Binance Square
SecGov
113,743 visningar
48 Inlägg
Rekommenderas
Senaste
LIVE
LIVE
The Crypto Basic
--
"Ripple CEO Takes Aim at Gary Gensler and SEC, Declares ChatGPT Can Craft Superior Rules"Brad Garlinghouse continues to criticize SEC chair Gary Gensler over his unfavorable crypto regulation, as he suggests that the U.S. should leverage ChatGPT to get tips on how to regulate the industry. Read more on: https://thecryptobasic.com/2024/01/19/ripple-ceo-slams-gary-gensler-and-sec-says-chatgpt-can-make-better-rules/ #RippleVsSEC #SecGov #cryptocurrecny #cryptoleads #CryptoNewsLand

"Ripple CEO Takes Aim at Gary Gensler and SEC, Declares ChatGPT Can Craft Superior Rules"

Brad Garlinghouse continues to criticize SEC chair Gary Gensler over his unfavorable crypto regulation, as he suggests that the U.S. should leverage ChatGPT to get tips on how to regulate the industry.
Read more on: https://thecryptobasic.com/2024/01/19/ripple-ceo-slams-gary-gensler-and-sec-says-chatgpt-can-make-better-rules/
#RippleVsSEC #SecGov #cryptocurrecny #cryptoleads #CryptoNewsLand
"SEC Delays Verdict on Fidelity's Ethereum Spot ETF, Leaving Markets Hanging"The SEC has delayed its decision on Fidelity’s proposed Ethereum spot ETF application, shifting the deadline from January 20 to March 5, 2024. Read more on: https://thecryptobasic.com/2024/01/19/sec-postpones-decision-on-fidelitys-ethereum-spot-etf/ #SecGov #spotETF #cryptocurrecny #cryptoleads #CryptonewswithJack

"SEC Delays Verdict on Fidelity's Ethereum Spot ETF, Leaving Markets Hanging"

The SEC has delayed its decision on Fidelity’s proposed Ethereum spot ETF application, shifting the deadline from January 20 to March 5, 2024.
Read more on: https://thecryptobasic.com/2024/01/19/sec-postpones-decision-on-fidelitys-ethereum-spot-etf/
#SecGov #spotETF #cryptocurrecny #cryptoleads #CryptonewswithJack
Absolutely yes
58%
No
15%
Not sure
27%
52 röster • Omröstningen avslutad
Hey traders hope you're doing good. I have to say that take your trades smartly because the market is very violate, especially after the recent #SecGov fake tweet. So stay safe #etf #BTC #SECApprovalJourney
Hey traders hope you're doing good. I have to say that take your trades smartly because the market is very violate, especially after the recent #SecGov fake tweet. So stay safe

#etf #BTC #SECApprovalJourney
🚨🚨🔥 BREAKING NEWS 🚀💥🌕 SEC vs Coinbase 🥂 🚨Judge Failla says: The SEC hasn’t presented an opposing narrative for the legal foundations of Howey in its briefing." The SEC is losing this case for sure.ins) It will be huge for all crypto market. #MANTA #TradeNTell #BTC #SecGov
🚨🚨🔥 BREAKING NEWS 🚀💥🌕

SEC vs Coinbase 🥂

🚨Judge Failla says: The SEC hasn’t presented an opposing narrative for the legal foundations of Howey in its briefing."

The SEC is losing this case for sure.ins)

It will be huge for all crypto market.

#MANTA #TradeNTell #BTC #SecGov
LIVE
--
Hausse
ETF Approval announcement time zone from now to night 2pm expected 🔥 stay updated, keep learning keep earning, follow me for early news📍 I will try my best to guide you people, but I am not financial advisor on any trade or etc. 📍 #BTC #BTCETFSPOT #ETFbitcoin #ETFs. #SecGov #BTC
ETF Approval announcement time zone from now to night 2pm expected 🔥 stay updated, keep learning keep earning, follow me for early news📍 I will try my best to guide you people, but I am not financial advisor on any trade or etc. 📍 #BTC #BTCETFSPOT #ETFbitcoin #ETFs. #SecGov #BTC
Ripple v. SEC: Next Key Deadline to Watch in Crypto Legal Battle#Write2Earn Ripple and SEC have entered 'remedies' phase of lawsuitThe legal battle between #RippleLabs  and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is heating up as both parties prepare for the next key deadline in the case.As Ripple and the SEC enter the "remedies" phase of the case focusing on institutional sales, the upcoming deadline in the case would be Feb. 20.Ripple scored a landmark win in the lawsuit in July 2023; however, the Court determined that certain $XRP institutional sales were investment contracts and hence should have been registered with the SEC.#XRPcommunity  #SecGov  v. Ripple XRP Ripple requests a one-week extension of the deadline for remedies-related discovery, from February 12, 2024 to February 20, 2024. pic.twitter.com/xjIZQuY7jQ— James K. Filan 🇺🇸🇮🇪 (@FilanLaw) February 6, 2024It should be recalled that earlier in February, Ripple requested a one-week extension of the deadline for remedies-related discovery from Feb. 12 to Feb. 20, making this the next crucial deadline in the legal battle.At this point, the discovery phase remains crucial, as it could reveal new information or arguments that could impact remedies.In a throwback to events that preceded this key timeline, the SEC served nine interrogatories and three RFPs on Ripple on Nov. 14.After the parties met and conferred on Dec. 21 and Jan. 3 to narrow the dispute, the SEC filed a motion on Jan. 11 to compel discovery of Ripple's financial statements for the years 2022 and 2023, post-complaint written contracts governing XRP sales to institutional buyers, hedge funds and ODL customers, and the proceeds Ripple received for delivering XRP after the complaint was filed, but under written contracts entered into before.On Feb. 5, Judge Netburn granted the SEC's motion to compel in full. Following Judge Netburn's decision, Ripple stated that it would disclose available financial statements and serve a response to the SEC's interrogatory about post-complaint proceeds from pre-complaint contracts by the prior discovery deadline of Feb. 12, 2024.Ripple, however, sought a brief extension until Feb. 20 to produce its contracts for the sale of XRP to institutional buyers, hedge funds and ODL customers from a rough three-year period before, citing the difficulty associated with trying to collect and produce those documents by the previous deadline.Ripple did not request changes to any other deadlines in this case, with these remaining the same. Legal briefs are expected to be submitted in March and April of this year, and then the Court will decide which remedies to impose.#TrendingTopic

Ripple v. SEC: Next Key Deadline to Watch in Crypto Legal Battle

#Write2Earn Ripple and SEC have entered 'remedies' phase of lawsuitThe legal battle between #RippleLabs  and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is heating up as both parties prepare for the next key deadline in the case.As Ripple and the SEC enter the "remedies" phase of the case focusing on institutional sales, the upcoming deadline in the case would be Feb. 20.Ripple scored a landmark win in the lawsuit in July 2023; however, the Court determined that certain $XRP institutional sales were investment contracts and hence should have been registered with the SEC.#XRPcommunity  #SecGov  v. Ripple XRP Ripple requests a one-week extension of the deadline for remedies-related discovery, from February 12, 2024 to February 20, 2024. pic.twitter.com/xjIZQuY7jQ— James K. Filan 🇺🇸🇮🇪 (@FilanLaw) February 6, 2024It should be recalled that earlier in February, Ripple requested a one-week extension of the deadline for remedies-related discovery from Feb. 12 to Feb. 20, making this the next crucial deadline in the legal battle.At this point, the discovery phase remains crucial, as it could reveal new information or arguments that could impact remedies.In a throwback to events that preceded this key timeline, the SEC served nine interrogatories and three RFPs on Ripple on Nov. 14.After the parties met and conferred on Dec. 21 and Jan. 3 to narrow the dispute, the SEC filed a motion on Jan. 11 to compel discovery of Ripple's financial statements for the years 2022 and 2023, post-complaint written contracts governing XRP sales to institutional buyers, hedge funds and ODL customers, and the proceeds Ripple received for delivering XRP after the complaint was filed, but under written contracts entered into before.On Feb. 5, Judge Netburn granted the SEC's motion to compel in full. Following Judge Netburn's decision, Ripple stated that it would disclose available financial statements and serve a response to the SEC's interrogatory about post-complaint proceeds from pre-complaint contracts by the prior discovery deadline of Feb. 12, 2024.Ripple, however, sought a brief extension until Feb. 20 to produce its contracts for the sale of XRP to institutional buyers, hedge funds and ODL customers from a rough three-year period before, citing the difficulty associated with trying to collect and produce those documents by the previous deadline.Ripple did not request changes to any other deadlines in this case, with these remaining the same. Legal briefs are expected to be submitted in March and April of this year, and then the Court will decide which remedies to impose.#TrendingTopic
"Court Slams SEC's Regulations as 'Vague and Loosey-Goosey'"SEC suffers another criticism in court as the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit describes its rules as vague and “loosey-goosey.” Read more on: https://thecryptobasic.com/2024/03/07/another-court-lambasts-sec-calls-its-rules-vague-and-loosey-goosey/ #SecGov #SEC #Crypto #CryptoNews🔒📰🚫 #CryptoNewsUpdate

"Court Slams SEC's Regulations as 'Vague and Loosey-Goosey'"

SEC suffers another criticism in court as the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit describes its rules as vague and “loosey-goosey.”

Read more on: https://thecryptobasic.com/2024/03/07/another-court-lambasts-sec-calls-its-rules-vague-and-loosey-goosey/
#SecGov #SEC #Crypto #CryptoNews🔒📰🚫 #CryptoNewsUpdate
"Coinbase Takes SEC to Court: Alleges Arbitrary Actions and Lack of Clarity in Crypto Regulations"Coinbase, the US-based cryptocurrency exchange, has initiated legal action against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), alleging that the regulatory body has acted arbitrarily and capriciously in refusing to adopt rules for clarifying oversight of the crypto industry. Coinbase asserts that the SEC has disregarded legal requirements in dismissing the company's formal rule-making petition for crypto regulations. The legal action, filed with the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, contends that the SEC claims authority over crypto assets while refusing to establish new rules for their treatment, and the agency did not provide a clear explanation for rejecting Coinbase's petition in December. According to Coinbase's legal representatives, the SEC's oversight of digital assets has been conducted through enforcement actions without a coherent framework. Gary Gensler, the SEC chairman, mentioned that the agency had been working on crypto rules, albeit not aligned with industry expectations, emphasizing the importance of maintaining discretion in setting rulemaking priorities. In response, Paul Grewal, Coinbase's legal officer, emphasized the lack of a clear reason for the SEC's inaction in the denial of the petition and stated that the public deserves an explanation and an opportunity to provide input. The legal dispute between Coinbase and the SEC is separate from the ongoing court battle over allegations of running an unregistered exchange listing unregistered crypto securities. Both cases highlight the SEC's reluctance to formally define crypto securities, leaving the industry in uncertainty. Coinbase's lawsuit aims to dismiss the SEC's previous disapproval and compel the agency to initiate new crypto rulemaking or provide a substantiated rationale for its position. The SEC has faced mixed outcomes in crypto-related court cases, experiencing defeats against Ripple and Grayscale but succeeding in an insider-trading case involving a former Coinbase employee. The industry closely watches these legal developments as they may shape the treatment of crypto exchanges under US securities law. The legal landscape is dynamic, with the potential for appeals and overturned decisions on the way to potential review by the US Supreme Court. #TrendingTopic #SecGov

"Coinbase Takes SEC to Court: Alleges Arbitrary Actions and Lack of Clarity in Crypto Regulations"

Coinbase, the US-based cryptocurrency exchange, has initiated legal action against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), alleging that the regulatory body has acted arbitrarily and capriciously in refusing to adopt rules for clarifying oversight of the crypto industry. Coinbase asserts that the SEC has disregarded legal requirements in dismissing the company's formal rule-making petition for crypto regulations. The legal action, filed with the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, contends that the SEC claims authority over crypto assets while refusing to establish new rules for their treatment, and the agency did not provide a clear explanation for rejecting Coinbase's petition in December.
According to Coinbase's legal representatives, the SEC's oversight of digital assets has been conducted through enforcement actions without a coherent framework. Gary Gensler, the SEC chairman, mentioned that the agency had been working on crypto rules, albeit not aligned with industry expectations, emphasizing the importance of maintaining discretion in setting rulemaking priorities. In response, Paul Grewal, Coinbase's legal officer, emphasized the lack of a clear reason for the SEC's inaction in the denial of the petition and stated that the public deserves an explanation and an opportunity to provide input.
The legal dispute between Coinbase and the SEC is separate from the ongoing court battle over allegations of running an unregistered exchange listing unregistered crypto securities. Both cases highlight the SEC's reluctance to formally define crypto securities, leaving the industry in uncertainty. Coinbase's lawsuit aims to dismiss the SEC's previous disapproval and compel the agency to initiate new crypto rulemaking or provide a substantiated rationale for its position.
The SEC has faced mixed outcomes in crypto-related court cases, experiencing defeats against Ripple and Grayscale but succeeding in an insider-trading case involving a former Coinbase employee. The industry closely watches these legal developments as they may shape the treatment of crypto exchanges under US securities law. The legal landscape is dynamic, with the potential for appeals and overturned decisions on the way to potential review by the US Supreme Court.

#TrendingTopic #SecGov
🚨 BREAKING: #SEC Chair Gary Gensler's statement on Spot #BitcoinETF approval. "We approved the listing and trading of certain spot bitcoin ETP shares today, but it's crucial to note that we did not endorse bitcoin." 🇺🇸 #BTC #etf #SecGov $BTC
🚨 BREAKING: #SEC Chair Gary Gensler's statement on Spot #BitcoinETF approval.

"We approved the listing and trading of certain spot bitcoin ETP shares today, but it's crucial to note that we did not endorse bitcoin." 🇺🇸
#BTC #etf #SecGov $BTC
How do bitcoin etfs differ from investing in bitcoin directly? Indirect Investment: When investing in a Bitcoin ETF, you are not directly purchasing Bitcoin. Instead, you are buying shares in a fund that holds a certain amount of Bitcoin. This means that you do not have direct ownership of the cryptocurrency, and you cannot use the Bitcoin ETF as a currency or for other purposes. Trading Platform: Bitcoin ETFs are traded on traditional securities exchanges, such as the New York Stock Exchange, while Bitcoin itself is traded on cryptocurrency exchanges. This difference in trading platforms can impact the ease of trading and the availability of Bitcoin for different types of investors. Custody and Storage: The financial institution managing the Bitcoin ETF is responsible for purchasing, storing, and safekeeping the Bitcoin on behalf of the ETF's investors. In contrast, when investing in Bitcoin directly, you would need to manage your own private keys and wallets, which can be more complex and less secure than relying on a professional custodian. Regulation and Taxation: Bitcoin ETFs are subject to traditional securities regulations, while Bitcoin itself is governed by cryptocurrency regulations. This difference can impact the tax treatment of the investments and the way they are regulated by various authorities. Pricing and Fees: The value of a Bitcoin ETF share reflects the performance of Bitcoin, but the share's value may not track the underlying Bitcoin's price precisely. Additionally, Bitcoin ETFs may charge fees for management, custody, and other services, which can affect the overall return on investment. When investing directly in Bitcoin, you would only need to consider the transaction fees and other costs associated with buying and selling the cryptocurrency. In summary, while both Bitcoin ETFs and investing directly in Bitcoin provide exposure to the cryptocurrency's price movements, they differ in terms of indirect investment, trading platform, custody and storage, regulation and taxation, and pricing and fees. #BTC #ETFsApproval #SecGov
How do bitcoin etfs differ from investing in bitcoin directly?
Indirect Investment: When investing in a Bitcoin ETF, you are not directly purchasing Bitcoin. Instead, you are buying shares in a fund that holds a certain amount of Bitcoin.
This means that you do not have direct ownership of the cryptocurrency, and you cannot use the Bitcoin ETF as a currency or for other purposes.
Trading Platform: Bitcoin ETFs are traded on traditional securities exchanges, such as the New York Stock Exchange, while Bitcoin itself is traded on cryptocurrency exchanges.
This difference in trading platforms can impact the ease of trading and the availability of Bitcoin for different types of investors.
Custody and Storage: The financial institution managing the Bitcoin ETF is responsible for purchasing, storing, and safekeeping the Bitcoin on behalf of the ETF's investors.
In contrast, when investing in Bitcoin directly, you would need to manage your own private keys and wallets, which can be more complex and less secure than relying on a professional custodian.
Regulation and Taxation: Bitcoin ETFs are subject to traditional securities regulations, while Bitcoin itself is governed by cryptocurrency regulations.
This difference can impact the tax treatment of the investments and the way they are regulated by various authorities.
Pricing and Fees: The value of a Bitcoin ETF share reflects the performance of Bitcoin, but the share's value may not track the underlying Bitcoin's price precisely.
Additionally, Bitcoin ETFs may charge fees for management, custody, and other services, which can affect the overall return on investment.
When investing directly in Bitcoin, you would only need to consider the transaction fees and other costs associated with buying and selling the cryptocurrency.
In summary, while both Bitcoin ETFs and investing directly in Bitcoin provide exposure to the cryptocurrency's price movements, they differ in terms of indirect investment, trading platform, custody and storage, regulation and taxation, and pricing and fees.
#BTC #ETFsApproval #SecGov
🚨 Update on Coinbase vs SEC Legal Battle 🚨 The first round of oral arguments has concluded, and the judge, Katherine Polk Failla, is impressed with Coinbase's grasp of the complex issues. The DeFi community's amicus brief, praised by the judge, argued that Coinbase's staking doesn't qualify as an unregistered security. Judge Failla questioned the SEC's reliance on the Howey Test, citing crypto-supportive Senator Cynthia Lummis's perspective: "We've had 90 years where these securities laws have applied. But now we have something new." Coinbase contends the SEC's interpretation is too broad. The company's lawyer argued, "I think there would have been a lot of surprise in the 1933/1934 Congress to find an investment contract didn’t have anything to do with a contract at all." Awaiting the judge's decision, legal experts suggest a 2 to 6-week timeframe. Will this case follow Ripple Labs' prolonged legal battle with the SEC? Stay tuned for updates! #CryptoNews. #Coinbase. #SecGov #trendingtoday
🚨 Update on Coinbase vs SEC Legal Battle 🚨
The first round of oral arguments has concluded, and the judge, Katherine Polk Failla, is impressed with Coinbase's grasp of the complex issues. The DeFi community's amicus brief, praised by the judge, argued that Coinbase's staking doesn't qualify as an unregistered security.
Judge Failla questioned the SEC's reliance on the Howey Test, citing crypto-supportive Senator Cynthia Lummis's perspective: "We've had 90 years where these securities laws have applied. But now we have something new." Coinbase contends the SEC's interpretation is too broad.
The company's lawyer argued, "I think there would have been a lot of surprise in the 1933/1934 Congress to find an investment contract didn’t have anything to do with a contract at all."
Awaiting the judge's decision, legal experts suggest a 2 to 6-week timeframe. Will this case follow Ripple Labs' prolonged legal battle with the SEC? Stay tuned for updates!
#CryptoNews. #Coinbase. #SecGov #trendingtoday
"SEC's Legal Battles with Ripple, Coinbase End in Defeat - What Happened Behind Closed Doors?"A prominent SEC attorney who spearheaded litigation against Ripple and Coinbase has announced her departure from the commission, resulting in a major setback for the agency. Read more on: https://thecryptobasic.com/2024/02/22/sec-suffers-major-blow-in-lawsuits-against-ripple-and-coinbase-details/ #SecGov #Crypto #CryptoNews🔒📰🚫 #CryptoNewsUpdate #CryptoNewsFlash

"SEC's Legal Battles with Ripple, Coinbase End in Defeat - What Happened Behind Closed Doors?"

A prominent SEC attorney who spearheaded litigation against Ripple and Coinbase has announced her departure from the commission, resulting in a major setback for the agency.

Read more on: https://thecryptobasic.com/2024/02/22/sec-suffers-major-blow-in-lawsuits-against-ripple-and-coinbase-details/
#SecGov #Crypto #CryptoNews🔒📰🚫 #CryptoNewsUpdate #CryptoNewsFlash
🚨Spot bitcoin ETFs to start trading in big boost to crypto industry(Reuters) - Several exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tied to the spot price of bitcoin will start trading in the U.S. on Thursday before the bell in a landmark moment for the cryptocurrency industry that has been demanding regulatory approval for more than a decade.The green light from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission finally came late on Wednesday as it approved 11 such ETFs, ending months of negotiations with top asset managers such as BlackRock, Ark Investments/21Shares, Fidelity, Invesco and VanEck."The approval has the potential to simplify and secure Bitcoin investments for a broader investor base, which may reshape the dynamics of cryptocurrency investments," said Rajeev Bamra, senior vice-president of digital finance at Moody's Investors Service.BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust began trading in early premarket hours. VanEck Bitcoin Trust, Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF, and ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF are expected to start soon.RACE FOR MARKET SHAREThe regulatory nod is expected to start an intense competition for market share among the issuers who have already lowered the fees for the products well below the U.S. ETF industry's standard.Analysts at Bernstein estimated that bitcoin ETF flows will build up gradually to cross $10 billion in 2024 in its race to $80 billion by the end of next year."Bitcoin ETFs are expected to be an intensely competitive asset accumulation game, with 11 leading asset managers launching together," the brokerage said in a note.Since all the ETFs tracking an asset's price are designed to deliver the same return to investors, fees tend to dictate market share.The issuers have disclosed fees as low as 0.20% and some have offered to waive it off for a particular period or until it accumulates a set amount in assets.Many ETFs issuers, including Bitwise and VanEck, have already begun marketing their products by releasing ads that tout bitcoin as an investment.#BTC #etf #SecGov #Sec #SECApprovalJourney

🚨Spot bitcoin ETFs to start trading in big boost to crypto industry

(Reuters) - Several exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tied to the spot price of bitcoin will start trading in the U.S. on Thursday before the bell in a landmark moment for the cryptocurrency industry that has been demanding regulatory approval for more than a decade.The green light from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission finally came late on Wednesday as it approved 11 such ETFs, ending months of negotiations with top asset managers such as BlackRock, Ark Investments/21Shares, Fidelity, Invesco and VanEck."The approval has the potential to simplify and secure Bitcoin investments for a broader investor base, which may reshape the dynamics of cryptocurrency investments," said Rajeev Bamra, senior vice-president of digital finance at Moody's Investors Service.BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust began trading in early premarket hours. VanEck Bitcoin Trust, Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF, and ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF are expected to start soon.RACE FOR MARKET SHAREThe regulatory nod is expected to start an intense competition for market share among the issuers who have already lowered the fees for the products well below the U.S. ETF industry's standard.Analysts at Bernstein estimated that bitcoin ETF flows will build up gradually to cross $10 billion in 2024 in its race to $80 billion by the end of next year."Bitcoin ETFs are expected to be an intensely competitive asset accumulation game, with 11 leading asset managers launching together," the brokerage said in a note.Since all the ETFs tracking an asset's price are designed to deliver the same return to investors, fees tend to dictate market share.The issuers have disclosed fees as low as 0.20% and some have offered to waive it off for a particular period or until it accumulates a set amount in assets.Many ETFs issuers, including Bitwise and VanEck, have already begun marketing their products by releasing ads that tout bitcoin as an investment.#BTC #etf #SecGov #Sec #SECApprovalJourney
- 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙖𝙬𝙨𝙪𝙞𝙩 𝙗𝙚𝙩𝙬𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙍𝙞𝙥𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙎𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙨 𝙎𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙀𝙭𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚 𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣 (𝙎𝙀𝘾) 𝙞𝙨 𝙣𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖 𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙞𝙣 𝘼𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙡 2023. - 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙖𝙬𝙨𝙪𝙞𝙩, 𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙣 𝘿𝙚𝙘𝙚𝙢𝙗𝙚𝙧 2020, 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙜𝙚𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙍𝙞𝙥𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙙𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙣 𝙪𝙣𝙧𝙚𝙜𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙙 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛𝙛𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙗𝙮 𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙓𝙍𝙋, 𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 $1.3 𝙗𝙞𝙡𝙡𝙞𝙤𝙣. - 𝙍𝙞𝙥𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙓𝙍𝙋 𝙞𝙨 𝙖 𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙮, 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙖 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙞𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙀𝘾'𝙨 𝙟𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙨𝙙𝙞𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣. - 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙨𝙘𝙝𝙚𝙙𝙪𝙡𝙚𝙙 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝘼𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙡 2023 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙨𝙞𝙜𝙣𝙞𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙧𝙮𝙥𝙩𝙤𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙮 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙤𝙧, 𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙚'𝙨 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙘𝙡𝙪𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙢𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙗𝙚 𝙞𝙢𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙣𝙩, 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙥𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙡𝙨. - 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙟𝙪𝙙𝙜𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙖𝙣 𝘼𝙄-𝙥𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙙 𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙩𝙗𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙤𝙘𝙘𝙪𝙧 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙪𝙢𝙢𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙛 2024, 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙡𝙨 𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙗𝙡𝙮 𝙚𝙭𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙤𝙪𝙩𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙡 2026. - 𝘼 𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙤𝙡𝙪𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙗𝙚𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙙𝙞𝙘𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙞𝙛 𝙗𝙤𝙩𝙝 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙞𝙚𝙨 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙝 𝙖 𝙢𝙪𝙩𝙪𝙖𝙡 𝙖𝙜𝙧𝙚𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙍𝙞𝙥𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙚 𝙘𝙧𝙪𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙩 𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙨 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙡𝙖𝙨𝙩 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧. #SecGov #XRP🚀 #Write2Earn
- 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙖𝙬𝙨𝙪𝙞𝙩 𝙗𝙚𝙩𝙬𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙍𝙞𝙥𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙎𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙨 𝙎𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙀𝙭𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚 𝘾𝙤𝙢𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣 (𝙎𝙀𝘾) 𝙞𝙨 𝙣𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖 𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙞𝙣 𝘼𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙡 2023.

- 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙖𝙬𝙨𝙪𝙞𝙩, 𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙣 𝘿𝙚𝙘𝙚𝙢𝙗𝙚𝙧 2020, 𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙜𝙚𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙍𝙞𝙥𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙙𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙣 𝙪𝙣𝙧𝙚𝙜𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙙 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛𝙛𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙗𝙮 𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙓𝙍𝙋, 𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 $1.3 𝙗𝙞𝙡𝙡𝙞𝙤𝙣.

- 𝙍𝙞𝙥𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙓𝙍𝙋 𝙞𝙨 𝙖 𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙮, 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙖 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙞𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙀𝘾'𝙨 𝙟𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙨𝙙𝙞𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣.

- 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙨𝙘𝙝𝙚𝙙𝙪𝙡𝙚𝙙 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝘼𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙡 2023 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙨𝙞𝙜𝙣𝙞𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙧𝙮𝙥𝙩𝙤𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙮 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙤𝙧, 𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙚'𝙨 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙘𝙡𝙪𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙢𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙗𝙚 𝙞𝙢𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙣𝙩, 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙥𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙡𝙨.

- 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙟𝙪𝙙𝙜𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙖𝙣 𝘼𝙄-𝙥𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙙 𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙩𝙗𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙤𝙘𝙘𝙪𝙧 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙪𝙢𝙢𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙛 2024, 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙡𝙨 𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙗𝙡𝙮 𝙚𝙭𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙤𝙪𝙩𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙡 2026.

- 𝘼 𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙤𝙡𝙪𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙗𝙚𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙙𝙞𝙘𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙞𝙛 𝙗𝙤𝙩𝙝 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙞𝙚𝙨 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙝 𝙖 𝙢𝙪𝙩𝙪𝙖𝙡 𝙖𝙜𝙧𝙚𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙍𝙞𝙥𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙚 𝙘𝙧𝙪𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙩 𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙨 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙡𝙖𝙨𝙩 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧.

#SecGov #XRP🚀 #Write2Earn
yes
89%
yes
11%
84 röster • Omröstningen avslutad
Utforska de senaste kryptonyheterna
⚡️ Var en del av de senaste diskussionerna inom krypto
💬 Interagera med dina favoritkreatörer
👍 Ta del av innehåll som intresserar dig
E-post/telefonnummer