Why isn’t the community prioritizing the revaluation of USTC to $1?
A key part of the long-term success of the Luna Classic project ($LUNC ) relies on the revaluation of USTC to $1. But here’s the question: Why isn’t the community focusing more on achieving this goal? When we look at the numbers, the total supply of USTC is much smaller than that of LUNC; wouldn’t it make more sense for the community to concentrate some of its investment and efforts here?
Let’s break this down further. Unlike LUNC, which has an immense circulating supply and requires large burns or demand to achieve significant price movements, USTC already has a more manageable supply structure. For example, with a circulating supply of just over 9 billion tokens, pushing USTC closer to $1 would require much less capital than what would be needed to drastically increase the value of LUNC.
If the community reallocates some of its resources, investments, and focus toward USTC, we could potentially trigger a strong upward movement in the price. A successful revaluation would not only enhance the value of USTC but could also restore faith in the Luna Classic ecosystem as a whole, creating a domino effect that indirectly benefits LUNC. After all, the utility and credibility of the entire project are closely linked to the stability of USTC.
Of course, this approach would require coordinated community efforts, including sustainable burn mechanisms, incentives to hold USTC, and demand-driven use cases to stabilize the price over time. It’s no small task, but it is far from impossible with community action and appropriate strategies.
So, is it time to refocus on USTC? Given the amount of numbers and the potential for quicker success, it’s a question worth seriously considering. The opportunity to gain momentum is there; it just needs a collective push.
No question is stupid when it challenges us to think more deeply and plan more intelligently.
