Bank establishment is considered more dangerous than standing armies because of the power and influence they hold over the economy and society. Banks have the ability to control and manipulate financial markets, interest rates, and currency values, which can have far-reaching and devastating effects on the economy.

Additionally, banks have the power to create money through the process of fractional reserve banking, which can lead to inflation and financial instability. Their actions can also lead to economic crises, such as the 2008 financial crisis, which had widespread repercussions on individuals, businesses, and governments.

Furthermore, banks often operate with little oversight and regulation, allowing them to engage in risky and unethical practices that can harm consumers and the overall financial system. Their interconnectedness and size also make them “too big to fail,” leading to bailouts and taxpayer-funded rescues in times of crisis.

In contrast, standing armies are typically under the control of governments and subject to strict regulations and oversight. While they can pose a threat to national security and engage in violent conflicts, their actions are generally more visible and predictable compared to the secretive and complex operations of banks.

In summary , the power and influence wielded by banks in the global economy make them a more dangerous force than standing armies in terms of their potential to cause widespread harm and instability.

Not financial advice do your own research.