According to Odaily Planet Daily, Vitalik said in an article on X that anonymous society and financialized pseudonymous society are not really effective. A more dimensional concept of identity seems necessary, otherwise the most stable governance structure will be a centralized structure, and others will be attacked by financialized governance. Even today, these issues are at work in DAO. Anomymity is a check and balance that cannot run the entire cycle. Pluralistic thinking can help find effective risk mitigation measures for X.
Some users expressed the need for the concept of dual or multiple identities, and Vitalik agreed and pointed out that granular selection of how much to disclose is a design principle for many zk applications. In addition, he also said that whether governance behavior is abused cannot be inferred simply by observing the behavior itself, and culture behaves similarly to governance in these aspects.
