Leeks, you need to understand one thing. Strategies can be divided into two categories: big bets on small outcomes and small bets on big outcomes. The former has a high win rate and seems to always make money, but this comes at the cost of holding positions and shorting volatility, with the consequence of losing it all. The latter has a low win rate, usually not exceeding 50%, but a single win can recover losses, and if luck is on your side, winning twice can yield returns of more than ten times. Holding positions means exposing yourself to the market, where the initiative lies with the market. Whether you're on the rooftop or in the club, it all depends on whether the market decides to strike. Any strategy that involves holding positions, claiming to have made a certain multiple, I look down on. Because mathematical principles dictate that in the end, you lose it all. Those who say you can buy and make money should look at the chart below and the signal alerts next to it, and consider whether a signal always leads to a price increase. There is only one kind of grassroots wave rider, but it’s clear that those who play with algorithms have a better situation than most gamblers. However, many people prefer to hear stories for psychological comfort; even if they go bust, it doesn't matter. As long as they keep making excuses, like the market is too bad, or the turtle has inserted needles, or there are false messages, they can continuously rationalize their behavior and selectively forget painful memories. Analysts who tell stories will always exist because people are naturally inclined to listen to stories.