Just now, someone asked if guessing that $30 opening is a bit too optimistic. Here are my views:
1. VANA doesn't have many studios to mass farm (at least the studios around me don't), so the pressure from airdrop dumping is slightly smaller.
2. VANA hasn't signed many KOL investments, so the selling pressure from KOLs will also be less than those that have signed.
3. The previous project $USUAL was hit hard after the $SCR damage, but the secondary market actually rebounded. Many who sold off this time might not be willing to buy at market price to dump.
4. If $VANA is $20, the annualized mining yield of BNB is 115%. If it reaches $35, it could get to $200%. The returns in a bull market pool reaching about 150% shouldn't be too much, which is close to $30.
5. If the team is smart, they should control a lot of airdrop chips, taking advantage of the opponent's low position and the current market sentiment to do something, of course, this depends on the team's vision. To be honest, the performance of the secondary market now far exceeds the impact of the team secretly farming airdrops.
In fact, after the Binance announcement, I saw many people criticizing it, thinking that withvana is not high quality. Some arguments cited are clearly from those who haven't looked into it carefully, as criticizing Binance (especially new coins) has become part of political correctness now.
The best way to counter these criticisms is not to argue point by point, but with a strong bullish line. Only then will the scholars start to seriously see what Vana is really doing and whether it is truly an AI project.
