The entire BRC2.0 inscription market has cooled down recently, with many second-tier inscriptions falling by more than 50%, while first-tier inscriptions have a relatively small retracement of about 20%. Regarding inscriptions, let's briefly talk about some recent thoughts and some questions from everyone in the community, and share them here.

Some friends asked, now there are more and more inscriptions, is it necessary to participate? In addition, if you want to participate, what kind of inscriptions are worth participating in?

I think it is not about whether there are more and more inscriptions, but about the project itself and the cost performance. Inscriptions, at this stage, cannot be participated in mindlessly, and still need to be viewed from several dimensions:

1. Look at the project 2. Look at the ecosystem 3. Look at the market value

Therefore, if there is no cost-effectiveness, I will give up personally, because we participate in inscriptions not to make a small profit, not to double our money, we come to make a small bet for a big gain, we come to turn things around. A good inscription project is likely to make you famous and turn things around in one battle.

A good inscription project should be the leader in its sector (the second leader is also acceptable) and have the support of the subsequent ecosystem. It is best to intervene when its circulating market value is still small, so that the benefits can be maximized. For example, everyone should be familiar with the hottest inscriptions in the market.

Focus leader: ORDI

(The first inscription of BRC2.0)

Application leader: SATS

(Subsequently used as transaction gas fee settlement)

Community leader: BTCS (strong community)

Animal faucet: RATS (fomo high)

At this point, you may ask, these have already risen so much, is it still worthwhile to participate? Yes, there may be room for further participation, but in terms of cost-effectiveness, it is obvious that they are not a good choice.

So how to choose among the various inscriptions? Many investors always feel confused and at a loss. It doesn’t matter. I analyzed it through the above dimensions and found it. It is:

Education sector leader: xDAO

Musk's 𝕏 + web3.0's DAO = xDAO

xDAO community ecology:

Focusing on WEB3 knowledge popularization education, we are committed to serving people who are transitioning from WEB2 to WEB3 for systematic learning. Newcomers to WEB3 often miss many opportunities due to lack of knowledge, lack of places for systematic learning, and inability to obtain better resources and learning content, or fail to grasp the opportunities when they come. The xDAO ecosystem just solves the pain points of this group of people and provides all-round help to newcomers.

The xDAO community has started to cooperate with leading educational institutions. Both parties have fully leveraged their respective advantages to jointly create a more complete and efficient educational ecosystem. xDAO community members can obtain multiple rights and interests and obtain secondary income, so the future prospects of xDAO are promising.

xDAO Market Cap:

It has just started up and the market value is still very small. The unit price is the floor price, and there is huge room for subsequent growth.

BRC2.0's xDAO community is not only a platform for knowledge popularization and education, but also a platform for traffic docking resources and capital. We believe that through the efforts and contributions of community members, we can make greater contributions to the development and growth of Web3.

xDAO inscription locks community value

Community building helps web3 education

web3 education attracts public domain traffic

IP matrix targets precise groups of people

Precise groups attract capital favor

Value returns to the xDAO community