Are technology, indicators, and tactics really the core of trading?
The answer is no, this is my point of view. Of course, I do not deny the research and achievements of those technical masters. For me personally, the technical aspect only provides me with a one-sided reference value. I will adopt some of them, but not all of them. I am not saying this to DISS the technical masters. On the contrary, I still admire them very much.
But I still remember a topic discussed by my traditional financial friends before. Short-term trading is taken over by small retail investors, while cyclical trading is taken over by large retail investors and small institutions in the middle and lower reaches.
According to rumors, in the eyes of some top institutions and capital, in order to eat healthier and more convenient leeks, they will learn to cultivate leeks. By writing a lot of technology, indicators, and fancy tactics, through the Internet, person-to-person, etc., spread the faith to the general public, so that some people in the market absolutely believe in the indicator tactics they have made. This is not only the case for small retail investors, but also for large retail investors and even small institutions.
Then, when these large institutions want to eat vegetables, they will guide the leeks to turn themselves into the shapes that the institutions like to eat, and then send themselves to the table, and then the institutions will share them, which is both healthy and easy to eat. And the leeks that are cut feel that it is natural and there is nothing unreasonable. Then the leeks will continue to study tactics and techniques hard, and finally "grow up".
The above part is a joke, don't take it too seriously.
If you want to know more about the relevant knowledge of the currency circle and the first-hand cutting-edge information, click on the avatar introduction to find me. Welcome to like, collect, forward, comment, and leave a message.
