You are wrong. The official data shows that the FIL main network data is 220m TB, which is 1000 times larger than AR's 255pb=261120TB. It is meaningless to compare this. Arweave has been positioned differently from FIL from the beginning. One is open permanent storage for the public, and the other encourages large-scale storage, most of which is private data. FIL is the incentive layer of the decentralized storage protocol IPFS. To be honest, if I install an IPFS client today and add a local file to generate an ipfs hash ID, it means that I have put a file in ipfs, but this does not mean that my file has been synchronized to other nodes. The external accessibility of my local file is extremely poor. Arweave's files can be retrieved and accessed globally. You have to make this difference clear. On the contrary, your statement about the user scale of a public chain is somewhat convincing, but in terms of user scale, which public chain can surpass Bitcoin and Ethereum?

I have never boasted about the large user base of Arweave. I just said that the SCP paradigm public chain based on AR (such as AO) has the ability to acquire large-scale users because it completely breaks away from the performance constraints caused by EVM and achieves unlimited horizontal expansion. How it is achieved will be popularized in my subsequent articles. $AR