However, Balaji notes that these smart things lack coordination and memory. That is, they can't synchronize with each other or with their owners online and store memories of those conversations.
Balaji says that even if they could, there's a serious problem: "Who owns the private key? "
Buterin, in his typical fashion, proposed a solution that he believes could solve this problem. He stated that explicit control over private keys and technology should belong to people personally.
This implies that, as in the case of wallets, the owner should have full control without relying on intermediaries who created such technology. LINE
Vitalik Buterin emphasized an important point regarding the security of such technologies. He noted that self-protection "is not a standard outcome in the current crypto ecosystem. "LINE BREAK Users still place funds in centralized organizations such as exchanges. LINE BREAK This may seem convenient, but it exposes owners to inconvenient risks such as mismanagement and hacking. Exposing owners to mismanagement, hacking, and other inconvenient risks. Fraudsters have already begun exploring the use of #Elon Musk's artificial bots.
Therefore, Buterin advocates a more decentralized approach to the artificial Internet of Things, where the owner of the #private key has full control over the technology. He states. This will minimize attacks by malicious actors seeking to take control and "infiltrate" such smart homes.
Buterin concludes with an important point.
Read us at: Compass Investments
