Home
Notification
Profile
Trending Articles
News
Bookmarked and Liked
Creator Center
Settings
LIVE
Uncle Mose
--
Follow
$NOT
price is going down to 0.020 before it will bounce back
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content.
Â
See T&Cs.
NOT
0.00786
+3.01%
308
0
Replies
0
Explore the latest crypto news
âĄïž Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
đŹ Interact with your favorite creators
đ Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Sign Up
Login
Relevant Creator
LIVE
Uncle Mose
@unclemose74
Follow
Explore More From Creator
$TON A message by Durev â€ïž Thanks everyone for your support and love! Last month I got interviewed by police for 4 days after arriving in Paris. I was told I may be personally responsible for other peopleâs illegal use of Telegram, because the French authorities didnât receive responses from Telegram. This was surprising for several reasons: 1. Telegram has an official representative in the EU that accepts and replies to EU requests. Its email address has been publicly available for anyone in the EU who googles âTelegram EU address for law enforcementâ. 2. The French authorities had numerous ways to reach me to request assistance. As a French citizen, I was a frequent guest at the French consulate in Dubai. A while ago, when asked, I personally helped them establish a hotline with Telegram to deal with the threat of terrorism in France. 3. If a country is unhappy with an internet service, the established practice is to start a legal action against the service itself. Using laws from the pre-smartphone era to charge a CEO with crimes committed by third parties on the platform he manages is a misguided approach. Building technology is hard enough as it is. No innovator will ever build new tools if they know they can be personally held responsible for potential abuse of those tools. Establishing the right balance between privacy and security is not easy. You have to reconcile privacy laws with law enforcement requirements, and local laws with EU laws. You have to take into account technological limitations. As a platform, you want your processes to be consistent globally, while also ensuring they are not abused in countries with weak rule of law. Weâve been committed to engaging with regulators to find the right balance. Yes, we stand by our principles: our experience is shaped by our mission to protect our users in authoritarian regimes. But weâve always been open to dialogue. Sometimes we canât agree with a countryâs regulator on the right balance between privacy and security. In those cases, we are ready to leave that country.
--
Yes is time to hope in and make profit on $NOT now before is too late
--
$NOT I'm really disappointed in Notcoin this circle I expect more than that shitty performance
--
$NOT volume is too low but the price is ok think
--
$BTC to 64k
--
Latest News
DeepLink Completes Public Sale, Raises Over $10 Million
--
US Representative Advocates Regulation Over Ban Of Election Prediction Markets
--
Bitcoin(BTC) Drops Below 60,000 USDT with a Narrowed 3.53% Increase in 24 Hours
--
Jump Trading Withdraws 18.98 Million USDT From CEX
--
Uniswap CEO Denies $20 Million Deployment Fee Rumors
--
View More
Trending Articles
Fed Warning: Bitcoin And Crypto On The âCuspâ Of A Major Price Shock â ïžđ„
Supermacho
XRP News Today: Ripple Not Reliant on Holders As Whales Accumulate 330M XRP
CoinChapter
Why Rippleâs XRP Hasnât Reached $5 XRP Price This Year, Seasoned Investor Explains
ZyCrypto
Hamster Kombat's $HMSTR Token: A Pre-Launch Analysis
Holaitsak47
Vitalik Buterin Names the Only Layer-2 Networks He Will Endorse in 2025
CryptoPotato
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs
