The Bavarian State Office for Data Protection (BayLDA) has ordered World (formerly Worldcoin) to delete biometric data collected from users, citing violations of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The decision has sparked a legal battle, with World filing an appeal against the ruling.
BayLDA claims World’s data collection practices, including iris scans, lacked a sufficient legal basis and violated GDPR. The regulator has demanded the company establish a deletion procedure compliant with privacy laws and ensure explicit user consent for future data collection. World has argued that the ruling is based on outdated systems and technologies no longer in use, stating that its current operations comply with GDPR requirements.
The investigation began in early 2023 and only recently concluded, with BayLDA publishing its findings. World maintains that its updated practices address regulatory concerns and continues to challenge the order. The company’s response highlights the tension between evolving technologies and strict European privacy laws.
This dispute could significantly impact World’s ability to operate in the European Union, a region known for its stringent data protection standards. Critics argue that this legal challenge strikes at the core of the company's identity verification model, potentially hampering its development in the region.
World, a digital identity platform, collects biometric data like iris scans to create a global identity system. While the company rebranded in October, it has faced ongoing scrutiny from regulators and struggled with market volatility. Its native token, WLD, saw a brief surge after the U.S. elections but quickly lost momentum. The token's uncertain future mirrors the company’s current challenges in navigating regulatory landscapes.
Germany has taken a tougher stance on cryptocurrency and digital assets in recent months. In July, the government sold its entire Bitcoin holdings and initiated a crackdown on crypto exchanges. This increased regulatory pressure could further complicate World’s position in the market.
Despite the legal setbacks, World has shown no signs of backing down. The appeal process is expected to delay the enforcement of BayLDA’s order, allowing the company to continue its operations for now. However, the long-term outcome of this dispute remains unclear. Whether World’s efforts to address privacy concerns will satisfy regulators is a question that only time will answer.
The case underlines the growing scrutiny of biometric data collection and highlights the challenges faced by tech companies in balancing innovation with compliance. The outcome of this legal battle could have far-reaching implications for digital identity platforms and the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem.
