I have said before that @UltiverseDAO and @StarryNift cannot be listed on Binance. Now $ulti is clearly listed on @okx. This article will write about it:
What kind of projects will be listed on Binance, and what kind of projects will not be listed on Binance? Is there a chance that your projects and secondary projects will be listed on Binance in the future???
$BNB
#Megadrop #BTC☀ #ETHETFsApproved #UltiverseDAO #StarryNift
1. What projects does Binance like?
1) Let’s talk about a few projects, $not, #memeland. The investment and launch logic of these projects are all for users, potential large-scale users of web2.
2) $manta is about relationships. This kind of relationship-based things are not bad, but they exist.
3) Staking protocols: Binance has invested in multiple heavy staking protocols. Basically, this track can be the focus of attention. Ethfi and rez have been launched, and#stakestoneand @milky_way_zone are the hot spots in the market.
4) $edu is the leader in the education sector, and cz is personally paying attention to it. This sector is also the gateway to billions of dollars in web3, after all, education is needed to introduce web3.
5) Binance’s attention and investment in the BTC ecosystem, #bouncebit,#babylonand #zest. It can be seen that the BTC ecosystem is very large, and Binance mainly focuses on the BTC pledge and lending tracks.
6) Binance does provide more investment opportunities, but there are also many opportunities that cannot be invested.
I haven't done a very careful calculation: there are 115 projects invested by Binance that have issued tokens, and 31 projects that have not been listed on Binance. About 25% of them cannot be listed on Binance.
(I am a little depressed here: I have invested in several Binance investment projects, but why are none of them listed on Binance? All of them failed to be listed on Binance. It is toxic)
2. Take ultiverse as an example, why do I say it cannot be listed on Binance:
1) Operations: They don’t emphasize products, but only emphasize financing background. Ultiverse has been promoting Sequoia and Binance investments on many occasions. This is the only thing the project can boast of. Nothing else can be boasted of!
2) Technical development, track change again, the core slagon things progress very slowly, user hair or some operations have little to do with the core things. In fact, this is also the reason why ultiverse judged that it would not be listed on Binance, so I did not do it. The team always changes project development again and again, or does things that are not related to the core development. For the sake of data, this kind of data is likely not to be listed on Binance.
3) Project genes, track discovery and falsification or long-term significance is not great. Ultiverse is one of them. It used to do metafi things, introducing all web3 into the metaverse. Pualybux is also in this track.
4) As a result of the airdrop, the expected income is poor and the project landscape has deteriorated. There is too much information about the deposit required to be listed on Binance. The project has no money or is unwilling to pay.
5) Many of the items in the figure below fall into the above reasons:
3. Other projects that are unlikely to be listed on Binance
Ultiverse and Starrynift have mentioned before that there are many such projects. According to the above analysis, you can see which seemingly good projects cannot be listed on Binance.
I added @SecondLiveReal and @Tabichain and they can't be listed on Binance
4. Exceptional Subsequent Special Circumstances
@ionet For example, this project has top-notch market popularity in terms of operations and market, and as far as I know, it is very likely to be the unlocking method for listing on Binance.
Later, it was messed up by a community script master, unable to do witch investigation, and then he made a lot of random operations. It seems that Binance cannot go up at the moment.
5. Two projects that will definitely be listed on Binance
The recognized ones are meaningless. @MOCAFoundation and @babylon_chain will definitely be listed on Binance.
There are also some projects that are likely to be listed on Binance, which will be sorted out and sent to everyone later.
There are many Binance investments that can be listed on Binance and many that cannot be listed on Binance. I will list them separately for you later!!!
6. Compare the current gap between Binance and OKX (or analyze how bad OKX is)
I sorted out the coin listings that can be found this year. Binance has listed 16 projects this year, and OKX has listed 7. The comparison of their market capitalizations is as follows:
Binance launches 8 projects every month, with an average market value of more than 400 million, and a total market value of about 3.2 billion US dollars.
OKX has about three listings every month, but the market value can only reach about 100 million to 200 million US dollars. It can probably handle about 300 million to 600 million US dollars.
The gap with Binance is 5-10 times
7. Conclusion
It is still the oligopoly effect that is getting stronger and stronger. Binance is gradually going online through partitioning and project division (megadrop), eroding the track of medium-sized projects.
Next is OKX, and then Gate (if new users and traffic are not as expected)
Of course, no matter how bad a project is, Binance has a way to turn it into a good project. A garbage project is garbage if it is listed on the gate. But if a garbage project is listed on Binance, it may turn from bad to good.
Binance is well aware that the so-called financial gameplay, fundamentals, daily activity, revenue, and products are not as influential as the funds and users brought by direct market manipulation in a bull market. If web3 wants to take off, it needs funds and users to come in first.
$not is a typical example these days. People who criticize it say how can a rubbish click game be worth 2 billion US dollars, and how can a rubbish ton with only 6 daily active users be worth 12 billion US dollars. The criticism is not important, the most important thing is whether it can rise, and it is always unbiased!!! It is the magic weapon to win in the cryptocurrency circle.
8. A small complaint: when I searched for projects on a monthly basis, I found that many projects were promoted based on their mood, whether on Twitter or on products. Products and social media were not synchronized, and social media were not synchronized with each other. The fixed workflow was a mess.
In a sense, ok’s behavior is indeed disrespectful to the project. If an exchange does not respect the projects it lists, how can it expect the projects it lists to perform well? This also makes us understand the behavior of $okb.
At this point, I can truly understand the gap between OK and Binance.
9. A total of 6 projects are mentioned in this article. Ultiverse is a very early prediction and has been verified. Next, let’s look at the accuracy of the remaining 5 projects.
Everyone is welcome to verify it together!
