Is there a contempt chain in the cryptocurrency circle? Of course there is. For example, those who invest in serious projects almost all look down on those who play with the plate and cut leeks. But as the saying goes, there are top talents in all 360 professions, and there are people who are good at every kind of play. There is no need to criticize people in public, nor is there any need to criticize the play method, and there is no need to praise one and criticize the other.
I suggest that you should vigorously promote the gameplay that you like and are good at. If you are low-key, you can make money quietly. Don't DISS. Don't forget, DISSing gameplay and DISSing projects is equivalent to DISSing everyone behind them.
This is the case with people, and the cognitive level must keep up. Next, I will talk about several controversial ways of playing in the currency circle.
The two major value indicators to help you understand are whether there is precipitation and whether there is internal contradiction.
Momo
Pulling the wool is very similar to farming, which is in line with the instinct of farming people. Spring plowing and autumn harvest are a long process. Only after the harvest, the participants have truly entered a positive cycle. Their hearts and hands are stable and they continue to devote themselves to "farming".
Does pulling hair make you invincible? Will you definitely make money? Not really. Farming may not yield any harvest. The time it takes to get harvested is enough to defeat most people. You can't say that those who can't pull hair are all lazy people without faith. In my opinion, most people are not suitable for pulling hair. Those who can pull hair and get big results are the chosen ones. This is "talent". Have you ever thought that persistence is also a talent?
Besides, think about tilling the land, what will happen to people? Their brains tend to become rigid, and they have few ideas other than expanding reproduction. Is this good or bad? I'll leave it to you to judge.
Is there any accumulation after pulling the wool? Of course there is, it is very obvious. How many tasks are completed today is equivalent to how many seeds are planted, how much preparation is done is equivalent to how many useful tools are prepared. There must be accumulation. Is there any internal contradiction? There is only the contradiction between ideal and reality. You can only pull if you want to make money. If you don’t pull, you won’t make money. Repeated pulling will eventually consume yourself.
Dog
At present, Chonggou is obviously fundamentally different from the previous BSC10U Ares. The BSC chain has become the bottom of the contempt chain because there are too many and too chaotic CXs in China. SOL, BASE and even the recently popular ETH have pushed the MEME fever to the height of a serious matter. Many people can proudly call themselves Golden Dog Hunters and have a lot of fun. I have to say a few more words about that.
Dog hunting is indeed very much like a hunting game, where you look for valuable prey (suspected good dogs) among a large number of animals (new B) based on their characteristics (various indicators), and then shoot (buy) them with bullets (funds). You may be able to sell them at a good price (high price), or you may run out of bullets and get nothing (loss), or even be killed by the prey (lose all).
So the question is, how can you make money in dog hunting? That depends on the hunter's level. How can the hunter's level be improved? Only those who survive and have experience, the experienced old hunter, can carry out large-scale hunting activities without dying. The answer is clear, dog hunting requires more learning and more attempts, small steps of trial and error, and frequent reflection. Success will come in time.
Does charging a dog accumulate experience? Frequent combat and survival usually lead to experience accumulation. Doesn't a reckless person who refuses to change his ways have internal contradictions? What contradictions can there be in hunting? Just take more actions.
Some people say that hunting dogs is gambling. In fact, if hunting dogs is gambling, it means that the person is really stupid. If you think about it this way, how can it be considered gambling when a person goes out hunting? Do you always want to die? I am more inclined to define hunting dogs as playing games. Who plays games just to die? Wouldn't they learn their lesson after playing a few times?
contract
We rarely mention contracts because we don’t even touch them, so everything that follows is subjective.
Contracts are gambling, because short-term trading itself is gambling, and the rise and fall are impossible to predict. If it is compared to hunting, the environment is very bad, making people confused and unreasonable.
What data can short-term traders refer to? K-line related, extremely abstract, gradually developed into a form of feeling, indescribable, different from person to person. In my understanding, any knowledge storage that can reach this level is undoubtedly related to metaphysics.
Is gambling hopeless? No, that's not true. The essence of gambling is to have a stable mentality, abide by discipline, and not challenge yourself casually. For example, there are two kinds of balls in a bag, red and blue. The blue balls account for 60% and the red balls account for 40%. Now you are asked to touch the balls with your eyes closed, and then guess the color. The one who guesses correctly wins. What is the most rational way to play? As long as I keep guessing blue, it's fine, right? But many people find it boring and always want to guess red occasionally.
Is there any internal conflict? Strictly speaking, there is no internal friction. It is just gambling. There is internal friction only when you regret after gambling. There is no conflict in the process. This is exactly the scary point. However, there is a huge contradiction behind gambling. What is the identity of the people in the gambling game? The dealer will make a profit without losing money. The gamblers will fight each other. Solve the big contradiction first, and most of the problems will be solved.
plate
Panzi has said it many times, the essence is brainwashing, making things out of nothing, mind control, a modern cult, wandering in northern Myanmar
Is there any accumulation in playing the game? PUA and anti-PUA techniques may have accumulation, which can fool people and not be fooled, or pretend to be confused when knowing the truth, etc., but in the long run, there may not be any accumulation in resources. Because the brain is often in extremely tangled scenes, it suffers irreversible damage, and the whole person is in a bad spirit. Maybe he can't make money, and he can't accumulate people. The overdraft is far greater than the accumulation. Is there any internal contradiction in the greasy temperament? There are too many contradictions. I am calculating others every day. When can I feel happy? I really can't bear to say it anymore.
In conclusion
Stroke is farming, dog-whipping is hunting, contract is gambling, plate is brainwashing
Farming may not yield any harvest, hunters may become prey, gambling may lose all the money overnight, and the family may be destroyed.
But every gameplay has its own experts: farmers perfecting farm tools, hunters polishing weapons, experienced gamblers observing discipline, and masters cultivating their mentality optimizing their rhetoric and improving PUA.
The three most important points are: Which gameplay is the most valuable? Are there any serious internal contradictions? Does external identity determine most of the success or failure?
All the answers are in your heart