SlowMist’s founder critiques AI agents in crypto, citing short-term token incentives rather than real innovation.
X user Yuuu defends AI progress in crypto, citing frameworks like Eliza and G.A.M.E. as examples of meaningful development.
Commenter Lijiang criticizes buzzword-driven projects, likening them to scams.
A Twitter exchange between industry figures has sparked a debate about the role of AI agents in the crypto industry. The discussion revolves around whether current projects offer real innovation or simply focus on token-based incentives.
AI Agents Not Adding Real Value to Crypto
Cos, the founder of blockchain security firm SlowMist, ignited the conversation by expressing concerns about the use of AI agents in the crypto industry. He argued that they are primarily employed to create tokens to generate short-term incentives rather than advance technological progress.
Cos pointed out that large companies outside of crypto have already built advanced AI applications and interoperability protocols. Yet, the crypto world seems stuck on issuing tokens.
However, Cos clarified that he isn’t dismissing all AI projects in crypto. He encouraged the co…
The post AI Agents Are Shaping Crypto, But Do They Deliver Real Value? appeared first on Coin Edition.
