing on maximum drawdown, offering a clearer picture of the downside risk that many investors care about most.
The formula for the Calmar Ratio is as follows:

Where:

Rₚ - Expected return of the asset or portfolio
Rf - Risk-free rate
MD - Maximum drawdown
Understanding Maximum Drawdown (MD)
Maximum Drawdown (MD) is a key component of the Calmar Ratio and reflects the worst possible loss an investor could have experienced during the evaluated period. It is calculated by identifying the highest value the portfolio reached and comparing it to the lowest value it subsequently fell to before recovering.
For example, if a portfolio's peak value was $100,000, but it dropped to $80,000 before recovering, the maximum drawdown would be 20%. This metric is important because it doesn’t just show how much the portfolio earned, but also how much it could have lost during a downturn. This makes the Calmar Ratio particularly valuable for investors who prioritize capital preservation and are concerned about the resilience of their portfolios during market volatility. By focusing on the largest loss from peak to trough, investors gain a better understanding of the potential risk in their investment strategy, helping them make more informed decisions about managing downside risk.

Martin Ratio

The Martin Ratio is an invaluable tool for investors seeking a more sophisticated approach to evaluating their portfolio’s risk-adjusted performance. Unlike traditional performance metrics, which often focus on overall returns or volatility, the Martin Ratio takes into account the severity and duration of drawdowns—periods during which the portfolio declines in value from a previous peak. This makes it particularly useful for long-term investors who are concerned not only with returns but also with how well their portfolio manages periods of significant decline.
The Martin Ratio provides a clearer and more detailed understanding of the balance between risk and return, incorporating both the magnitude of returns and the risk of experiencing deep and prolonged drawdowns. By penalizing portfolios that suffer from extended downturns, the Martin Ratio offers a comprehensive measure of risk-adjusted performance, making it an indispensable tool for evaluating investments over time.
The Martin Ratio is a refined performance metric that accounts for both excess returns and drawdowns. While metrics like the Sharpe and Sortino Ratios focus on volatility or downside risk, the Martin Ratio goes further by incorporating drawdowns—the maximum percentage drop from a portfolio’s peak to its trough—into its risk assessment.
Drawdowns are particularly important for long-term investors because they can significantly affect an investment's recovery time and overall performance. A portfolio that experiences severe drawdowns may take years to recover, even if its long-term return appears strong. By factoring in these drawdowns, the Martin Ratio provides a more accurate representation of the risk taken to achieve returns.
The formula for the Martin Ratio is as follows:

Where:

Rₚ - Expected return of the asset or portfolio
Rf - Risk-free rate
n - The period length (total number of days or data points considered)
Dₜ - The drawdown from the previous peak on day t
Martin Ratio Formula and Key Concepts
This formula compares the excess return of the portfolio (the return above the risk-free rate) to the drawdown volatility, which is calculated as the square root of the average squared drawdowns over the period considered.
Drawdown (Dₜ): Refers to the percentage drop from the portfolio’s previous peak value to its lowest point during the period. By calculating the squared drawdowns over time, the Martin Ratio emphasizes both the depth and duration of these downturns. Portfolios with frequent or prolonged drawdowns will have a higher drawdown volatility, reducing the Martin Ratio.
Why Use the Martin Ratio?
The Martin Ratio provides a more detailed view of portfolio performance than traditional metrics by incorporating both returns and the risk of drawdowns. Here are several reasons why the Martin Ratio is an invaluable tool for investors:
Focus on Risk-Adjusted Returns:

While many metrics offer a measure of risk-adjusted return, the Martin Ratio goes beyond simple volatility and focuses on how well the portfolio manages prolonged losses. This makes it an essential metric for investors concerned about capital preservation and downside protection.Accounting for Drawdowns:

Drawdowns can have a significant impact on a portfolio’s long-term performance, especially if they are severe or last for an extended period. Traditional metrics may overlook the impact of these drawdowns, but the Martin Ratio penalizes portfolios for periods of steep or prolonged declines, offering a more accurate representation of risk.Comprehensive Risk Management:

The Martin Ratio helps investors assess not only how much return is generated per unit of risk, but also how well the portfolio recovers from downturns. This makes it an excellent metric for evaluating the resilience of a portfolio in volatile markets.

Epilogue

In the world of investing, success isn't solely defined by returns but by the balance between those returns and the risks taken to achieve them. The various risk-adjusted metrics explored throughout this eBook—Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin Ratios—offer a clear and strategic approach to evaluating investment performance with a deeper understanding of risk.
The financial markets are constantly evolving, with volatility and unpredictability playing a significant role in shaping outcomes. By using these metrics, investors can navigate these fluctuations with greater clarity, understanding how much risk is involved in the pursuit of returns. Each ratio provides unique insights into different aspects of risk management, from downside risk and extreme events to the severity and duration of drawdowns.
Incorporating these tools into an investment strategy allows for more informed decision-making. It becomes possible to identify which opportunities offer the best returns relative to the risks involved, compare different portfolios or funds with a clearer picture of their risk profiles, and build resilient strategies that can withstand market volatility.
Investors who understand the importance of risk-adjusted returns can approach their portfolios with greater confidence and discipline. Rather than chasing raw returns alone, the focus shifts toward preserving capital, managing risk, and building strategies that ensure sustainable, long-term growth. The Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin Ratios serve as invaluable guides in evaluating whether returns truly justify the risks, making them essential tools for those aiming to grow and protect wealth over time.
As the investment landscape continues to evolve, the ability to adapt is crucial. These metrics provide the foundation needed to approach challenges with an informed perspective, ensuring that investment decisions are grounded in a comprehensive understanding of both risks and rewards. The future of investing lies not just in seeking profit but in managing the journey with precision, insight, and a focus on long-term resilience.
The path forward is one of continual learning and adaptation. By integrating these risk-adjusted metrics into ongoing analysis, investors can enhance their approach to portfolio management and achieve a balance that aligns with their financial goals. The world of investing rewards those who understand both the opportunities and the risks, and these tools offer a way to navigate that landscape effectively.