Christine Rubick SzYs
Following
Followers
Liked
Shared
See original
Gift code<3
BP84L5ZEL8
BP84L5ZEL8
See original
#HotTrends #maximalists #Bitcoin✅ #MoneyGram
I'm new and I really want to learn, someone give me a tip to get off to a good start (he says it in the nicest way) thank you <3
I'm new and I really want to learn, someone give me a tip to get off to a good start (he says it in the nicest way) thank you <3
See original
$ETH $#HotTrends #HotTrends #HotTrends #HotTrends #HotTrends Altcoins are flooding ahead of schedule, is Bitcoin falling to 56,000?
There is a teacher in the comment area. Yesterday, a fan who left a message said very confidently: "Master, I concluded that BTC will bottom out at 60,000 to 70,000, and the upper and lower range will not exceed 10%." It always seems a little strange. The upper and lower 10% intervals are already 12,000 points apart; Even if you reduce it to the upper and lower 5% intervals, there is a distance of 6,000 points. Isn't this range? A little big?
You could also say to me like this: "Master, I use 60,000 points as the bottom point, and the top and bottom points should not exceed 50%." Then you are still right. This reminds me of Sun Tzu's Art of War: "Raise autumn without using too much force, see the sun and moon without improving eyesight, hear thunder without improving hearing." For real technical analysis, or if you are more confident, the error is 1% to 3%. If you give me all 10% or even 5%, you are throwing stones at the elephant. How can you miss the mark?
Basically, now I don't predict points or look for high-density contracts. A 3% or even 5% error is acceptable to me, so the current points don't make sense to me. Eat more than that 3% %Can Will I be rich? If I eat less than that 3%, won't I be rich? No, why bother? Just let yourself go!
Then here I give two baffle intervals for reference. If the first baffle interval 62058 is broken, the subsequent bottom is more likely to fall near 56074 points, mainly the closing price of the Eastern Eighth District, with the upper and lower ranges Control it at 1.5%. What I'm talking about is preventing it in advance for everyone. If it doesn't happen, it's better. Don't panic when it arrives!
Magic makes a wave of corrections, deviating from the trend line by some distance. This is a special correction, and it is more likely to be a pit.
There is a teacher in the comment area. Yesterday, a fan who left a message said very confidently: "Master, I concluded that BTC will bottom out at 60,000 to 70,000, and the upper and lower range will not exceed 10%." It always seems a little strange. The upper and lower 10% intervals are already 12,000 points apart; Even if you reduce it to the upper and lower 5% intervals, there is a distance of 6,000 points. Isn't this range? A little big?
You could also say to me like this: "Master, I use 60,000 points as the bottom point, and the top and bottom points should not exceed 50%." Then you are still right. This reminds me of Sun Tzu's Art of War: "Raise autumn without using too much force, see the sun and moon without improving eyesight, hear thunder without improving hearing." For real technical analysis, or if you are more confident, the error is 1% to 3%. If you give me all 10% or even 5%, you are throwing stones at the elephant. How can you miss the mark?
Basically, now I don't predict points or look for high-density contracts. A 3% or even 5% error is acceptable to me, so the current points don't make sense to me. Eat more than that 3% %Can Will I be rich? If I eat less than that 3%, won't I be rich? No, why bother? Just let yourself go!
Then here I give two baffle intervals for reference. If the first baffle interval 62058 is broken, the subsequent bottom is more likely to fall near 56074 points, mainly the closing price of the Eastern Eighth District, with the upper and lower ranges Control it at 1.5%. What I'm talking about is preventing it in advance for everyone. If it doesn't happen, it's better. Don't panic when it arrives!
Magic makes a wave of corrections, deviating from the trend line by some distance. This is a special correction, and it is more likely to be a pit.