This article comes from: Andrew Kang, co-founder of Mechanism Capital
Translator: Odaily Planet Daily Azuma
Editor's note: This article is an analysis of ETH's future performance by Andrew Kang, co-founder of Mechanism Capital. In the article, Andrew focused on analyzing the potential scale of capital inflows into Ethereum spot ETFs, and combined with the differences in the market structure of ETH and BTC, he made a radical prediction that "the ETH/BTC exchange rate will continue to fall in the next year, and the range may be between 0.035 and 0.06."
The following is Andrew’s full text, translated by Odaily Planet Daily.
The launch of a Bitcoin spot ETF provides many potential new buyers with the opportunity to include BTC in their portfolios, but relatively speaking, the impact of an Ethereum spot ETF on ETH itself may not be so obvious.
When BlackRock submitted its Bitcoin spot ETF application, BTC was around $25,000 and I gave an optimistic forecast. Since then, BTC has returned 2.6 times, ETH has returned 2.1 times, and if we start from the bottom of the cycle, BTC has returned 4 times, and Ethereum has also returned 4 times.
So, how much growth can the Ethereum spot ETF bring this time? First of all, I think that unless Ethereum finds an effective way to improve its economic effects, the growth space will be very limited.
ETF Net Inflow Analysis
Overall, Bitcoin spot ETFs have now accumulated over $50 billion in AUM (assets under management).
This is a fairly optimistic number. However, if you strip out the GBTC-related fund flows, you will find that the net inflow will shrink to $14.5 billion.
In fact, this number still needs to be further reduced because it still includes many "delta neutral" transactions, especially some "basis trades" (such as buying ETFs while selling futures) and "spot rotations" (i.e. selling spot and buying ETFs). According to CME data and analysis of ETF holders, about $4.5 billion of capital inflows are related to "basis trades"; in addition, some ETF experts have pointed out that large institutions such as BlockOne have carried out huge "spot rotation" operations, and the scale of such transactions is expected to be about $5 billion. Excluding these "delta neutral" transactions, we can infer that the actual net inflow of Bitcoin spot ETFs is about $5 billion.
Based on this data, we can proceed to predict potential inflows into the Ethereum spot ETF.
Bloomberg analyst Eric Balchunas has estimated that Ethereum spot ETFs could see 10% of the flow of Bitcoin spot ETFs. This means that within six months of the Ethereum spot ETF launching trading, the reported net inflows could be around $1.5 billion, but the actual net inflows would be around $500 million. While Balchunas has made some mistakes in his predictions about ETF approval, I think his pessimism about the Ethereum spot ETF is informative because it reflects the broader traditional financial market’s interest in the product.
Personally, my base case is that the Ethereum spot ETF could have 15% of the flow of the Bitcoin spot ETF. Using the same $5 billion base, plus an adjustment factor of 33% of the market cap of Bitcoin, and a 0.5 “access factor,” we get $840 million in actual net inflows and $2.52 billion in reported net inflows.
Note: The "access factor" here means that the potential flow that an ETF can bring to BTC may be greater than the potential flow that it can bring to ETH, because the potential purchasers of the two are different. BTC, as a macro-oriented asset, may be more attractive to macro funds, pensions, sovereign wealth funds, etc., while ETH, as a technical asset, may be more popular with venture capital funds, crypto funds, technical experts, retail investors, etc., and groups interested in ETH will have fewer restrictions when trading cryptocurrencies. The 50% figure is derived by comparing the CME open interest to market value ratio of ETH and BTC.
Given the reasonable additional point made by some analysts regarding the relatively small supply of ETHE compared to GBTC, in a more optimistic scenario, I forecast actual net inflows of $1.5 billion and reported net inflows of $4.5 billion. This is roughly 30% of Bitcoin spot ETF flows.
In any case, the actual net inflow of the Ethereum spot ETF will be much lower than the derivatives trading volume generated by the ETF expectation, which is about $2.8 billion, and some spot front-running transactions are not included here. This shows that the expectation of the ETF has been fully digested by the market.
According to CME data, before the ETF was launched, ETH's open interest was also much lower than BTC's - ETH's contract size accounted for about 0.3% of the supply, and BTC accounted for about 0.6%. At first I thought it was just because ETH was relatively "early", but it may also indicate that the traditional financial community is not interested in Ethereum spot ETFs. Traders who have made huge profits during the trading cycle of Bitcoin ETFs usually have very accurate information. If they do not repeat the same operation on ETH, this may indicate that the flow performance of Ethereum spot ETFs will be relatively poor.
How to drive BTC up with $5 billion?
How did only $5 billion pull BTC from $40,000 to $65,000? Let’s continue to throw out the conclusion first. It didn’t do it.
There are many other buyers in the spot market. Bitcoin has truly become an investment asset with a certain degree of recognition worldwide, with many institutional buyers, such as MicroStrategy, Tether, family offices, high net worth individual investors, etc. Ethereum also has some institutional buyers, but their scale is much smaller than Bitcoin.
It is important to note that before the Bitcoin spot ETF started trading, the price of BTC had reached $69,000 and the market value exceeded $1.2 trillion. Various market participants, including institutions, hold a large amount of BTC spot. Coinbase has custody of up to $193 billion in assets, of which $100 billion comes from institutional clients; Bitgo has reported that its asset custody scale is $60 billion; Binance has custody of assets exceeding $100 billion. Six months after the Bitcoin spot ETF started trading, the ETF "only" custody 4% of the total supply of Bitcoin, which is meaningful, but only a small part of the market demand.
Another difference to note is that when the Bitcoin spot ETF was launched, the market was also slightly underfunded. At the time, the market generally believed that the launch of the ETF would cause BTC to fall in the short term, with a "peak as soon as it goes online". As a result, a large amount of funds left the market before the launch of the Bitcoin spot ETF, and then bought back in when it fell (magnifying the scale of ETF inflows), and when the ETF showed good liquidity, some shorts had to cover their positions. The data proves that the size of BTC's open interest actually fell before the Bitcoin spot ETF started trading.
The situation of Ethereum spot ETF is completely different. Before the launch of the ETF, the price of ETH had reached 4 times the low point of this round, while the price of BTC at that time was only 2.75 times the low point. In the derivatives market, the size of ETH open interest (OI) in cryptocurrency native exchanges has increased by 2.1 billion US dollars, bringing the size of open interest to close to the historical high. This means that many traders familiar with cryptocurrencies also expect ETH to achieve the same effect after seeing the success of Bitcoin ETF, and have made corresponding arrangements.
But in my opinion, the expectations of cryptocurrency practitioners may be too high, and these expectations do not match the actual preferences of the traditional financial market. People who have been focusing on the crypto field for many years usually have a high level of attention and trust in Ethereum, but in fact, in the eyes of many capital groups in the non-cryptocurrency field, Ethereum is much less attractive as a key asset.
When we promote Ethereum to traditional finance, we often use "technical assets" as the entry point, emphasizing its value as a global computer, Web3 application store, decentralized financial settlement layer, etc. This argument still has some appeal in previous cycles, but if you put the actual data on the table, you will find that this promotion model is not so convincing.
In past cycles, you could cite the growth rate of transaction fees to show how DeFi and NFTs would create more fees and cash flow for Ethereum, thereby shaping Ethereum into a "tech asset" similar to tech stocks. However, in the current cycle, the quantification of these fees has had the opposite effect - data shows that Ethereum's fees are stagnant or even negative. Although Ethereum itself is still a sustainable "cash" machine, with only $150 million in revenue per month, a 300x price-to-sales ratio, and a negative price-to-earnings ratio, how will analysts prove to their family offices or fund bosses that ETH's current price is reasonable?
In addition, I think there are not many "delta neutral" trades around ETFs in the first few weeks after the ETFs start trading for two main reasons. First, the sudden approval of ETH caught many people by surprise, and the issuer did not have enough time to market the ETF to large institutions; second, for ordinary ETH holders, there is less motivation to convert their positions to ETFs, because it means that they need to give up the yield that can be achieved through staking, DeFi farming, etc. Although the current overall staking rate of ETH is only 25%.
Does this mean that ETH will return to zero? Of course not, at a certain price point, ETH will still be considered valuable, and when BTC continues to rise in the future, ETH will also be driven up to a certain extent.
Before the Ethereum spot ETF is launched, I expect ETH to trade in the range of $3,000 to $3,800; after the ETF is launched, my expectation is $2,400 to $3,000. However, if BTC rises to $100,000 in the fourth quarter or the first quarter of next year, this may drive ETH to a new high, but the exchange rate between ETH and BTC will be lower.
I expect the ETH/BTC exchange rate to continue to fall over the next year, probably between 0.035 and 0.06. Although our observable sample is small, we do see that the highs of the ETH/BTC exchange rate have become lower in each cycle, so it would not be too surprising to see this happen again.
