RSIC airdropped to Bitcoin NFT users, and managed to airdrop to about 10,000 addresses, with the highest value of the airdrop ranging from 100,000 to 300,000 RMB
Most users have been following for half a year or even three years, wasting a lot of energy and paying huge opportunity costs, and finally getting a 0
I have also been swiping on Shitdake for almost a year. Its airdrop rules seem ordinary but are actually very harsh. If you miss any of the several standards set for ordinary users, you will not get the airdrop. In particular, the requirement of retaining 0.005 eth excludes a large number of users, and LP does not count. For retail investors, the advantage of swiping lies in the workload. The large amount of tx we swipe does not get due respect from it. Can Shitdake raise funds with just a little retained amount without tx? Several major rules make it easy for the project party to ambush a large number of rat warehouses. Many people on Twitter have used on-chain data 📊 to analyze the traces of the project party's ambush of rat warehouses
For a second-layer chain where a single transaction takes more than ten minutes, each transaction costs several U gas, and each transaction costs more than ten U through the official bridge, it is rare for retail investors to experience it by swiping ten U per transaction. The airdrop standard set by Shida Ke requires an interaction of more than 100 U. Even if the monthly activity is maintained at 10 U per transaction, it will take ten months to meet the standard, which also excludes a large number of retail investors. Retail investors originally use workload to gain returns, and this move by the project party also excludes most retail investors. Some people say that although 100 U does not seem to be a lot, in fact, this is a standard analyzed by the project party's backend that is conducive to excluding most people and ambushing rat warehouses. Even if retail investors have money in their pockets in the first few months, do you believe that Shida Ke will increase the interaction amount to 1000 U or even 10000 U? For a project team that calls users electronic beggars, there is no doubt that they are small-minded.
In addition to setting several necessary conditions that are inhumane to filter out a large number of real users, it has also made it easier for them to ambush and mouse trade. The team used a malicious project to crawl out a large number of interaction paths with similar behaviors to users, and judged them as witches. My account meets the criteria, and there is no reason to be judged as a witch even though I have been interacting with it for almost a year.
We are equals in the web3 community. The project side needs us to provide data and we get due rewards. We are not here to be pua or to be taken advantage of. Let's resist this extremely unfair rule and embrace a fair and open blockchain.
Embrace the Bitcoin ecosystem, embrace BRC20. Awakened people have already made a lot of money in the Bitcoin ecosystem.
In the past, we had no choice but to brush the second floor, but now the cost is too high to play (including time and opportunity cost)
Now I just want to play projects that benefit our users, not just a few evil teams, to hell with them,
